DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biological Characteristics of Two Natural Enemies of Thrips, Orius strigicollis (Poppius) and O. laevigatus (Fieber) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae)

총채벌레 천적 으뜸애꽃노린재(Orius strigicollis)와 미끌애꽃노린재(Orius laevigatus)의 생물학적 특성 비교

  • Kim, Jeong-Hwan (Applied Entomology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hwang-Yong (Applied Entomology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Byoun, Young-Woong (Applied Entomology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Heon (Applied Entomology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA)
  • 김정환 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과) ;
  • 김황용 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과) ;
  • 변영웅 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과) ;
  • 김용헌 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 곤충산업과)
  • Published : 2008.12.30

Abstract

With the comparison of native Orius strigicollis (Poppius) to European O. laevigatus (Fieber), we investigated biological characteristics such as developmental period, fecundity, life span, predation ability, and augmentation after release. Experiments were carried out at five temperature condition, $15^{\circ}C\;20^{\circ}C,\;25^{\circ}C\;30^{\circ}C$, and $35^{\circ}C$. In the case of O. strigicollis, egg period was $3.1{\sim}14.9$ days (hatchability: $46.7{\sim}88.2%$), and developmental period of nymphs was $9.4{\sim}42.8$ days (survival rate: $2.4{\sim}96.5%$). Fecundity at each temperature was 28.1, 107.9, 123.6, 127.3, and 18.1, respectively. Life span of adults was 63.4, 40.1, 22.1, 18.3, and 11.0 days, respectively. In the case of O. laevigatus, egg period was $3.1{\sim}13.5$ days (hatchability: $65.0{\sim}89.9%$), and developmental period of nymphs was $9.3{\sim}42.0$ (survival rate: $4.3{\sim}80.6%$) days. Fecundity at each temperature was 101.8, 218.6, 224.5, 219.5, and 15.7. Life span of adults was 70.6, 66.4, 32.6, 34.5, and 7.3 days, respectively. In long-day condition (16L:8D), fecundity of O. strigicollis and O. laevigatus was 105.8 $(18^{\circ}C){\sim}142.4(25^{\circ}C)$ and 109.5 $(18^{\circ}C){\sim}191.5(25^{\circ}C)$, respectively. In short-day condition (10L:14D), fecundity of them was 1.0 $(18^{\circ}C){\sim}31.8(25^{\circ}C)$ and 63.0 $(18^{\circ}C){\sim}198.8(25^{\circ}C)$, respectively. Daily prey consumption of second instar Frankliniella occidentalis was 14.3 and 10.9, respectively. In greenhouse, density of O. strigicollis begins to increase from mid May and peaked about early July (1.8 individual/flower), while that of O. laevigatus begins to increase from mid March and peaked about early June (6.6 individual/flower).

