A Feasibility Evaluation on the Outsourcing of Quality Testing and Inspection

  • Choi, Minsoo (CERIK(Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea)) ;
  • Kim, Moohan (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2007.01.09
  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the feasibility of outsourcing test/inspection activity in construction work. This research conducted a questionnaire of interested parties as well as a survey by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with experts on quality control. For the evaluation by AHP, five criteria were adopted and a number of pair-wise comparisons were conducted through two stages. Finally, the weighting coefficient to approve the outsourcing was calculated at 0.606 and it therefore appeared more reasonable to permit rather than prohibit outsourcing. According to the AHP result, it was found that outsourcing would be necessary to enhance the objectivity and specialties of quality testing and inspection, even though somewhat undesirable in terms of enhancing a sense of responsibility and systemically conducting the testing and inspection.

Keywords

References

  1. Barrie, D. S., and Paulson, B. C. 1992. Professional Construction Management : including CM. Design- Construct, and General Contracting. McGraw-Hill, Inc. pp.371-394
  2. Battikha, M. G. 2002. QUALICON, Computer-based system for construction quality management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, March/April. pp.164-173
  3. Choi, M. S. 2005. A study to improve a quality testing & inspection system in construction work - through benchmarking foreign construction projects, The Journal of Architectural Engineering, the Architecture Institute of Korea (AIK), 21(12) : 143-148
  4. Choi, M. S. 2004. A study to promote efficiency of QC activity by outsourcing quality testing and inspection, The Ministry of Construction and Transportation
  5. Davis, K., and Ledbetter, W. B. 1987. Measuring design and construction quality cost, Construction Industry Institution (CII), Austin, Tex
  6. General Services Administration. 2006. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
  7. Ishido, S. 1996. Construction quality management in Japan - Present and future. Proc., Annual Conference, The Korean Institute for Industrial Safety. pp.32-48.Doune Kun, 1995, Decision making method by the game theory. JUSE Press, Ltd. p.170
  8. Schexnayder, C. J., and Mayo, R. E. 2003. Construction management fundamentals. pp.491-496
  9. Voehl, F., and Jackson, P., and Ashton, D. 1994. ISO 9000 - an implementation guide for small to mid-sized business. St. Lucie Press, Inc. pp.99-111
  10. Williams, J. D. 1996. Application of TQM system in the construction industry, Construction Management(Part 2: Cases). Construction and Economy Research Institute of Korea (CERIK). pp.89-111