DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preconcentration of Ultra Trace Amounts Bismuth in Water Samples Using Cloud Point Extraction with Na-DDTC and Determination by Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (ET-AAS)

Na-DDTC로 흐림점 추출을 사용한 물시료에서 초미량 비스머스의 예비농축

  • Moghimi, Ali (Department of Chemistry, Varamin Campus Islamic Azad University)
  • Published : 2008.04.20

Abstract

.A new approach for a cloud point extraction-electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometric method was used for determining bismuth. The aqueous analyte was acidified with sulfuric acid (pH 3.0-3.5). Triton X-114 was added as a surfactant and natriumdiethyldithiocarbaminat (Na-DDTC) was used as a complexing agent. After phase separation at 50oC based on the cloud point separation of the mixture, the surfactant-rich phasen was diluted using tetrahydrofuran (THF). Twenty microliters (20 L) of the enriched solution and 10 l of 0.1% (w/v) Pd(NO3)2 as chemical modifier were dispersed into the graphite tube and the analyte determined by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. After optimizing extraction conditions and instrumental parameters, a preconcentration factor of 195 was obtained for a sample of only 10 mL. The detection limit was 0.04 ng ml-1 and the analytical curve was linear for the concentration range of 0.04-0.70 ng mL-1. Relative standard deviations were <5%. The method was successfully applied for the extraction and determination of bismuth in water samples.

추출- 전열 원자 흡수 분광법에 대한 새로운 시도가 비스머스 측정에 사용되었다.수용액 분석물은 황산으로 산성화하였다(pH 3.0-3.5). Triton X-114는 계면활성제로 가하였고, natriumdiethyldithiocarbaminat(Na-DDTC)는 착체 시약으로 사용했다. 혼합물의 흐림점 분리를 기저로한 50oC에서 상분리 후에 많은 계면활성제는 tetrahydrofuran(THF)로 희석했다. 농축 용액의 20L와 화학개질제로 0.1% (w/v) Pd(NO3)2를 10? 그라파이트 튜브안으로 분산시켰다. 분석물은 전열 원자 흡수 분광법으로 측정했다. 추출 조건과 기기 파라메타의 최적화 후에 195의 예비농축 인자를 10mL의 시료에서 얻었다. 검출한계는 0.04 ng ml1 분석곡선은 0.04-0.70 ng mL1의 농도범위에서 선형을 얻었다. 상대표준편차는 5% 보다 적었다. 이 방법은 성공적으로 추출과 물시료에서 비스머스 추출과 검출에 적용되었다.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Bismuth has been associated with medicine for more than 200 years. The element was first introduced in a pharmaceutical used in the treatment of syphilis.1 Presently, bismuth is used in the cosmetics industry for the preparation of creams and hair dyes, while some of its colloidal salts (subcitrate and subgallate), due to their antiseptic, astringent and diuretic properties, have important applications in pharmaceutical preparations and are employed as anti-ulcer, antibacterial, anti-HIV and radiotherapeutic agents.2 Although there is little possibility of poisoning from bismuth as used in industrial applications, there have been several reported cases of nephrotoxic and neurotoxic symptoms from the use of bismuth-containing pharmaceuticals.3-5 These cases underscore the necessity for methods to determine bismuth.

Several sensitive methods have been developed for determination of bismuth. These include hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry,6 electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry,7 atomic fluorescence spectrometry,8 hydride generation inductively-coupled plasma spectrometry,9 hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry10,11 electrothermal vaporization inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry,12 potentiometric stripping analysis,13 anodic stripping voltammetry,14-16 cathodic stripping voltammetry17 and adsorptive stripping voltammetry.18 However, direct determination of trace amounts of metals in seawater and biological materials is difficult. This is because of low concentrations of trace amounts of metals and strong interference from the sample matrix. Preconcentration addresses both of these problems. There are a lot of methods for preconcentration and separation, such as liquidliquid extraction19-21 and solid phase extraction.22-28

