Can Information Technology Revive Rural Economies?: The Cases of E-villages in Korea and Japan

정보통신기술과 농촌 경제: 한국과 일본 정보화마을의 사례 연구

  • Huh, Woo-Kung (Department of Geography, Seoul National University)
  • 허우긍 (서울대학교 사회과학대학 지리학과)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

There has been a high expectation that information technology (IT) can do something good for the rural perils. Efforts thus have been made in many countries to 'informatize' rural areas, namely to roll out IT infrastructure into remote areas and to enhance the computer literacy of rural residents. The present study examines the 'e-village' projects implemented in Korea and Japan. It evaluates the business models employed by the e-villages such as e-shops of local products and tour guide programs, the ways in which rural residents have managed their business models, the practices of information exchange within and outside of the villages, and the monetary gains of the business models. The study collects data mainly from the e-village web pages of both countries. The study reveals that the e-village business models have performed less than expected in general, and that Japanese e-villages are better off than the Korean counterparts. The study identifies the factors responsible for such mediocre performances of the business models including a lack of retail business experiences and capabilities of the rural people. The study findings highlight the importance of human resources, rather than the new technology per se, for rural development.

농촌의 부흥을 위하여 정보통신기술에 거는 기대가 크고, 정보화 사업이 도처에서 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 정보통신기술의 보급만으로는 농촌의 경제가 활성화되기 어렵다는 시각도 있다. 이 논문은 농촌의 정보화사업에 대한 이런 쟁점을 가리는데 목적을 두었다. 한국의 정보화 마을과 일본의 무라(촌(村))를 대상으로, 해당 마을의 홈페이지에서는 어떤 수익모델들을 채택하고 있으며 정보통신기술은 어떻게 활용하고 있는지, 고객들은 얼마나 자주 이용하고 있는지, 또 수익은 얼마나 창출되었는지를 비교 분석하였다. 분석결과, 수익모델의 활용과 성과가 전반적으로 기대에 못 미쳤으며, 한국보다는 일본 사례에서 그 성과가 다소 나은 것으로 밝혀졌다. 수익모델의 활용과 성과가 이처럼 미흡한 것은 운영자들의 경험 부족과 농촌 인력의 한계 등과 관련이 있는 것으로 보인다. 이 연구결과는 농어촌의 정보화에 정보통신기술의 보급 못지 않게 인적 자원도 중요함을 부각시켰다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott, E., Yarbrough, P., and Schmidt, A., 2000, Farmers, computers, and the Internet: How structures and roles shape the information society, in Korsching, P., Hipple, P., and Abbott, E. (eds), Having All the Right Connections: Telecommunications and Rural Viability, Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, 201-226
  2. Ataka, Y., 2006, Effects of investment for informatization on regional economic growth: Investigation with growth accounts, Annals of the Japan Association of Economic Geographers, 52(2), 67-81 (in Japanese with an English abstract)
  3. Beyers, W., 2000, Cyberspace or human space: wither cities in the age of telecommunications?, in Wheeler, J. and Aoyama, Y. (eds.), Cities in the Telecommunications Age: The Fracturing of Geographies, Routeledge, New York, 161-180
  4. Choo, S., 2001, Rural telematics and the possibilities for regional development: the case of Information Model Village in Weonju, Korea, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 36(5), 516-526
  5. Cronin, F., McGovern, P., Miller, M., and Parker, E., 1995, The rural economic development implications of telecommunications: Evidence from Pennsylvania, Telecommunications Policy, 19(7), 545-559 https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(95)00031-Z
  6. Grewal, D., Iyer, G., and Levy, M., 2004, Internet retailing: enablers, limiters and market consequences, Journal of Business Research, 57, 703-713 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00348-X
  7. Grimes, S., 2003, The digital economy challenge facing peripheral rural areas, Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 174-193
  8. Gunasekaran, V. and Harmantzis, F., 2007, Emerging wireless technologies for developing countries, Technology in Society, 29, 23-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.001
  9. Hashimoto, K., 2005, The marketing strategy of a small mountain village using the Internet: the example of Umaji-mura, Paper presented at the annual conference of the IGU Commission on the Geography of the Information Society, held at Benevento, Italy, June 5-9, 2005
  10. Hiratsuka, C., 2005, Two types of regional informatization: Yatsuo-cho and Yamada-mura In Toyama Prefecture, The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research, April 2005, 52-64 (in Japanese)
