한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제27권7호
  • /
  • Pages.592-608
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

중학생의 힘의 개념변화 사례 연구: 개념생태적 접근

A Case Study of Middle School Students' Conceptual Change on the Concept of Force: Conceptual Ecological Approach

  • 발행 : 2007.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 힘 개념에 대한 중학생의 개념생태 요소를 탐색하고 개념변화의 사례를 살펴보는 데 그 목적이 있었다. 연구는 질적 방법을 사용하였으며, 수업관찰과 면담으로 수행되었다. 연구 참여자는 중학생 11명으로 여학생 7명과 남학생 4명이었다. 면담은 힘단원의 수업 시작 전 사전 검사와 2차레 개별 심층 면담으로 이루어졌다. 수집된 자료는 모두 전사되고 해석적으로 분석되었다. 연구 결과는 두 부분으로 기술되었다. 첫째, 연구 참여 학생들의 힘 개념을 구성하는 개념생태는 크게 인식론적 확신근거(일방향 및 상호작용적 설명 일관성), 비유(속성, 작용), 형이상학적 신념(인간중심의 존재론, 물활론, 인과적 추론, 혼합형), 과거 경험의 네 범주로 분류할 수 있었다. 둘째, 학생들의 개념변화의 대표적인 유형으로, 개념의 안정 상태와 개념변화로의 과도기 상태를 보여주는 사례를 제시하였고, 개념생태의 특정을 살펴보았다. 이 연구의 결과는 중학생의 힘 개념의 위치와 변화 가능성에 대하여 개념생태를 통하여 구조적이고 상호 연관적 이해를 추구한다는 점에서 기존 연구 결과를 통합적 관점에서 볼 수 있도록 해 준다. 뿐만 아니라 개념생태의 진화적 관점으로 개념 변화를 추구해야 할 것으로 시사한다.