The use of surfactants in analytical chemistry is providing many new possibilities29,30 separation/preconcentration based on cloud point extraction (CDE) is emerging as an important practical technique. The cloud point extraction technique is based on the fact most nonionic surfactants form micelles in aqueous solutions and become turbid when they are heated beyond a temperature called the cloud point temperature (tc). Above tc, the micellar solution separates into two phases: a surfactant-rich phase of small volume and a diluted aqueous phase, in which the surfactant concentration is close to the critical micellar concentration (cmc). Any analyte solubilized in the hydrophobic core of the micelles will separate and become concentrated in the small volume of the surfactant-rich phase. The small volume of the surfactant-rich phase permits the design of simple, efficient, inexpensive extraction schemes that do not involve the use of toxic organic solvents. Accordingly, any species that interacts with the micellar system, either directly (generally hydrophobic organic compounds) or after a prerequisite derivatization reaction (e.g. metal ions after reaction with a suitable hydrophobic ligand) may be extracted from the initial solution and thus also be preconcentrated.29

When cloud point extraction is used for the extraction of metal chelates, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) is by far the most frequently used technique for analyte detection. Although FAAS provides fast throughput, techniques of higher sensitivity would improve considerably detection limits for several analytes. In this sense, electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry is an efficient alternative, particularly because the organic matrix, consisting of the surfactant and residual organic substances from the digested material, can be eliminated during the gradual increase in temperature prior to the atomization of the analyte.

The aim of this work is to introduce a reliable method for determination of bismuth in tap water samples by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry after preconcentration by the cloud point extraction technique. Preconcentration of a 10 mL sample solution allowed an enrichment factor approaching 195, which compares favorably with other CPE methodologies.31-50

 

EXPERIMENTAL

Apparatus

The experiments were performed using a Shimadzu atomic absorption spectrometer (AA 6800G) with a graphite furnace atomizer (GFA-6500), and an autosampler (ASC-6100). A bismuth hollow cathode lamp (Hamamatsu Photonics, L233 Series), operated at a current of 10mA and a wavelength of 223.1 nm with a spectral band- pass of 0.5 nm was used. Pyrolytic graphite-coated graphite tubes (P/N 206-69984-02) were purchased from Shimadzu. The sample injection volume was 20 μL in all experiments. The instrumental parameters and temperature programme for the graphite atomizer are listed in Table 1. Argon 99.995% purchased from Roham Gas Co. (Tehran, Iran) was used as sheath gas. A thermostated bath (Fison, model HAKKE-N3) maintained at the desired temperature, was used for cloud point preconcentration experiments and phase separation was assisted using a centrifuge.

Table 1.aPd(NO3)2 as a modifier was used and the integration time was 3 s.

Reagents

Analytical-grade reagents and deionized doubly distilled water were used. The nonionic surfactant Triton X-114 (Sigma) was used without further purification. Stock solution of bismuth was prepared from Merck Titrasol standard solutions (Bi(NO3)3) in 5% HNO3. Working standard solutions were obtained by appropriate dilution of the stock standard solution.

A solution of 5×104 M Na-DDTC(Merck) was prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of this reagent in THF (Merck). Sulfuric acid (Merck) purchased and used in order to adjust pH. A 0.1% (w/v) chemical modifier solution was prepared by diluting palladium stock solution (10 g L-1, Merck). The materials and vessels used for trace analysis were kept in a chromic acid mixture (saturated K2Cr2O7 in concentrated H2SO4) for at least 1 h and were subsequently rinsed four times with deionized doubly distilled water before use.

Cloud point preconcentration procedure

For the cloud point preconcentration, 10 ml aliquots of the sample or analyte standard (0.04-0.70 ng mL-1), Triton X-114 (0.05% (w/v), Na-DDTC (5×10-6M) and sulfuric acid (pH 3.0-3.5), were kept in a thermostated bath at 50 ℃ for 5 min. Separation of the aqueous and surfactant-rich phases was accomplished by centrifugation for 10 min at 3500 rpm. After cooling in an ice-NaCl mixture (5 min), the surfactant-rich phase became viscous. The aqueous supernatant phase was then separated completely by a 5-ml syringe centered in the tube. To decrease the viscosity of the surfactant-rich phase and facilitate sample handling, 50 μL of THF was added and 20 μL of the final solution plus 10 μL of Pd(NO3)2 (0.1% (w/v)) as chemical modifier was injected to the graphite furnace by autosampler.

