Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

  • 제38권3호
  • /
  • Pages.503-510
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 2093-2278(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-2286(eISSN)
대한치주과학회 (Korean Academy of Periodontology)
권호 표지

RBM surface 임플란트의 골형성에 대한 EPMA 분석

EPMA analysis of bone formation around RBM surface implant

  • 정환종 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 임성빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정진형 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 홍기석 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Jung, Hwan-Jong (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University) ;
  • Yim, Sung-Bin (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University) ;
  • Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University) ;
  • Hong, Ki-Seok (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University)
  • 발행 : 2008.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: To evaluate bone formation on the implant surface between machined fixture and RBM surface fixture through analyzing of distribution and concentration of Ca and P by EPMA. Material and Methods: Fixtures had divided in 2 group: Machined(Group I), RBM (Group II). Total 4 fixtures were implanted on rabbit which sacrificed on 2 week and 4 week for the histological specimens. By these specimens EPMA value were measured, compared and analysed by each group to figure out the evidence of clinical use of RBM implant. Result: After 2 weeks and 4 weeks, it was analyzed that bone formation area, distribution and concentration of Ca and P by EPMA. In distribution and concentration of P Group II was higher than Group I, but there were no statistical significances. In new bone formation area, Group II was more higher than Group I with statistically significances. Both of group, after 4 weeks area is little bit higher than after 2 weeks area but there is no statistically significances. Conclusion: RBM implant was better than machined implant on the early bone formation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R. et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Almquist and Wiksell International 1977
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  3. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: part I surgical results. J prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-457 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90237-7
  4. Ericsson I, Lekholm U. Branemark PI et al. A Clinical evaluation of fixed bridge restorations supported by the combination of tooth and osseointegrated titanium implant. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:307-312 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb02227.x
  5. Lausmaa J. Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materials. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 1996;81:343-361 https://doi.org/10.1016/0368-2048(95)02530-8
  6. Eisenbarth E, Velten D, Schenk-Meuser K et al. Interactions between cells and titanium surfaces. Biomolecular Engineering 2002;19:243-249 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0344(02)00032-1
  7. Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003;24:3893-3907 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00261-8
  8. Hobo S, Ichida E, Garcia LT. Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation Quintessence co 1989;21-32
  9. Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albreksson T. Tissue integrated prosthesis. Quintessence Publishing Co inc 1985
  10. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T. Histomorphometric studies of hydroxyapatite coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1991;6: 399-404
  11. Gottlander M, Albrektsson T. Histomorphometric study of unthreaded hydroxyapatite coated and titanium coated implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants. 1992;7:485-490
  12. Denissen H, Kalk W, Nieuport H, Maltha J, Hoofe A. Mandibular bone response to plasma-sprayed coatings of hydroxyapatite. Int Prosthodont 1990;3:53-58
  13. Oonishi H, Yamamoto M, Ishimura H et al. The effort of Hydroxyapatite coating on bone growth into porous titanium alloy implants. J Bone joint surg 1989;71:213-216
  14. Wennerberg A, Eksessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Anderson B. A 1-year follow -up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int Oral maxillofac Implant 1997;12:486-494
  15. Predecki P, Auslaender BA, Stephan JE, Mooney VL, Stanitski C. Attachment of bone to threaded implants by ingrowth and mechanical interlocking. J Biomed Mater Res 1972;6:401-412 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820060507
  16. Buser D, Schenk R, Steinemann S et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorpho-metric study in miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1991;25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  17. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants and 75um sized particles of $Al_2O_3$. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1996;30:251-260 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<251::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-P
  18. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;16(Suppl.1)1-132
  19. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;11-25
  20. Meffert RM, Langer B, Fritz ME. Dental implants: A review. J Periodontol 1992;63:859-70 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859
  21. Mayer TM, Hawley CE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. The single tooth implant: A viable alternative for single tooth replacement. J Periodontol 2002;73:687-693 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.687
  22. Lundgren S, Moy PK, Beumer JIII, Lewis S. Surgical consideration for endosseous implants in the cranial region: A 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22;272-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80514-4
  23. Gelb DA. Immediate implant surgery: Three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;13:388-399
  24. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G, Full arch restoration of the jaw with fixed ceramometal prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;13:819-825
  25. Rosenquist B, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: Implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:205-209
  26. Wilson TG Jr, Schenk R, Buser D, Cochran D. Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: A report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:333-341
  27. Tarnow DP, Fletcher P. The two-to-three month postextraction placement of root form implants: A useful compromise. Implants Clin Rev Dent 1993;2:1-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199304000-00001
  28. Buser D, Scjenk RK, Steinemann S et al. Influence of surface characteristics in bone integration titanium implants. A stomor phometic study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater 1991;25:889-902 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  29. Maurizio P, Antonio S, Michele P et al. Bone reponse to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. Oral implantol 2003;28:2-8
  30. Piattelli M, Scarno A, Paolantonio M, et al. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:2-8 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  31. Sanz A, Oyarzum A, Farias D, Diaz I. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent 2001;10:126-131 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009