대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제46권2호
  • /
  • Pages.193-200
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

상악피개의치를 위한 임플랜트의 위치에 따른 응력분포에 대한 유한요소분석

FINITE ELEMENT STRESS ANALYSIS OF MAXILLARY TWO IMPLANTS-RETAINED OVERDENTURE ACCORDING TO POSITION OF IMPLANT FIXTURES

  • 하헌석 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김창회 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임영준 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김명주 (서울대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실)
  • Ha, Heon-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

임플랜트 고정체의 표면처리 기술의 발달에 기인하여 골유착의 성공률이 좋아지고 있으며 임플랜트를 이용하는 보철물의 형태와 임상 술 식도 다양하게 발전되고 있다. 상악의 임플랜트 피개의치는 아직 표준화된 치료법에 대한 의견이 분분하다. 본 연구는 상악 무치악의 치료를 위하여 해부학적인 요소와 생역학적인 요소를 고려하여 양측 견치부 또는 소구치부위에 2개의 임플랜트를 식립할 때의 응력분포를 삼차원 유한요소분석을 이용하여 관찰하고자 하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 임플랜트를 양측 견치 부위에 식립한 모형에서 부하가 가해지는 우측의 임플랜트의 원심면에 최대 응력이 집중되었다. 2. 임플랜트를 양측 제2소구치 부위에 식립한 모형에서 임플랜트 주위의 응력 분포는 부하지점의 거리와 상관없이 고르게 나타났다. 3. 치조골에 발생하는 응력 분포의 관찰 결과, 임플랜트가 양측 제2소구치 부위에 식립된 모형이 양측 견치부위에 식립된 모형보다 고르게 나타났다. 이상의 결과로 볼 때, 상악 피개의치를 위한 임플랜트 식립 위치는 견치 부위에서보다 제2소구치 부위가 구강점막, 주위 골과 임플랜트에 전달되는 응력의 분포에 유리한 것으로 사료된다.

Statement of problem: There have been a few studies about unsplinted implant retainted maxillary overdenture. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different position of implant for 2 implants-retained maxillary overdenture. Materials and methods: Three-dimensional finite element models were used to reproduce an edentulous human maxilla with an implant-retained overdenture. Two implants in the canine tooth positions on both side and in the second premolar tooth positions on both side models were examined. Axial loads of 100 N were applied to the occlusal surface at the right first molar tooth positions. Maximum stress at the implant-bone interface and stress at the cortical bone surface just under the loading point were observed. Results and conclusion: Within the limits of this study, maximum stresses were concentrated around implant of canine position at loading side. The second premolar area was thought to be more favorable to distribution of stress on mucosa, alveolar bone and implants than canine area for maxillary overdenture.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:5-8 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121203
  2. Mojon P, Thomason JM, Walls AW. The impact of falling rates of edentulism. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:434-40
  3. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:601-2
  4. Carr AB, McGiveny GP, Brown DT:Support for the distal extension denture base, in McCracken's Removable Partial Prosthodontics (ed 11). St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 2005;287-99
  5. Pietrokovski J, Starinsky R, Arensburg B, Kaffe I. Morphologic Characteristics of bony edentulous jaws. J Prosthodont 2007;16:141-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00165.x
  6. Rodriguez AM, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function. Ann Periodont 2000;5:101-8 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.101
  7. Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:253-62
  8. Meriske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11:108-25 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x
  9. Kim HS, Shin SW. Three-dimensional analysis of the normal dentition and edentulous maxilla of Koreans. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:191-203
  10. Kydd WL, Daly CH, Wheeler JB 3rd. The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. Int Dent J. 1971;21:430-41
  11. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:144-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.018
  12. Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:350-6 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00872.x
  13. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Carol Srream, 2002, Quintessence Publishing. pp 326-31
  14. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter S, Weinstein RL. Analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with two opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-29
  15. Naert I, De Clercg M, Theuniers G, Schepers E. Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for edentulous mandible: A 2.5-years report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:191-6
  16. Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Brantly WA, A threedimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant place in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont 1995;4:98-100
  17. Tanino F, Hayakawa I, Hirano S, Minakuchi S. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Int J Prosthondont 2007;20:193-8
  18. Kwak HH, Yoon HR, Hu KS, Kang MK, Park HD, Koh KS et al. Topography of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Korean J Phys Anthrop 2001;14:137-49 https://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2001.14.2.137
  19. Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H, Iizuka T. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery-clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone. 2005;37:776-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.019
  20. Wada S, Wakabayashi N, Tanaka T, Ohyama T. Influence of abutment selection in maxillary Kennedy Class II RPD on elastic stress distribution in oral mucosa: an FEM study. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:89-94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00080.x
  21. Cavallaro JS Jr, Tarnow DP. Unsplinted implants retaining maxillary overdentures with partial palatal coverage: report of 5 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:808-14