Preparation of Water samples

Water samples were filtered using a 0.45 μm pore size membrane filter to remove suspended particulate matter, adjusted to the pH of about 3.0-3.5 by adding diluted H2SO4 and stored in a refrigerator in the dark. Aliquots (8 ml) of water samples were subjected to the cloud point extraction methodology as described above.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Optimization of the furnace conditions

To reduce interferences and to increase accuracy, the use of a chemical modifier has become indispensable for stabilization of volatile elements during the pretreatment step. The main purpose of using a modifier or a modifier mixture in ET-AAS is to stabilize relatively volatile elements so that higher permissible pyrolysis temperatures can be used to efficiently volatilize the matrix components in a sample prior to atomization of the analyte.52-57 By using higher pyrolysis temperatures, less interference are encountered in the atomization step.52

Fig. 1.Pyrolysis and atomization temperature curves after preconcentration. Initial bismuth concentration is 0.5 ng mL-1.

In these experiments we used Pd (10 μg) as a modifier. When Pd was not added, the loss of bismuth was observed at pyrolysis temperatures higher than 450 ℃. The influence of the palladium on the background level and atomic signal was of utmost importance. Addition of a 0.1% (w/v) Pd(NO3)2 solution, allowed increasing the pyrolysis temperature to 1150 ℃ with considerable background reduction without losses of bismuth (Fig. 1).

The atomic signals were enhanced by 35% when Pd injected volume was increased from 5 to 10 μL. For aliquots larger than 10 μL, the signals were not further improved. The modifier volume was thus chosen as 10 μL.

Effect of pH

CPE of bismuth was performed in solutions of pH ranging from 0.5 to 9.5. Separation of metal ions by cloud point method involves the prior formation of a complex with suf- ficient hydrophobicity to be extracted in to the small volume of surfactantrich phase. Extraction recovery depends on the pH at which complex formation occurs.

Fig. 2 shows the effect of pH on the extraction of bismuth complex. It was found that in the pH range 2.5-6.0, extraction was quantitative. Extraction recovery of bismuth will decrease at 6

Fig. 2.Effect of pH on the extraction recovery of bismuth. Applied condition is of 0.5 ng mL-1 Bi, 5×10-6 M Na-DDTC, 0.05% (w/v) Triton X-114 and 1% THF.

Effect of Na-DDTC concentration

The extraction recovery as a function of the Na-DDTC concentration is shown in Fig. 3. For this study, 10mL of a solution containing 0.5 ng ml-1 bismuth in 0.05% (w/v) Triton X-114 with various amounts of Na-DDTC was subjected to the cloud point preconcentration process. At this stated concentration of bismuth, ~100% extraction was achieved for a Na-DDTC concentration of 0.8×10-6 M. A concentration of 5×10-6 M Na-DDTC was chosen for subsequent experiments.

Fig. 3.Effect of Na-DDTC concentration on the extraction recovery of bismuth. Utilized condition is of 0.5 ng mL-1 Bi, 0.05% (w/v) Triton X-114, 1% THF, pH 3.0-3.5.

Effect of Triton X-114 concentration

A successful cloud point extraction should be able to maximize the extraction efficiency through minimizing the phase volume ratio (Vorg/Vaqueous), so as to improve the preconcentration factor. Triton X-114 was chosen as the nonionic surfactant due to its low cloud point temperature and high density, which facilitates phase separation by centrifugation. Fig. 4 highlights the effect of the surfactant concentration in the range of 0.04-0.25% (w/v) on the extraction efficiency. Triton X-114 was found to quantitatively extract the Bi-DDTC complex from the aqueous sample at surfactant concentrations above 0.05%, using a single step extraction procedure. Using more than 0.05% of surfactant, the analytical sensitivity decreased due to dilution of the sample by additional surfactant solution.

Fig. 4.Extraction recovery of the bismuth as a function of Triton X-114 concentration. Applied condition is of 0.5 ng mL-1 Bi, 5×10-6 M Na-DDTC, 1% THF, pH 3.0-3.5.

Selection of the dilution agent for the surfactantrich phase

High viscosity of the surfactant-rich phase (~20 cP) is drastically decreased using diluting agents. Different solvents such as methanol, ethanol and acidic solutions of methanol and ethanol were tried. None of these solvents could dissolve the extracted phase completely. However, THF dissolved the surfactant-rich phase and the extracted materials (complex of bismuth and excess of Na-DDTC) completely and the best results were obtained with this diluent.