  11. Huh, W., 1999, The Rural Computer Schools and informatization of rural areas in Korea, NETCOM, Networks and Communication Studies, 13.1, 123-142
  12. Huh, W., 2001, Computers and the Internet in rural areas: the case of Hwangdun E-village, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 36(5), 501- 515
  13. Huh, W., 2004, The Internet and computers and rural changes: the experiences of Hwangdun Evillage, Korea, in Gustafsson, G. (ed.), Communication and Regional Development, 161-173, Karlstad University Studies 2002:45, Karlstad, Sweden
  14. Kamiya, H., Kim, D., Yamada, H., and Huh, W., 2001, A survey on the computer use of Yamada-mura, Toyama Prefecture, Geography Report, Aichi College of Education, 92, 44-49 (in Japanese)
  15. Kamiya, H., Kim, D., Yamada, H., and Huh, W., 2004, The development of information technology and the process of rural informatization in Japan: a case study in Yamada Municipality in Japan, in Gustafsson, G. (ed.), Communication and Regional Development, 175-181, Karlstad University Studies 2002:45, Karlstad
  16. Korsching, P., Hipple, P., and Abbott, E., 2000, Rural America and the information and communications revolution, in Korsching, P., Hipple, P. and Abbott, E. (eds.), Having All The Right Connections: Telecommunications and Rural Viability, Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, 3-21
  17. Kurada, I., 1997, Marching Yamada-mura with the Internet. Kumasasa-sha, Tokyo (in Japanese)
  18. Lentz, R. and Oden, M., 2001, Digital divide or digital opportunity in the Mississippi Delta region of the U.S., Telecommunications Policy, 25(5), 291- 313 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(01)00006-4
  19. Malecki, E., 2003, Digital development in rural areas:potentials and pitfalls, Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 201-214 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00068-2
  20. Mills, B. and Whitacre, B., 2003, Understanding the nonmetropolitan-metropolitan digital divide, Growth and Change, 34(2), 219-243 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2257.00215
  21. Nagaki, M., 2003, Economic effects of agro-rural informatization, Agriculture and Horticulture, 78(1) 110-117(in Japanese)
  22. Nihei, T., 2000, Regional development of agricultural information network: Focusing on computer networks in Ibaraki Prefecture, Annals of the Japan Association of Economic Geographers, 46(4), 396-418 (in Japanese with an English abstract)
  23. Oda, S., 2000, Informatization of rural areas and investment and financing: focusing on the rural information services in shi's, cho's and mura's, in Inamoto, J. and Watai, H. (eds.), Investing and Financing for the Improvement of Agricultural Management, Huminkyokai, Osaka, 230-248 (in Japanese)
  24. Parker, E., 2000, Closing the digital divide in rural America, Telecommunications Policy, 24, 281-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00018-5
  25. Ramirez, R., 2001, A model for rural and remote information and communication technologies: a Canadian exploration, Telecommunications Policy, 25(5), 315-330 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(01)00007-6
  26. Research Group on the Utilization of Agricultural Information, Japan, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006,, Yearbook of Agricultural Informatization (in Japanese)
  27. Strover, S., 2001. Rural internet connectivity, Telecommunications Policy, 25(5), 331-347 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(01)00008-8
  28. Takahashi, S., 2003, National policies of agricultural informatization, Agriculture and Horticulture, 78(1), 104-109(in Japanese)
  29. Walsh, J. and Godfrey, S., 2000, The Internet: a new era in customer service, European Management Journal, 18(1), 85-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00071-7
  30. Wilson-Jeanselme, M. and Reynolds, J., 2005, Growth without profit: the Internet transaction profitability paradox, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12, 165-177 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.06.001
  31. Zott, C., Amit, R., and Donlevy, J., 2000, Strategies for value creation in e-commerce: best practice in Europe, European Management Journal, 18(5), 463-475 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00036-0