Multi-criteria Decision Making Method for Developing Greenhouse Gas Technologies Strategically Considering Scale Efficiency: AHP/DEA CCR-I and BCC-I Integrated model Approach

규모의 경제성을 고려한 전략적 온실가스저감기술 개발을 위한 다기준의사결정기법: AHP/DEA CCR-I 및 BCC-I 혼합모형 적용

  • Lee, Seong-Kon (Energy Policy Research Division, Korea Institute of Energy Research) ;
  • Mogi, Gento (Department of Technology Management for Innovation(TMI), Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Wook (Energy Policy Research Division, Korea Institute of Energy Research)
  • 이성곤 (한국에너지기술연구원 정책연구실) ;
  • 겐토모기 (The Univ. of Tokyo 기술경영학과) ;
  • 김종욱 (한국에너지기술연구원 정책연구실)
  • Published : 2008.12.30

Abstract

In 1997, Korean government established the National Energy and Resources Plan, which targeted from 1997 to 2005 with strategic energy technology development. At the end of 2005, Korean government built a New National Energy and Resources Plan preparing for upcoming 10 years from 2006 until 2015 based on energy technology trees comparing with the previous plan, which based on the energy R&D projects. In this research, we prioritize the relative preferences and efficiency by an AHP/DEA CCR-I and BCC-I integrated model approach considering scale efficiency for well focused R&D and efficiency of developing Greenhouse Gas technologies as an extended research from a view point of econometrics as an extended research.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, 1978, pp. 429-444 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  2. B. Casu, E. Thanassoulis, "Evaluating cost efficiency in central administrative services in UK universities", Omega. Vol. 34, 2006, pp. 417-426 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.020
  3. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2008, British Petroleum, England, 2008
  4. C. Schaffnit, D. Rosen, J.C. Paradi, "Best Practice Analysis of Bank Branches: An Application of DEA in a Large Canadian Bank," European Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 98, 1997, pp. 269-289 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00347-5
  5. G. Vitner, S. Rozenes, S. Spraggett, "Using data envelope analysis to compare project efficiency in a multi-project environment", International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24, 2006, pp. 323-329 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.09.004
  6. H. H. Chang, "Determinants of Hospital Efficiency: the Case of Central Government-owned Hospitals in Taiwan", Omega, Vol. 26, 1998, pp. 307-317 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00014-0
  7. Key World Energy Statistics 2007, IEA, France, 2007
  8. S.K. Lee, J.W. Kim, "World energy outlook and measures". KIER-A52417, 2005, pp. 299-354
  9. S.K. Lee, J.W. Kim, Y.J. Yoon, "A study on World Energy outlook and the optimal alternatives for Developing Energy Technology: Focusing on coal utilization technology", J. of Energy Engineering, 15(3), 2006, pp. 174-180
  10. S.K. Lee, Y.J. Yoon, J.W. Kim, "Long-term improvements in national energy efficiency and GHG control plans using the AHP approach", Energy Policy, Vol. 35(5), 2007, pp. 2862-2868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.09.019
  11. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "Assessment model for selecting the strategic R&D programs of energy technology development: analytic network process", Proc. of Korea Institute of Chemical engineers Fall Conf., 2007, p. 233
  12. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "A study on the framework for selecting core R&D programs in Energy Technology Roadmap by the DEA approach", Proc. of World Energy Congress 2007, 2007, pp. 1-25
  13. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "A fuzzy AHP approach to prioritize the energy technology development strategy and policy", New and Renewable Energy, Vol. 4(1), 2008, pp. 19-24
  14. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "The competitiveness of Korea as a developer of energy technology: the AHP approach", Energy Policy, Vol. 36(4), 2008, pp. 1284-1291 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.12.003
  15. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, S.C. Shin, J.W. Kim, "Measuring the relative efficiency of greenhouse gas technologies: an AHP/DEA hybrid model approach, Proc. of Int'l Conf. on Industrial Engineering 2008, 2008, pp. 1615-1619
  16. T.L. Saaty, "Exploring optimization through hierarchies and ratio scales", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 355-363 https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(86)90047-9
  17. T.L. Saaty, "How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process", European Journal of Operations research, Vol. 48, 1992, pp. 9-26
  18. T.L. Saaty, "The Analytic Hierarchy Process", first ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980
  19. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, S.C. Shin, "Strategy of energy technology development for establishing the hydrogen economy", Trans. of the Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, pp. 207-215
  20. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "Prioritizing the weights of hydrogen energy technologies in the sector of thehydrogen economy by using a fuzzy AHP approach", Proc. of the 3rd Korea-USA Joint Symposium on Hydrogen & Fuel Cell Technologies, 2008, pp. 263-272
  21. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for assessing national competitiveness in the hydrogen technology sector", International. Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 33, No. 23, 2008, pp. 6840-6848 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.028
  22. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "A fuzzy AHP/DEA hybrid model for allocating energy R&D resources efficiently: In case of energy technologies against high oil prices", Proc. of 7th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies 2008, 2008, pp. 2042-2049
  23. S.K. Lee, G. Mogi, J.W. Kim, "Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Measuring Relative Efficiency of Greenhouse Gas Technologies: AHP/DEA Hybrid Model Approach", Engineering Letters, Vol. 16(4), 2008, pp. 1-5