Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회지)

Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Genetic Relationship between Regional Population of Hanwoo Brands (Korean Cattle) Using Microsatellite Markers

Microsatellite Marker를 이용한 한우 브랜드 집단의 유연관계와 유전적 구조 분석

  • Oh, J.D. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Kong, H.S. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Lee, J.H. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Moon, S.J. (Animal Products Grading Service) ;
  • Jeon, G.J. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Lee, H.K. (Genomic Informatics Center, Hankyong National University)
  • 오재돈 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소) ;
  • 공홍식 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소) ;
  • 이제현 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소) ;
  • 문선정 (축산물등급판정소) ;
  • 전광주 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소) ;
  • 이학교 (한경대학교 유전정보연구소)
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Nine brand populations of Hanwoo cattle were characterized using 11 microsatellite DNA markers. The studied populations were: Ansung, Yangpyang, DaeGwanryeng, Palkongsangkangwoo, Hoengseong, Jangsu, Sumjinkang, Hadong, Nam-hae. The observed heterozygosity, expected heterozygosity, and polymorphism information content were calculated. Allele frequencies were calculated and used for the characterization of each brand population and to study their genetic relationships. Genetic distances were estimated using Nei's DA genetic distance and the resultant DA matrix was used in the construction of phylogenetic trees. The NJ tree showed that Ansung and Yangpyang, Sumjinkang and Jangsu, Namhae and Ha-Dong are closely related and are considered to have undergone genetic exchange within the same locale. This study will contribute to the local Hanwoo brand industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Arranz, J. J., Bayon, Y., and San Primitivo, F. (1996) Comparison of protein markers and microsatellites in differentiation of cattle populations. Anim. Genet. 27, 415-419 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1996.tb00508.x
  2. Barker, J. S. F., Tan, S. G., Selvaraj, O. S., and Mukherjee, T. K. (1997) Genetic variation within and relationships among populations of Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim. Genet. 28, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1997.00036.x
  3. Bjornstad, G, Nilsen, N. O. and Roed, K. H. (2003) Genetic relationship between Mongolian and Norwegian horses. Anim. Genet. 34, 55-58 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2003.00922.x
  4. Lim, H. T., Min, H. S., Moon, W. G, Lee, J. B., Kim, J. H., Cho, I. C., Lee, H. K., Lee, Y. W., Lee, J. G, and Jeon, J. T. (2005) Analysis and Selection of Microsatellite Markers for Individual Traceability System in Hanwoo. J. Anim Sci. Technol. 47, 491-500 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2005.47.4.491
  5. Lee, C. and Pollak, E. J. (2002) Genetic antagonism between body weight and milk production in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 316-321
  6. Li, K., Chen, Y., Moran, C., Fan, B., Zhao, S. and Peng, Z. (2000) Analysis of diversity and genetic relationships between four Chinese indigenous pig breeds and one Australian commercial pig breed. Anim. Genet. 31, 322-325 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00649.x
  7. Mannen, H., Tsuji, S., Loftus, R. T., and Bradley, D. G. (1998) Mitochondrial DNA variation and Evolution of Japanese Black Cattle (Bos taurus). Genetics 150, 1169-1175
  8. Mannen, H., Tsuji, S., Mukai, F., Goto, N., and Ohtagaki, S. (1993) Genetic similarity using DNA fingerprinting in cattle to determine relationship coefficient. J. Hered. May-Jun; 84, 166-169 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111310
  9. Martin-Burriel, I., Garcia-Muro, E., and Zaragoza, P. (1999) genetic diversity analysis of six Spanish native cattle breeds using microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 30, 177-182 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.1999.00437.x
  10. Nei, M. (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Anim. Nat. 106, 283-297 https://doi.org/10.1086/282771
  11. Nei, M. (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and gentic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89, 583-590
  12. Nei, M., Tajima, F., and Tateno, Y. (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J. Mol. Evol. 19, 153-170 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300753
  13. Ota, T. (1993) DISPAN. Pennsylvania State University. PA. USA
  14. Peelman, L. J., Mortiaux, F., Van Zeveren, A., Dansercoer, A., Mommens, G., Coopman, F., Bouquet, Y., Burny, A., Renaville, R., and Portetelle, D. (1998) Evaluation of the genetic variability of 23 bovine microsatellite markers in four Belgian cattle breeds. Anim. Genet. Jun; 29, 161-167 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1998.00280.x
  15. Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. (1973) Numerical Taxonomy, Freeman, San Francisco, CA, USA
  16. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic tree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425
  17. 윤두학, 박응우, 이승환, 이학교, 오성종, 정일정, 홍기창. (2005) Microsatellite loci 분석에 의한 한우와 타 품종간의 유전적 유연관계, 한국동물자원과학회지 47, 341-354 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2005.47.3.341

Cited by

  1. Polymorphisms and Allele Distribution of Novel Indel Markers in Jeju Black Cattle, Hanwoo and Imported Cattle Breeds vol.22, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2012.22.12.1644
  2. Verification of ET and AI Derived Offspring Using on the Genetic Polymorphisms of Microsatellite and Coat Color Related Genes in Jeju Black Cattle vol.20, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2010.20.3.381
  3. 제주 흑우 집단에서 Indel, Microsatellite 마커와 MC1R 유전자형을 이용한 친자 확인 vol.28, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12750/jet.2013.28.3.207