Korean journal of applied entomology (한국응용곤충학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Entomology (한국응용곤충학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Observation Methods for Density of Stink Bugs in Soybean Field

콩포장에서 노린재류의 밀도조사법 개발

  • 배순도 (작물과학원 영남농업연구소 식물환경과) ;
  • 김현주 (작물과학원 영남농업연구소 식물환경과) ;
  • 이건휘 (작물과학원 영남농업연구소 식물환경과) ;
  • 박성태 (작물과학원 영남농업연구소 식물환경과)
  • Published : 2007.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to develope the observing methods for density of stink bugs in soybean reproductive stage. The adults and nymphs of bean bug, Riptortus clavatus, red-banded shield bug, Piezodous hybneri, green stink bug, Nezara antennata, Sole bug, Dolycoris baccarum, and brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys were observed by three observing methods such as beating, sweeping net, and visual counting methods in the full bloom (R2), full pod (R4) and beginning maturity (R7) of soybean. As a result, total number of stink bugs observed was the highest with 5,214.2 by beating method, and then was 2,581.8 by visual counting method, and was the lowest with 103.1 by sweeping net method. Total number of stink bugs observed by the beating and visual counting methods was P. hybneri, followed by N. antennata, H. halys, R. clavatus and D. baccarum with clear difference in observed number of each stink bugs while total number of stink bugs observed by sweeping net method was very low in the range of 18 to 23. Accordingly, the observed density of stink bugs exception of R. clavatus adult by beating method was generally high. However, the number of R. clavatus adult was more observed by flushing method than that by beating method from the beginning bloom (R1) to full maturity (R8), and was more observed at morning time than that at afternoon time. Therefore, two observation methods that flushing method for R. clavatus and beating method for the other stink bugs were recommended for the occurring density of stink bugs in soybean because both bean bug and pentatomidae stink bugs have distinct behavior characteristics such as flying and dropping.