This study explored the types of conceptual change of 'force' within middle school students' conceptual ecologies. This qualitative study was implemented with the use of classroom observations and two interviews with the participants. 11 middle school students (7 females and 4 males) joined in this study. The interviews with the participants were conducted individually before and after the 'force' unit. The collected data were all transcribed and analyzed interpretively. The results of this study consisted of two parts. First, the participants' conceptual ecologies of 'force' were categorized into 4: epistemological commitments (fixed or interactional explanatory consistency), analogy (attribute, working), metaphysical beliefs (people-oriented ontology, animism, causationism, mixed), and past experiences. Second, two representative cases including 'stable' and 'transitional' states were explained based on the interactions within their own conceptual ecologies. We can see students' conceptions with the integrated perspective in the sense that this results tried to get contextual and interactional understandings of the status of the conception and the possibilities of conceptual change. In addition, it implied that conceptual change research should have the perspective of conceptual ecology evolution in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 권성기 (1997). 대학생의 운동학 그래프 작성에 대한 역학 개념의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(4), 383-393
  2. 박종원.서정아.정병훈.박승재 (1994). 힘과 운동 개념 변화를 위한 연역 논리 과제에 대한 중학생의 반응 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 14(2), 133-142
  3. 박지연.이경호 (2004). 과학개념변화 연구에서 학생의 개념에 대한 이해: 오개념(misconception)에서 정신모형(metal model)까지. 한국과학교육학회지, 24, 621-637
  4. 박지연.이경호.신종호.송상호 (2006). 과학수업 후 변하는 것과 변하지 않는 것: 정신모형 이론을 중심으로 한 고등학생의 원운동 개념변화 사례 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(4), 475-491
  5. 백성혜.조영진 (2006). 과학사에 기초한 물체의 운동에 대한 고등학생들의 관점 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), 317-329
  6. 송현미.정완호 (2001). 생물 존재 필요성에 대한 중학생의 개념생태 특징. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(4), 648-657
  7. 신상우.김연수.권재술 (2005). 작용.반작용 과제에서 불일치현상에 대면한 실업계 고등학생의 인지갈등 특성. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(5), 571-582
  8. 신우성.김익균 (1993). 힘과 운동 개념에 대한 국내.외의 연구결과와 동향. 물리교육, 11, 10-22
  9. 오원근.박승재 (1995). '힘' 용어에 대한 일상적 용례연구. 물리교육, 13, 110-118
  10. 이미숙.이길재 (2006). 과학사에 근거한 학생들의 진화 개념 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(1), 25-39
  11. 이상하 (2004). 개념적 전환 장치의 설계 - 힘 개념의 교육을 통해 본 과학의 일상성과 이론성 - 철학연구, 66, 121-145
  12. 임정수, 권재술 (1996). 개념제시자의 특성이 고등학생의 물리 개념 변화에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 16(4), 340-350
  13. 오준영 (2006). 천문 현상들을 설명하는 예비 초등 교사들의 정신모형에 관한 연구: Vosniadou의 이론적인 틀 중심. 부산대학교 박사학위논문
  14. 한국교원대학교 물리교육연구실 (1993). 과학 오개념 편람(역학편)
  15. Beeth, M. E. (1993). Dynamic aspects of conceptual change instruction. Unpuglished doctoral thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison
  16. Chinn, C. A. & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of an taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
  17. Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Learnings' mental models of metallic bonding: A cross-age study. Science Education, 87(5), 685-707 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10059
  18. Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge, Educational Psychologist, 33, 109-128 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_5
  19. Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of srudents' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60 https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268308559904
  20. Driver, R., Guesnes, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas sciscience. Philadelphia: Open University Press
  21. Duit, R. (1993). Research on students' conceptions developments and trends, Paper presented at the Third Internationals Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University
  22. Gilbert, J. K., & Swift, D. J. (1985). Towards a Lakatosian analysis of the Piagetian and alternative conceptions research programs, Science Education, 69(5), 681-696 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690510
  23. Gilili, I., & Bar, V. (1992) Motion implies the force: Where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 14, 63-81 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140107
  24. Hashweh, M. (1986). Toward an explanation of conceptual change. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 229-249 https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528860080301
  25. Hewson, P. W. (1982). A case study of conceptual change in special relativity: The influence of prior knowledge in learning. European Journal of Science Education, 4, 61-78 https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528820040108
  26. Hewson, P. W. (1985). Epistemological commitments in the learning of science: Examples from dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 163-172 https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070207
  27. Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. A'B. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051837
  28. Hewson, P. W., & Hennessey, M. G. A'B. (1991). Making status explicit: A case study of conceptual change, IN R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.). Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 176-187). Kiel. Germany: IPN
  29. Hewson, P. W., & Lemberger, J. (1999). Status and Subscribing: A Response to Schwitzgebel. Science & Education, 8, 507-523 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008694805475
  30. Hewson, P. W., Tabachnick, B. R., Zeichner, K. M., Blomker, K. B., Meyer, H., Lemberger, J., Marion, R., Park, H., & Toolin, R. (1999), Educating prospective teachers of Biology: introduction and research methods. Science Education, 83(3), 247-273 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199905)83:3<247::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-C
  31. Justi, R., & Gillbert, J. (2000). History and Philosophy of science through model. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993-1009 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416875
  32. Lawson, A. E. (1986). Integrating Research on Misconceptions, Reasoning Patterns and Three Types of Learning Cycle, Paper presented at the United State-Japan Seminar on Science Education, East-West Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, September, 15
  33. McCaskey, T. L., Dancy, M. H., & Elby, A. (2003). Effects on assessment caused by splits between belief and understanding. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, Madison, WI
  34. Novak, J. D. (1987). Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, (Ed.), NY: Cornell University, Department of Education
  35. Osborne, R. J., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implication of children's science. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann
  36. Park, H. (1995). A study of the components or students' conceptual ecologies. Unpublished doctoralthesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  37. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
  38. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1988). Bibliography Student' alternative frameworks and Science education, 2nd Edition, IPN, Institution for Science Education
  39. Sadanand, N., & Kess, J. (1990). Concepts in force and motion. The Physics Teacher, 28, 530-533 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343138
  40. Shepardson, D. P. & Moje, E. B. (1999). 'The role of anomalous data in restructuring forth graders' framework for understanding electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77-94 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290840
  41. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Science, 3(2), 115-163
  42. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In West, L. H. & Pines, A L. (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. London, cademic Press, 211-231
  43. Taber, K. S. (2003). Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner's prior learning. Science Education, 87(5), 732-758 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10079
  44. Tasker, R., & Osborne, R. (1985). Science teaching and science learning, in Learning in Science, The implications of childrens' science, Osborne, R., Freybery, P., Heinemann, Auckland, London Portsmouth N. H., 15-27
  45. Thijs, G. D. (1992). Evaluation of an introductory course on : force' considering students' preconception. Science Education, 76, 155-174 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760205
  46. Thorley, N. R. (1990). The role of the conceptual change model in the interpretation classroom interactions. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Wisconsin-madison
  47. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding. Vol. 1: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Princeton: University of Princeton Press
  48. Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K., & Christopher, J. E. (2007). A longitudinal study of conceptual change: preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 303-326 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20121
  49. Watts, D. M., & Zylbersztajn, A. (1981), A Survey of Some Children's Ideas about Force. Physics Education, 15, 360-365
  50. West, L. H. T. & Pines, A. L. (1985). Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Orlando, FL: Academic press
  51. von Wright, G. H. (1971), Explanation and understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. press. (배철영역, 1994, 설명과 이해, 서광사)