IE interfaces (산업공학)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지

Innovative Management Strategy and Methodologies for Acquisition Programs of the Defense Weapon System

국방무기체계 획득사업의 혁신적 추진전략과 방법론

  • Lee, Sang-Heon (Department of Operations Research, Korea National Defense University) ;
  • Yoon, Bong-Kyoo (Department of Operations Research, Korea National Defense University)
  • Received : 20070700
  • Accepted : 20070800
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Under the fast technology changes and budget constraints, the organizations related to national defense face increased demands to develop innovative strategy and methodology to maximize performance with drastically reduced cost. In this context, the management of innovation and change in the defense acquisition area is vital to the Ministry of National Defense, related organizations and industries. In this paper, we discuss three comprehensive innovation strategies and methodologies for the defense acquisition area preparing for next-generation warfare; EVMS (earned value management system), PBL (performance based logistics) and SBA (simulation based acquisition). These collaborating innovative efforts enable us to tackle defense challenges for government and industries with a flexible and optimistic approach that maximizes productivity and performance with minimum cost.

Keywords

References

  1. ADD (2005), Project Management of Ground Weapon System, The 13rh Ground Weapon System Seminar
  2. Berkowirz, D., Gupta, J. N. D., Simpson, J. T., and Mcwilliams, J. B. (2005), Defining and Implementing Performance-based Logistics in Government, Defense Acquisition Review Journal, 37, 255-267
  3. Cochrane, C. B. and Schmoll, J. H. (2006), Introduction to Defense Acquisition Management, 4th Ed., Defense Systems Management College Press
  4. Cohen, W. (2000), Achieving National Performance Review Defense Acquisition Reinvention Impact Center Goals by Year 2000, Secretary of Defense
  5. Coolahan, J. E., Lutz, R. . Bernstein and Myers, S. E. (2000), Presentation to the DoD M&S Acquisition Council, Joint SBA Task Force
  6. Defense Acquisition University (DAU) (2005), Navy F-18 PBL Strategy update, Retrieved from https://acc.dau.mil/Community. Browser.aspx?id=22490& lang= en-US
  7. Jeon, J. S. (2006), TLCSM/PBL of U.S. Army and its Implications, 2006 Conf. on the Support Function Development to Support Force Integration, ROK Army Headquarters, 3-44
  8. Johnson, M., Mckeon, M., and Szanto, T. (2000), Systems Acquisition Manager's Guide For Implementing Simulation Based Acquisition, DSMC Research Fellows, draft
  9. Gansler, J. S. (1998), Modeling and Simulation in Defense Acquisition, USD (A&D)
  10. Olson, S. and Karangelen, N. (1997), SBA Road Map Phase I, A Plan for a Plan, Acquisition Division of the Industry Steering Group
  11. Patenaude, A. and Thomen, D. (1998), The Simulation, Test and Evaluation Process, Science Applications International Corporation
  12. Portmann, H. H. (1996), Study on the Application of Modeling and Simulation to the Acquisition of Major Weapon Systems, American Defense Preparedness Association(ADPA)
  13. Quentin W. Fleming and Joel M . Koppelman, (1995), Taking Step Four with Earned Value: Establish the Project Baseline, 19
  14. Sage, A. P. and Olson, S. R. (2001), Modeling and Simulation in Systems Engineering: Whether Simulation Based Acquisition?, Simulation, 76(2)
  15. Sage, A. P. and Olson, S. R. (2001), Part Il : Modeling and Simulation in Systems Engineering: Whether Simulation Based Acquisition?, Sirnulation, 76(5)
  16. Schrudder, R. O. and Lutz, R. (2005), High Level Architecture Object Model Tool Development, Simulation Interoperability Workshop
  17. Stelling, J. (2003), Planned Approach for SBA Roadmap, briefing to the Acquisition Council, Joint SBA Task Force
  18. U. S. DoD (2003), DoD Directive 5001.1, Retrieved from, https://akss.dau.mil/dag/DoD5000.asp?view=document&doc=2
  19. U. S. Government Accountability Office (2005), DoD Need to Demonstrate that Performance-Based Logistics Contracts are Achieving Expected Benefits, GAO(GAO-05-966)