콩의 생식생장기에 노린재류의 밀도조사법을 개발하고자 하였다. 타락법, 포충망법 및 달관법으로 콩의 개화기(R2), 결협기(R4) 및 성숙기(R7)에 발생하는 톱다리개미허리노린재, 가로줄노린재, 풀색노린재, 알락수염노린재 및 썩덩나무노린재의 성충과 약충의 밀도를 조사한 결과 노린재류의 총 조사량은 타락법에서 5,214.2마리로 가장 많았으며, 다음은 달관법에서 2,581.8마리 였으며, 포충망법에서 103.1마리로 가장 적었다. 타락법과 달관법에 의한 노린재류의 총 조사량은 가로줄노린재 > 풀색노린재 > 썩덩나무노린재 > 톱다리개미허리노린재 > 알락수염노린재의 순서로 많았고, 발생량의 차이도 분명하였으나, 포충망법에 의한 노린재류의 총 조사량은 18-23마리로 발생량의 차이가 분명하지 않았다. 따라서 타락법에 의한 주요 노린재류의 조사밀도는 톱다리개미허리노린재 성충을 제외하곤 대체로 높았다. 하지만 타락법보다 불출법으로 콩의 개화시부터 성숙까지 톱다리개미허리노린재의 성충을 더 많이 조사할 수 있었고, 일중 조사량은 오후시간대보다 오전시간대에 많았다. 그러므로 콩포장에서 노린재류의 밀도조사법으로 톱다리개미허리노린재는 불출법으로, 가로줄노린재, 풀색노린재, 알락수염노린재 및 썩덩나무노린재는 타락법이 추천되었다. 이러한 2가지 조사법의 적용은 노린재류의 종간 행동적 특성 차이 때문이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, S.D., H.J. Kim, C.G. Park, J.K. Jung and H.J. Cho. 2004. Effects of food combinations of leguminous seeds on nymphal development, adult longevity and oviposition of bean bug, Riptortus clavatus Thunberg. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 43: 123-127
  2. Byerly, K.F., A.P. Gutierrez, R.E. Jones and R.F. Luck. 1978. A comparison of sampling methods for some arthropod populations in cotton. Higardia 46: 257-282
  3. Chung, B.K., S.W. Kang and J.H. Kwon. 1995. Damage, occurrences and control of hemipterous insects in non-astringent persimmon orchards. RDA. J. Agri. Sci. 37: 376-382
  4. Ellington, J., J.K. Kiser, G. Ferguson and M. Cardenas. 1984. A comparison of sweepnet, absolute, and insectavac sampling methods in cotton ecosystems. J. Econo. Entomol. 77: 599-605 https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/77.3.599
  5. Fleischer, S.J. and W.A. Allen. 1982. Field counting efficiency of sweep-net samples of adult potato leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in alfalfa. J. Econo. Entornol. 75: 837-840 https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/75.5.837
  6. Fleischer, S.J., M.J. Gaylor and J.V. Edelson. 1985. Estimating absolute density from relative sampling of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) from selected predators in early to midseason cotton. Environ. Entomol. 14: 709-717 https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/14.6.709
  7. Ha, KS., N.K. Heo, J.R. Kim, S.Y. Kim and S.H. Song. 1998. Effect of different seeding times and soybean varieties on damage and occurrence of hemiptera insect. RDA. J. Crop Protec. 40: 32-36
  8. Higuchi, H. 2001. Occurrence and control of stink bugs attacking soybeans. Pl. Quarant. 55: 220-223
  9. Hollingsworth, R.G., A.H. Hara and K.T. Sewake. 2001. Scouting for thrips in orchid flowers. Insect Pests. IP-8: 1-4
  10. Huh, H.S., K.H. Park, W.D. Seo and C.G. Park. 2005. Interaction of aggregation pheromone components of the bean bug, Riptortus clavatus (Thunberg) (Heteroptera: Alydidae). Appl. Entomol. zool. 40: 643-648 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2005.643
  11. Kang, C.H., H.S. Huh and C.G. Park. 2003. Review on true bugs infesting tree fruits, upland crops, and weeds in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 42: 269-277
  12. Larson, D.P., K.M. O'Neill and W.P. Kemp. 1999. Evaluation of the accuracy of sweep sampling in determining grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) community composition. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 16: 207-214
  13. Leal, W.S., H. Higuchi, N. Mizutani, H. Nakamori, T. kadosawa and M. Ono. 1995. Multifunctional communication in Riptortus clavatus (Heteroptera: Alydidae): conspecific egg parasitoid nymphs Ooencyrtus nezarae use the same adult attractant pheromone as chemical cue. J. Chem. Ecol. 21: 973-985 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033802
  14. Pedigo, L.P., G.D. Butin and E.J. Bechinski. 1982. Flushing technique and sequential-count plan for green cloverworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moths in soybeans. Environ. Entomol. 11: 1223- J228 https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/11.6.1223
  15. Race, S.R. 1960. A comparison of two sampling techniques for Lygus bugs and stink bugs on cotton. J. Econo. Entomol. 53: 689-690 https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/53.4.689
  16. RDA. 1999. Criteria of the monitoring of agricultural insect pests. Rur. Devel. Admin. 295pp
  17. Sevacherian, V. and V.M. Stern. 1972. Spatial distribution patterns of Lygus bugs in California cotton fields. Environ. Entomol. 1:695-704 https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/1.6.695
  18. Thorbek, P., C.J. Topping and K.D. Sunderland. 2002. Validation of a sample method for monitoring aerial activity of spiders. Arachnol. 30: 57-64 https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0057:VOASMF]2.0.CO;2
  19. Yasunaga, T., M. Takai, l. Yamashida, M. Kawamura and T. Kawasawa. 1995. A field guide to Japanese bugs. Ass. Nat. Rur. Edu. 380pp
  20. Wada, T. and M. Kobayashi. 1985. Distribution pattern and sampling techniques of the rice leaf roller, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, in a paddy field. Jpn. J. Appl. Ent. Zool. 29: 230-235 https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.29.230
  21. Wada, T. and H. Shimajin. 1978. Seasonal occurrence of rice leaf roller, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, in Chikugo. Research Report of Insect Pests of Kyushu Agr. Expt. Sta. 24: 77-79
  22. Witzgall, P. 2001. Pheromone-future techniques for insect control? Pheromone for Insect Cont. Orchard and Vineyards. lOBC wprs Bull. 24: 114-122
  23. Zink, A.G. and J.A. Rosenheim. 2004. State-dependent sampling bias in insects: implications for monitoring western tarnished plant bugs. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 113: 117-123 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00213.x

Cited by

  1. Preference evaluation of stink bugs to leguminous seeds by video tracking system vol.39, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7744/cnujas.2012.39.4.483
  2. Review of the Biology, Ecology, and Management ofHalyomorpha halys(Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea vol.42, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1603/EN13006
  3. Evaluation of Insecticidal Activity of Pesticides Against Hemipteran Pests on Apple Orchard vol.19, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2015.19.3.264
  4. Antibiotic and Insecticidal Activities of Metabolites Derived From an Entomopathogenic Bacterium, Xenorhabdus nematophila, Against The Bean Bug, Riptortus clavatus vol.49, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.3.251
  5. Occurrence and Control Method of Riptortus pedestris (Hemiptera: Alydidae): Korean Perspectives vol.52, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2013.08.0.038
  6. Seasonal occurrence pattern and within-plant egg distribution of bean bug, Riptortus pedestris (Fabricius) (Hemiptera: Alydidae), and its egg parasitoids in soybean fields vol.45, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2010.457
  7. Attractiveness of Stink Bugs to Color, Height and Location of Aggregation Pheromone Trap vol.49, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.4.325
  8. Synthesis of nanoporous materials to dispense pheromone for trapping agricultural pests vol.23, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-015-0109-4
  9. Seeding Dates and Cultivars Effects on Stink Bugs Population and Damage on Common Bean Phaseolus vulgaris L vol.46, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-017-0512-4