Effect of THF concentration

Fig. 5 shows the effect of THF concentration on extraction efficiency. It was found that the extraction efficiency decreased at THF concentrations >3% due to dissolution of the surfactant phase and a decrease in the volume of this phase. Hence, a relatively concentrated solution (5×10-4 M) of Na-DDTC in THF was used.

Fig. 5.Effect of THF concentration on the extraction recovery of bismuth. Utilized condition is of 0.5 ng mL-1 Bi, 5×10-6 M Na-DDTC, 0.05% (w/v) Triton X-114, pH 3.0-3.5.

Effect of equilibration temperature and time

The equilibration temperature above the cloud point and the incubation time were also optimized. The shortest incubation time and the lowest possible equilibration temperature are desired. The results, illustrated in Fig. 6 show excellent recoveries for equilibration temperature from 40 to 60 ℃.

Fig. 6.Effect of equilibration temperature on the extraction recovery of bismuth. Applied condition is of 0.5 ng mL-1 Bi, 5 × 106 M Na-DDTC, 0.05% (w/v) Triton X-114, 1% THF, pH 3.0-3.5.

Higher temperature lead to the decomposition of Na-DDTC and the reduction of extraction yield. A temperature of 50 ℃ was hence used in all experiments. The dependence of extraction efficiency upon incubation time was studied in the range of 5-20 min. An incubation time of 5 min was sufficient for quantitative extraction.

Interferences

Bismuth(III) ions produce an orange-brown complex with Na-DDTC, Bi(HD2)3, which is stable over the pH range 2.5-6.0. Na-DDTC is known to be highly selective for bismuth at pH 3.0-3.5.58 Only lead, thallium and cadmium can be co-extracted with bismuth but their dithizonates are unstable in slightly acidic medium (pH 3.0-3.5). The noble metals (Pt, Pd, Au, Ag, and Hg) and copper are quantitatively extracted with Na-DDTC at pH 0.5-1.0. The results of the interference study are shown in Table 2; it will be seen that bismuth recovery was essentially quantitative in the presence of foreign cations. Therefore these ions produce no interference in the extraction of bismuth.

Table 2.Effect of foreign ions on the preconcentration and determination of bismuth (0.3 ng mL-1)

Characteristics of the method

A calibration curve was constructed by preconcentration of 10 ml of sample standard solutions with Triton X-114. Table 3 shows the analytical characteristics of the method. Under the optimum experimental conditions, the calibration curve for bismuth was linear from 0.05 to 0.70 ng mL-1.

Table 3.aBismuth concentration was 0.3 ng mL-1 for which the R.S.D. was obtained. bDetermined as three times of the standard deviation of the blank signal. cCalculated as the ratio of slope of preconcentrated samples to that obtained without preconcentration.

The enhancement factor of about 195 was obtained by preconcentration a 10ml of sample. The limit of detection was calculated to be 0.04 ng ml-1 (S/N=3). If samples with volumes larger than 20 μl are injected into graphite furnace, sensitivity can be increased but in all experiments we injected 20 μl of analyte, because, otherwise sample may spread to the low-temperature areas of the furnace, or may overflow to the filler port that results in decreased accuracy.

Analysis of real samples

In order to validate the proposed methodology, the developed procedure was applied to the determination of bismuth in tap water, and some waste water samples. Various water samples were also analysed (Table 4) in all cases the spike recoveries were excellent, showing no matrix interferences.

Table 4.aMean of three experiments ± standard deviation. bFrom drinking water system of Saveh, Iran. cFrom Rain water of Varamin, Iran.

The analytical results shown in Table 4 demonstrate that the results by using the present method are consistent with those obtained by ICP-MS.

 

CONCLUSIONS

We have proposed the use of cloud point extraction as an alternative method for the preconcentration of Bi as a prior step to its determination by ETAAS. The method allows the determination of ultra low levels of Bi by ET-AAS.

The methodology offers a simple, rapid, sensitive, low cost, good extraction efficiency and lower toxicity than those using organic solvents. Environmental pollution is limited to a small amount of surfactant. The method gives a low limit of detection and good R.S.D.

