Bridge Simulation System with Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction

지반 구조 상호작용을 고려한 교량 시뮬레이션 시스템

  • 김익환 (서울산업대학교 건설공학부) ;
  • 한봉구 (서울산업대학교 건설공학부)
  • Received : 2007.10.17
  • Accepted : 2008.03.31
  • Published : 2008.07.30

Abstract

The hybrid simulation test method is a versatile technique for evaluating the seismic performance of structures by seamlessly integrating both physical and numerical simulations of substructures into a single test mode. In this paper, a software framework that integrates computational and experimental simulation has been developed to simulate and test a bridge structural system under earthquake loading. Using hybrid simulation, the seismic response of complex bridge structural systems partitioned into multiple large-scale experimental and computational substructures at networked distributed experimental and computational facilities can be evaluated. In this paper, the examples of application are presented in terms of a bridge model with soil-foundation-structure interaction.

하이브리드 시뮬레이션 실험방법은 단일실험모드하의 물리적 또는 수치해석적 시뮬레이션에 의하여 지진발생시 구조물을 평가하는 다양한 기술 중에 하나이다. 본 논문에서는 지진하중하의 교량구조 시스템의 해석과 실험을 위해서 계산과 실험 시뮬레이션을 통합한 소프트웨어체제를 개발하였다. 개발한 하이브리드시뮬레이션 소프트웨어체제를 이용하여 대규모 네트워크로 분산된 실험 또는 전산장비에 참여하고 있는 교량구조시스템에 대한 지진응답을 평가할 수 있었다. 본 논문에서는 적용 예를 통하여 지반 구조 상호작용을 고려한 교량의 시뮬레이션 해석방법을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Broderick, B. M. and Elnashai, A. S., "Analysis of the failure of Interstate 10 freeway ramp during", the Northridge earthquake of 17 January 1994 Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 24, 1995, pp. 189-208 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290240205
  2. Chen C., Ricles JM., "Effective force testing method using virtual mass for real-time earthquake simulation", Proc. of the 8th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, 2006
  3. Elnashai A., Spencer B. F., Kuchma D., Hashash Y., Ghaboussi J. and Gan G., "Multi-axial full-scale sub-structured testing and simulation (MUST-SIM) facility at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2004
  4. Horiuchi T., Inoue M., Konno T., Namita Y., "Real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 28(10), 1999, pp.1121-1141 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1121::AID-EQE858>3.0.CO;2-O
  5. Mahin, S. A. and Shing, P. B., "Pseudodynamic Method for Seismic Testing", Journal of Structural Engineering ; 111(7):, 1985, pp. 1482-1503 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:7(1482)
  6. Mahin, S. A., Shing, P. B., Thewalt, C. R., and Hanson, R. D., "Pseudodynamic test method-Current status and future direction", Journal of Structural Engineering; 115(8), 1989, pp. 2113-2128 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(2113)
  7. Magonette, G., "Development and application of large-scale continuous pseudodynamic testing techniques", Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 359, 2001, pp. 1771-1799 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0873
  8. Magonette, G. and Negro, P., "Verification of the pseudodynamic test method", Eur. Earthquake Eng., XII(I), 1998, pp. 40-50
  9. Nakashima M., Kato H., Takaoka E., "Development of real-time pseudo-dynamic testing". Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 21(1), 1992, pp. 79-92 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210106
  10. Nakashima, M., Kaminosono, T., Ishida, M. and Ando, K., "Integration techniques for substructure pseudo dynamic test", 4th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, CA, Palm Springs, 1990, pp. 515-524
  11. Pan, P., Tada, M. and Nakashima, M. "Online hybrid test by internet linkage of distributed test-analysis domains." Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(11), 2005, pp. 1407-1425 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.494
  12. Pearlman, L., D'Arcy, M., Johnson, E., Kesselman, C., and Plaszczak, P., "NEESgrid teleoperation control protocol", Technical Rep No. NEESgrid-2003-07, NEESgrid, 2003
  13. Shing, P.B. and Mahin, S.A., "Computational Aspects of a Seismic Performance Test Method using On-line Computer Control", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 13, 1985, pp. 507-526 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290130406
  14. Spencer, B., Elnashai, A., Kuchma, D. and Abrams, D., "The MOST experiment: Earthquake engineering on the grid", Technical Rep. No. NEESgrid-2004-26, NEESgrid, 2004
  15. Stojadinovic, B., Mosqueda, G., and Mahin, S. A., "Event-driven control system for geographically distributed hybrid simulation", J. Struct. Eng., 132(1), 2006, pp. 68-77 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:1(68)
  16. Takanashi, K., Udagawa, K., Seki, M., Okada, T. and Tanaka, H., "Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computeractuator on-line system (details of the system)", Trans. of the Architectural Institute of Japan, 229, 1975, pp. 77-83 https://doi.org/10.3130/aijsaxx.229.0_77
  17. Takanashi, K. and Nakashima, M., "Japanese activities on on-line testing", J. Eng. Mech., 113(7), 1987, pp. 1014-1032 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:7(1014)
  18. Takahashi, Y. and Fences, G. L., "Software framework for distributed experimental- computational simulation of structural systems", Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(3), 2006, pp. 267-291 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.518
  19. Wang, K. J., Lin, B. Z., Cheng, W. C., Wang, S. J., Yang, Y. S. and Tsai, K. C., "A platform for networked collaborative structural experiments", Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Advanced in Experimental Structural Engineering, Nagoya, Japan, 2005
  20. Watanabe, E., Kitada, T., Kunitomo, S. and Nagata, K., "Parallel pseudodynamic seismic loading test on elevated bridge system through the Internet", Proc., 8thEast Asia- Pacific Conf. on Structural Engineering and Construction, Singapore, 2001