국내종인 으뜸애꽃노린재와 유럽종인 미끌애꽃노린재의 알, 약충 발육기간과 성충의 산란수, 수명, 포식량 및 포장밀도에서 증가량을 비교하였다. 으뜸애꽃노린재와 미끌애꽃노린재의 $15{\sim}30^{\circ}C$에서 알 부화율은 각각 $46.7{\sim}88.2%$$65.0{\sim}89.9%$였고, 알기간은 각각 $3.1{\sim}14.9$일과 $3.1{\sim}13.5$일이었다. 두 종의 약충 발육기간은 각각 $9.4{\sim}42.8$일과 $9.3{\sim}42.0$일이었고, 약충기간 생존율은 각각 $2.4{\sim}96.5%$$4.3{\sim}80.6%$였다. 두 종의 산란수는 15, 20, 25, 30, $35^{\circ}C$에서 각각 28.1, 107.9, 123.6, 127.3, 18.1개와 101.8, 218.6, 224.5, 219.5, 15.7개였고, 성충수명은 각각 63.4, 40.1, 22.1, 18.3, 11.0일과 70.6, 66.4, 32.6, 34.5, 7.3일로 으뜸애꽃노린재에 비해 미끌애꽃노린재의 산란수가 많고 성충수명은 길었다. 으뜸애꽃노린재와 미끌애꽃노린재의 온도와 일장에 의한 산란수는 $18^{\circ}C$, 16L:8D에서 각각 105.8개와 109.5개였고, 10L:14D에서 각각 1.0개와 63.0개였다. $25^{\circ}C$, 16L:8D에서 각각 142.4개와 191.5개였고, 10L:14D에서 각각 31.8개와 198.8개로 으뜸애꽃노린재는 $18^{\circ}C$, 10L:14D에서에 거의 모든 개체가 휴면하지만 미끌에꽃노린재는 휴면하지 않는다, 으뜸애꽃노린재와 미끌애꽃노린재의 꽃노랑총채벌레 2령 하루 포식량은 각각 14.3마리와 10.9마리이다. 겨울작형 시설재배 파프리카에서 으뜸애꽃노린재는 5월 중순부터 증가하기 시작하여 7월 상순에는 꽃당 1.8마리로 증가하였다. 미끌애꽃노린재는 3월 중순부터 증가하여 6월 상순에는 꽃당 6.6마리로 증가하는 과밀도 현상을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alauzet, C., D. Darganon and C. Malausa. 1994. Bionomics of a polyphagous predator: Orius laevigatus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Entomophaga 39(1): 33-40 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373492
  2. Anonymous. 1994. Check list of insect from Korea (The Entomological society of Korea and Korea society of applied entomology). Kon-kuk university press, Seoul, Korea. pp.744
  3. Brodsgaard, H. F., and L. S. Hansen. 1992. Effect of Amblyseius cucumeris and Amblyseius barkeri as biological control agents of Thrips tabaci on glasshouse Cucumbers. Biocontrol science and technology 2: 215-223 https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159209355235
  4. Chambers, R. J. and N. L. Helyer. 1993. Effectiveness of Orius laevigatus (Hem.: Anthocoridae) for the control of Frankliniella occidentalis on cucumber and pepper in the UK. Biocontrol Science and Technology 3: 295-307 https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159309355284
  5. Cho, J.R., J H. Kim, M.H. Lee and H.S. Kim. 2005. Induction and termination of the reproductive diapause in the minute pirate bug Orius strigicollis Poppius (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). J. Asia-Pacific Entomol. 8(2): 167-174 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1226-8615(08)60088-6
  6. Frescata, C. and A. Mexia. 1996. Biological control of thrips (Thysanoptera) by Orius laevigatus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in organically_grown strawberries. Biological agriculture and horticulture 13: 141-148 https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.1996.9754773
  7. Herring, J.L. 1966. The genus Orius of western hemisphere (Heteroptera; Anthocoridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 59(6): 1093-1109 https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/59.6.1093
  8. Kelton, L. A. 1963. Synopsis of the genus Wolff in America north of Maxico (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Can. Entomol. 95: 631-636 https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent95631-6
  9. Kelton, L. A. 1978. The Anthocoridae of Canada and Alaska (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part4. pp.97
  10. Kim J. H., M. W. Han, G. H. Lee, Y. H. Kim, J. O. Lee and C. J. In. 1997. Development and oviposition of Orius strigicollis (Poppius) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) reared on three different insect preys. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 36(2); 166-171
  11. Kim, J.H., G.S. Lee, Y.H. Kim, K.J. Yoo. 2001. Species composition of Orius spp. (Hemiptera : Anthocoridae) and their seasonal occurrence on several plants in Korea. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 40(3): 211-217
  12. Kim, J.H., Y.H. Kim, H.W. Han and K.S. Lee. 1998. Researches on the mass production and utilization of Orius sp.. Ann. Res. of NIAST (Dept. Crop Protection): pp. 461-479
  13. Kim, J.H., Y.H. Kim, H.W. Han, K.S. Lee and J.O. Lee. 1999. Effect of temperature on development and oviposition of minute pirate bug, Orius strigicollis Poppius (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 38(1): 29-33
  14. Kim, J.H., Y.W. Byoun, H.Y. Kim and Y.H. Kim. 2006. Application of natural enemies for the biological control of arthropod pests on sweet pepper. Ann. Res. of NIAST (Agricultural biology research): pp. 769-787
  15. Lattin, J. D. and N.L. Stanton. 1992. A review of the Anthocoridae (Heteroptera; Heteroptera) found on Pinus contorta. J. New York Entomol. Soc. 100(3): 424-479.
  16. Lee, G.S. K.B. Um, K.J. Cho, J.E. Song, S.H. Kang. 1996. Seasonal occurrence of Thrips palmi (Thysanopyera: Thripidae). Ann. Res. of NIAST (Dept. Crop Protection): pp. 694-717
  17. Malais M. and W. J. Ravensberg. 1992. The biology of glasshouse pests and their natural enemies. Koppert Biological Systems: pp. 288
  18. Moon, H.C., I.K. Cho. J.R. Im, B.R. Goh, D.H. Kim and C.Y. Hwang. 2006. Seasonal occurrence and damage by thrips on open red pepper in Jeonbuk Province. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 45(1): 9-13