Compared with other methods, interference from other cations is minor. The proposed method can be applied for the determination of bismuth in tap water .

References

  1. Bertholf, R. L.; Renoe, B. W. Anal. Chim. Acta 1982, 139, 287 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)94006-1
  2. Burguera, M.; Burguera, J. L.; Rondon, C.; Garcia, M. I. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2001, 16, 1190 https://doi.org/10.1039/b103162g
  3. Burguera, J. L.; Burguera, M.; Rivas, C.; Rondon, C.; Carrera, P.; Gallignani, M. Talanta 1999, 48, 885 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(98)00298-7
  4. Thomas, D. W.; Hartley, T. F.; Coyle, P.; Sobecki, S. Handbook on Toxicity of Inorganic Compounds, Marcel Decker, New York, 1987, p. 15
  5. Thomas, D. W. Bismuth, in: E. Merian (Ed.), Metals and their Compounds in the Environment, VCH, Weinheim, 1991, p. 789
  6. Ribeiro, A. S.; Arruda, M. A. Z.; Cadore, S. Spectrochim. Acta B 2002, 57, 2113 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0584-8547(02)00173-8
  7. Acar, O.; Kllc, Z.; Rehber Turker, A. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 382, 329 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00788-0
  8. Rahman, L.; Corns, W. T.; Bryce, D. W.; Stockwell, P. B. Talanta 2000, 52, 833 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00436-7
  9. Morrow, A.; Witshire, G.; Huvsthous, A. At. Spectrosc. 1997, 18, 23
  10. Zhang, L.; Lu, Y.; Yang, G. Huaxue Fence 2000, 36, 26
  11. Feng, X.; Fu, B. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 371, 109 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00291-8
  12. Hinds, M. V.; Gregoie, D. C.; Ozaki, E. A. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1997, 12, 131 https://doi.org/10.1039/a603313j
  13. Ostapczuk, P. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 273, 35 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(93)80142-8
  14. Yang, H.-Y.; Chen, W.-Y.; Sun, I.-W. Talanta 1999, 50, 977 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00185-X
  15. Ye, R. D.; Khoo, S. B. Electroanalysis 1997, 9, 481 https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140090610
  16. Wang, C. M.; Sun, Q. Y.; Li, H. L. Electroanalysis 1997, 9, 645 https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.1140090813
  17. Ferri, T.; Paci, S.; Morabito, R. Anal. Dichim. 1996, 89, 245
  18. Hajian, R.; Shams, E. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 491, 63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00789-X
  19. Alonso, A.; Almendral, M. J.; Baez, M. D.; Porras, M. J.; Lopez Lavln, C. Garcla de Marla, Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 408, 129 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00768-0
  20. Sarkar, S. G.; Dhadke, P. M. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1999, 15, 131 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(98)00088-4
  21. Lo, J. M.; Lin, Y. P.; Lin, K. S. Anal. Sci. 1991, 7, 455
  22. Tokman, N.; Akman, S.; Ozcan, M. Talanta 2003, 59, 201 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00479-4
  23. Yamini, Y.; Chaloosi, M.; Ebrahimzadeh, H. Talanta 2002, 56, 797 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00615-4
  24. Pournaghi-Azar, M. H.; Djozan, Dj.; Abdolmohammad zadeh, H. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 437, 217 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00973-4
  25. Moyano, S.; Gasquez, J. A.; Olsina, R.; Marchevsky, E. Martinez, L. D. J. Anal. At. Speltrom. 1999, 14, 259 https://doi.org/10.1039/a807588c
  26. Silva, J. B. B.; Giacomelli, M. B. O.; Curtius, A. J. Analyst 1999, 124, 1249 https://doi.org/10.1039/a902926e
  27. Moghimi, A. "Chinese Journal of Chemistry" 2007, 25, 640 https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.200790119
  28. Kocjan, R.; Garbacka, M. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1994, 29, 799 https://doi.org/10.1080/01496399408005609
  29. Manzoori, J. L.; Bavili-Tabrizi, A. Microchem. J. 2002, 72, 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-265X(01)00113-8
  30. Moghimi, A.; Tehrani, M. S.; Waqif Husain, S. Material Science Research India 2006, 3(1a), 27 https://doi.org/10.13005/msri/031a03
  31. Garrido, M.; Di Nezio, M. S.; Lista, A. G.; Palomeque, M.; Fernández Band, B. S. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 502, 173 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.09.070
