References
- Canfield, R. V. (1986). Cost optimization of periodic preventive maintenance, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 35, 78-81 https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.1986.4335355
- Jiang, R. and Ji, P. (2002). Age Replacement policy: A multi-attribute value model, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 76, 311-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00021-2
- Jung, G. M. (2002). Optimal replacement policy for a repairable system with combination warranty, The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 15, 107-117 https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2002.15.1.107
- Jung, K. M. (2008). Optimization of cost and downtime for periodic PM model following the expiration of warranty, Journal of Korean Data & Information Science Society, 19, 587-596
- Jung, K. M., Han, S. S. and Park, D. H. (2008). Optimization of cost and downtime for replacement model following the expiration of warranty, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93, 995-1003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.05.005
- Jung, G. M. and Park, D. H. (2003). Optimal maintenance policies during the postwarranty period, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 82, 173-185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00144-3
- Lin, D., Zuo, M. J. and Yam, R. C. M. (2000). General sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models, International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 7, 253-266
- Malik, M. A. K. (1979). Reliable preventive maintenance scheduling, IIE Transactions, 11, 221-228 https://doi.org/10.1080/05695557908974463
- Nakagawa, T. (1986). Periodic and sequential preventive maintenance policies, Journal of Applied Probability, 23, 536-542 https://doi.org/10.2307/3214197
- Nakagawa, T. (1988). Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance policies, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 37, 295-298 https://doi.org/10.1109/24.3758
- Sahin, I. and Polatoglu, H. (1996). Maintenance strategies following the expiration of warranty, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 45, 220-228 https://doi.org/10.1109/24.510805
- Wu, S. and Clements-Croome, D. (2005). Preventive maintenance models with random maintenance quality, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 90, 99-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.03.012