  19. Ohno K. and H. Takemoto. 1997. Species composition of Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), predacious natural enemies of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptwra: Thripidae), in eggplant fields and surrounding habitats. Appl. Entomolo. Zool. 10: 89-91
  20. Ohta, I. 2001. Effect of temperature on development of Orius strigicollis (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) fed on Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Appl. Entomol. zool. 36(4): 483-488 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2001.483
  21. Paik, C.H., C.Y. Hwang, G.H. Lee, D.H. Kim, M.Y. Choi, S.Y. Na and S.S. Kim. 2003. Development, reproduction and logivity of predator Orius sauteri Poppius (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) when reared on three different preys. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 42(1); 35-41
  22. Park, J.D, D.I. Kim and S.G. Kim. 2002. Seasonal occurrence damaged of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) by cultural environments and varieties of chrysanthemum. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 41(3): 177-181
  23. Salas-Aguilar, J. and L. E. Ehler. 1977. Feeding habits of Orius tristicolor. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 70: 60-62 https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/70.1.60
  24. Sanchez, J,A. and A. Lacasa. 2002. Modelling population dynamics of Orius laevigatus and O. albidipennis (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) to optimize their use as biological control agents of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Bulletin of Entomol. Res. 92: 77-88
  25. Tommasini, M.G. 2004. Collection of Orius species in Italy. Bulletin of insectology 57(2); 65-72
  26. Tommasini, M.G. and J.C. van Lanteren. 2003. Occurrence of diapause in Orius laevigatus. Bulletin of insectology 56(2); 225-251
  27. Tommasini, M.G., J.C. van Lanteren and G. Burgio 2004. Biological traits and predation capacity of four Orius species on two prey species. Bulletin of insectology 57(2); 79-93
  28. Van de veire, M. and D. Degheele. 1995. Comparative laboratory experiment with Orius insidiosus and Orius albidipennis (Het.: Anthocoridae). two candidates for biological control in glasshouses. Entomophaga 40(3/4): 341-344 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373721
  29. Yasunaga, T. 1993. A taxonomic study on the subgenus Heterorius Wagner of the genus Orius Wolff from Japan (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Jpn. J. Ent. 61(1): 11-22
  30. Yasunaga, T. 1996. Species of the Flower bug genus Orius found in Hokkaido, Japan (Insecta, Heteroptera, Anthocoridae) Journal of Hokkaido Uni. of Education (Section II B) Vol. 47(1)
  31. Yasunaga, T. 1997a. The flower bug genus Orius Wolff (Heteroptera; Anthocoridae) from Japan and Taiwan, Part I. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 32(2): 355-364 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.32.355
  32. Yasunaga, T. 1997b. The flower bug genus Orius Wolff (Heteroptera; Anthocoridae) from Japan and Taiwan, Part II. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 32(2): 379-386 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.32.379
  33. Yasunaga, T. 1997c. The flower bug genus Orius Wolff (Heteroptera; Anthocoridae) from Japan and Taiwan, Part III. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 32(2): 387-394 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.32.387

Cited by

  1. Molecular phylogeny and evolutionary habitat transition of the flower bugs (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) vol.57, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.09.013
  2. Annotated catalog, biological notes and diagnoses of the flower bugs (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae sensu lato) in the Korean Peninsula vol.16, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2013.04.013
  3. Taxonomic review of the genus Orius (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) in the Korean Peninsula vol.14, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2010.11.014
  4. Biological Control of Insect Pests with Arthropod Natural Enemies on Greenhouse Sweet Pepper in Winter Cropping System vol.49, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.4.385
  5. Preliminary Molecular Identification of a Predatory Bug,Orius albidipennis, Collected from Ornamental Plants vol.13, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1673/031.013.1101
  6. A Case Study for Intergrated Pest Management of Frankliniella occidentalis and Aphis gossypii by Simultaneously Using Orius laevigatus and Aphidius colemani with Azoxystrobin in Cucumber Plants vol.52, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2013.11.0.077
  7. The flower bug genusOriusWolff, 1811 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Anthocoridae: Oriini) of Thailand vol.50, pp.17-18, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2015.1104393