  32. Manzoori, J. L.; Karim-Nezhad, G. Anal. Sci. 2003, 19, 579 https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.19.579
  33. Nascentes, C. C.; Arruda, M. A. Z. Talanta 2003, 61, 759 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00367-9
  34. Shemirani, F.; Baghdadi, M.; Ramezani, M.; Jamalim. R.; Analytica Chimica Acta 2005, 534, 163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.06.036
  35. K. Evangelos, Paleologos, G. Athanasios, Vlessidis, I. Miltiadcs, Karayannis, P. Nicholaos, Evmiridis, Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 477, 223 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(02)01429-0
  36. Paleologos, E. K.; Giokas, D. L.; Tzouwara-Karayanni, S. M.; Karayannis, M. I. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 458, 241 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01579-3
  37. Manzoori, J. L.; Bavili-Tabrizi, A. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 470, 215 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00765-1
  38. Carasek, E.; Tonjes, J. W.; Scharf, M. Talanta 2002, 56, 185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00556-2
  39. Chen, J.; Teo, K. C. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 450, 215 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01367-8
  40. J. Chen, K.C. Teo, Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 434, 325 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)00849-2
  41. Giokas, D. L.; Paleologos, E. K.; Tzouwara-Karayanni, S. M.; Karayannis, M. I. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2001, 16, 521 https://doi.org/10.1039/b010055m
  42. Paleologos, E. K.; Stalikas, C. D.; Karayannis, M. I. Analyst 2001, 126, 389 https://doi.org/10.1039/b009521b
  43. Kim, Y. S.; Choi, Y. S.; In, K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2001, 21, 137
  44. Luconi, M. O.; Fernanda Silva, M.; Olsina, R.A.; Fernandez, L. P.; Talanta 2000, 51, 123 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00252-0
  45. Mesquita da Silva, M. A.; Frescura, V. L. A.; Curtius, A. J. Spectrochim. Acta B 2000, 52, 803
  46. Ozturk, B. D.; Filik, H.; Tutem, E.; Apak, R. Talanta 2000, 53, 263 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00382-9
  47. Zaporozhets, O.; Petruniock, N.; Sukhan, V. Talanta 1999, 50, 865 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00172-1
  48. Concepcion Cerrato Oliveros, M.; de Blas, O. J.; Pavon, J. L. P.; Cordero, B. M. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 547 https://doi.org/10.1039/a801635f
  49. Mesquita da Silva, M. A.; Azzolin Frescura, V. L.; Nome Aguilera, F. J.; Curtius, A. J. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 1369 https://doi.org/10.1039/a806309e
  50. Manzoori, J. L.; Sorouradin, M. H.; Hajishabani, A. M. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1998, 13, 305 https://doi.org/10.1039/a707520k
  51. Rjabuchin, S. Y.; Report IAEA/RL/50, Vienna, 1987
  52. He, B.; Ni, Z.-M. J. Anal. At. Spectorm. 1996, 11, 165 https://doi.org/10.1039/ja9961100165
  53. Wei-Ming, Y.; Zhe-Ming, N. Spectrochim. Acta B 1997, 52, 241 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0584-8547(96)01574-1
  54. Acar, O.; Türker, A. R.; Kilic, Z., Fresenius, J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 357, 656 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050230
  55. Shan, X.-Q.; Wen, B. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1995, 10, 791 https://doi.org/10.1039/ja9951000791
  56. Imai, S.; Hasegawe, N.; Nishiyama, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; Satio, K. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1996, 11, 601 https://doi.org/10.1039/ja9961100601
  57. Havezov, I.; Detcheva, A.; Rendl, J. Mikrochim. Acta 1995, 119, 147 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244863
  58. Marczenko, Z. Separation and Spectrophotometric Determination of Elements, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1986, p. 169

Cited by

  1. Separation and preconcentration by a cloud point extraction procedure for determination of metals: an overview vol.394, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2660-9
  2. A new voltammetric sensor based on thiol-functionalized polysiloxane film modified by lead nanoparticles for detection of Bi(III) ions vol.208, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.018