DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation on flutter mechanism of long-span bridges with 2d-3DOF method

  • Yang, Yongxin (State Key Lab for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Ge, Yaojun (State Key Lab for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University) ;
  • Xiang, Haifan (State Key Lab for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University)
  • 투고 : 2006.05.08
  • 심사 : 2007.08.31
  • 발행 : 2007.10.25

초록

A two-dimensional flutter analysis method (2d-3DOF method) was developed to simultaneously investigate the relationship between oscillation parameters and aerodynamic derivatives of three degrees of freedom, and to clarify the coupling effects of different degrees of freedom in flutter instability. With this method, the flutter mechanism of two typical bridge deck sections, box girder section and two-isolated-girder section, were numerically investigated, and both differences and common ground in these two typical flutter phenomena are summarized. Then the flutter stabilization effect and its mechanism for long-span bridges with box girders by using central-slotting were studied by experimental investigation of aerodynamic stability and theoretical analysis of stabilizing mechanism. Possible explanation of new findings in the evaluation trend of critical wind speed through central vent width is finally presented.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Como, M., Ferraro, S. D. and Grimaldi, A. (2005), "A parametric analysis of the flutter instability for long span suspension bridges", Wind Struct., 8(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2005.8.1.001
  2. Ding, Q.S., Chen, A.R. and Xiang, H.F. (2002), "A state space method for coupled flutter analysis of long-span bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 14(4), 491-504 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2002.14.4.491
  3. Fung, Y.C. (1993), An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity, Dover Publications, New York.
  4. Ge, Y.J. et al. (2003), Study of Aerodynamic Performance and Vibration Control of Xihoumen Bridge (in Chinese), Technical Report of the State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, No. WT200320.
  5. Hua, X. G., Chen, Z. Q., Ni, Y. Q. and Ko, J. M. (2007), "Flutter analysis of long-span bridges using ANSYS", Wind Struct., 10(1), 61-82 https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2007.10.1.061
  6. Larsen, A. (1993), "Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624m suspension bridge across the Great Belt", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 48, 261-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90141-A
  7. Larsen, A. and Astiz, M.A. (1998), "Aeroelastic consideration for the Gibraltar Bridge feasibility study", Bridge Aerodynamics, Larsen & Esdahl (eds), Balkema, Rotterdam, 165-173.
  8. Matsumoto, M., Kobayashi, Y., Niihara, Y., Shirato, H. and Hamasaki, H. (1995), "Flutter mechanism and its stabilization of bluff bodies", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Wind Engineering, New Delhi, 827-837.
  9. Matsumoto, M. (2000), "Flutter classification of bridge girders", Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Wind and Structures for the 21st Century, Cheju, Korea, 39-79.
  10. Richardson, J.R. (1981), The Development of the Concept of the Twin Suspension Bridge, National Maritime Institute, NMIR125.
  11. Sato, H., Toriumi, R. and Kusakabe, T. (2001), "Aerodynamic characteristics of slotted box girders", Bridges into the 21st Century, 721-728.
  12. Selberg, A. (1963), "Aerodynamic effect on suspension bridges", Proceedings of International Symposium on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Teddington, England, 2, 462-486.
  13. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R.H. (1996), Wind Effects on Structures (3rd Edition), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  14. Walshe, D.E., Twidle, G.G. and Brown, W.C. (1997), "Static and dynamic measurements on a model of a slender bridge with perforated deck", International Conference on the Behaviour of Slender Structures, The City University, London, England.
  15. Xiang, H.F. and Zhang, R.X. (1999), "On mechanism of flutter and unified flutter theory of bridges", In Larsen, Larose & Livesey (eds), Wind engineering into 21st century, Rotterdam, Balkema.
  16. Xiang, H.F. et al. (2003), Wind Resistance Study on Runyang Suspension Bridge across Yangtze River, Technical Report of the State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, No. WT200005.
  17. Xiang, H.F. and Ge, Y.J. (2003), "On aerodynamic limit to suspension bridges", Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Texas, USA, 65-80.
  18. Yang, Y.X. (2002), Two-Dimensional Flutter Mechanism and its Applications for Long-Span Bridges (in Chinese), Ph.D Thesis Supervised by H.F. Xiang, and Y.J. Ge, Tongji University, China.
  19. Yang, Y.X., Ge, Y.J. and Xiang, H.F. (2002), "Coupling effects of degrees of freedom in flutter instability of long-span bridges", Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Advances in Wind and Structures, Busan, Korea, 625-632.
  20. Yang, Y.X., Ge, Y.J. and Xiang, H.F. (2003), "3DOF coupling flutter analysis for long-span bridges", Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Texas, USA, 925-932.

피인용 문헌

  1. Flutter Characteristics of Thin Plate Sections for Aerodynamic Bridges vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001165
  2. Practical Diagrammatical Technique for 3-DOF Bridge Flutter Analysis vol.19, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000626
  3. Aerodynamic instability performance of twin box girders for long-span bridges vol.145, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.014
  4. System Decoupling Approach for 3-DOF Bridge Flutter Analysis vol.141, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001129
  5. Flutter performance of long-span suspension bridges under non-uniform inflow vol.21, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217713926
  6. Insight into coupled forced vibration method to identify bridge flutter derivatives vol.22, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.22.3.273
  7. Aerodynamic Flutter Control for Typical Girder Sections of Long-Span Cable-Supported Bridges vol.12, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2009.12.3.205
  8. Effects of types of bridge decks on competitive relationships between aerostatic and flutter stability for a super long cable-stayed bridge vol.28, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2019.28.4.255
  9. A new alternative revised step-by-step flutter analysis vol.196, pp.None, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104027
  10. Wind-Induced Stability of a Cable-Stayed Bridge with Double Main Spans of 1,500 m and a Twin-Box Section vol.25, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001501
  11. Experimental studies on the aerodynamic performance of two box girders with side openings vol.30, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.30.2.119
  12. Experimental Uncertainty Quantification of Flutter Derivatives for a PK Section Girder and Its Application on Probabilistic Flutter Analysis vol.25, pp.7, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001567
  13. Wind characteristics and flutter performance of a long-span suspension bridge located in a deep-cutting gorge vol.233, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111841
  14. Tropical-cyclone-wind-induced flutter failure analysis of long-span bridges vol.132, pp.None, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105933