MnBillnry protraction treatment of skeletal Class III children using miniplnte anchorage

Miniplate anchorage를 이용한 골격성 III급 부정교합 아동의 상악 전방견인 치료

  • Cha, Bong-Kuen (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung University) ;
  • Lee, Nam-Ki (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung University) ;
  • Choi, Dong-Soon (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung University)
  • 차봉근 (강릉대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 이남기 (강릉대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 최동순 (강릉대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2007.02.28

Abstract

The maxillary protraction headgear has been widely used in the treatment of skeletal Class III children with maxillary deficiency. A variety of treatment objectives which allow dentoalveolar movements may be established, but when only maxillary protraction without dentoalveolar movement is needed, one of the limitations in maxillary protraction with conventional tooth-borne anchorage is the loss of dental anchorage. This is because a bone remodeling occurs not only at circummaxillary sutures but also within the periodontal tissues. During protraction treatment in the mixed dentition phase, in older children or for the patient with multiple congenitally missing teeth, it is not uncommon to observe undesirable mesial movement of maxillary teeth. Such a side effect can be eliminated or minimized using absolute anchorage such as skeletal anchorage. The purpose of this case report is to introduce a new technique of the maxillary protraction headgear treatment using surgical miniplates.

상악 전방견인 장치는 골격성 III급 부정교합 특히 상악골 열성장 치료를 위해 널리 사용되고있다. 이 경우 증례에 따라 치아 치조성 이동을 허용하는 다양한 치료목표가 설정될 수 있으나, 상악골의 순수한 전방이동이 필요한 경우 다양한 구내장치를 이용하여 고정원 보강을 시도함에도 불구하고 고정원의 치아 치조성 이동을 피하기 어려운 경우가 발생된다. 이는 치아를 고정 원으로 이용하는 경우 골개조(remodeling)가 상악복합체 뿐만 아니라 치주인대에서도 발생되기 때문이다. 특히 이러한 부작용은 역동적인 치열 교환이 일어나서 치성고정원이 부족한 혼합치열기 또는 비교적 늦은 나이에 악정형 치료가 시행되는 경우에 많이 발생되게 된다. 이와 같은 부작용을 방지하기 위해 임플란트의 사용이나 피질골절단술, 신연골형성술 등의 외과적 방법을 응용하여 전방견인을 시도할 수 있으나 본고에서는 악정형적 효과를 극대화하기 위한 새로운 대안으로 골 고정원 (skeletal anchorage)을 이용한 상악 전방견인 치료의 외과적 교정적 치료 술식을 증례를 통해 소개하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim TW, Chang YI, Nahm DS. The retrospective study on the response to the face mask. Kor J Orthod. 1996;26:547-56
  2. Lee YJ, Cha KS, Lee JW. Skeletal change on the response of maxillary protraction in skeletal class III malocclusion patients. Kor J Orthod. 1998;28:533-46
  3. Hwang CJ, Kyong SH, Lim JK. The effect of maxillary protraction appliance treatment in skeletal class III malocclusion patients. 1994;24:851-60
  4. Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr., Tollaro I. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:333-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70306-3
  5. Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:583-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70003-X
  6. Kapust AJ, Sinclair PM, Turley PK. Cephalometric effects of face mas/expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:204-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70141-6
  7. Menvin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:292-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70259-2
  8. Hata S, ltoh T, Nakagawa M, Kamogashira K, Ichikawa K, Matsumoto M, Chaconas SJ. Biomechanical effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:305-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90171-5
  9. Hickham JH. Maxillary protraction therapy: diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:102-13
  10. Jackson GW, Kokich VG, Shapiro PA. Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrina. Am J Orthod 1979;75:318-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90278-1
  11. Cha BK, Park YW, Lee NK, Lee YH. The new two methods of maxillary protraction treatment: Intentional ankylosis and distraction osteogenesis. Kor J Den Asso. 2000;38:997-1007
  12. Kokich VG, Shapiro PA, Oswald R Koskinen-Moffett L, Clarren SK. Ankylosed teeth as abutments for maxillary protraction: a case report. Am J Orthod 1985;88:303-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90129-0
  13. Da Silva Filho OG, Ozawa TO, Okada CH, Okada HY, Carvalho RM. Intentional ankylosis of deciduous canines to reinforce maxillary protraction. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:315-20
  14. Smalley WM, Shapiro PA, Hohl TH, Kokich VG, Branernark PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:285-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90053-4
  15. Choi DS. Treatments of skeletal class III malocclusion patients in growing childeren using surgical method. Dent Clin. 2005;290:1194-1201
  16. Cha BK, Choi DS. Easy orthodontic treatments of growing children (17): Orthopedic treatments of class III malocclusion using skeletal anchorage. Kor J Dent Clin Orthod. 2006;5:58-65
  17. Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Uckan S. Orthopedic protraction with skeletal anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and hypodontia. Angle Orthod 2006;76:156-63
  18. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005;11:119-29 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005
  19. Petit H. Adaptation following accelerated facial-mask therapy. In: McNamara JA Jr, Ribbens KA, Howe RP editors. Clinical alteration of the growing face. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 1983. p. 253-89
  20. Lee Hs, Cha BK, Computed tomography of bone thickness of infrazygomatic crest in skeletal class III malocclusion patients in growing childeren. Kangnung University Master's Thesis. 2006
  21. Delaire J, Komposch G. Orthopadische beeinflussung des oberkieferkomplexes. In: Schmuth G editor. Kieferorthopadie I. Munchen: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1990. p. 253-88