Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Current Status of the Electronic Journal Usage Statistics at the Academic Libraries

대학도서관에서의 전자저널 이용 통계 제공 및 활용 현황

  • Hwang, Ok-Gyung (Library and Information Science Dept., Seoul Women's University)
  • 황옥경 (서울여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to understand the present state of practical use of electronic journal usage statistics at the academic libraries. For this purpose the study performed an online questionnaire survey to the 63 academic libraries located in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province. Based on the 48 responses, the study found out that the rate of satisfaction with the present usage data was low. Especially the rate of unsatisfaction with the absence of comparable data and the average usage rate of all the subscribing libraries appeared high. The study also examined 5 types of statistics for the evaluation of electronic journal.

본 연구의 목적은 국내 대학도서관에서의 전자저널 이용 통계 제공 및 활용 현황을 조사하는 데 있다. 이를 위하여 서울 및 경기 소재 63개 대학교 및 대학도서관을 대상으로 온라인 설문지조사를 시행하였고 이 중 48개 도서관으로부터 응답지를 회수하여 그 결과를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 현재 제공되고 있는 이용 통계 데이터에 대한 만족도는 낮게 나타났으며 특히 비교 가능한 데이터의 부재 문제와 구독 대학도서관 전체의 평균 이용률에 대한 정보가 제공되지 않는 데 따른 불만이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 더불어 선행연구 조사 및 현행 이용 데이터에 대한 분석을 통해 전자저널 평가에 활용할 수 있는 이용 데이터 통계치로서 5가지 유형을 고찰하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 손정표, 심상순. 2001. 전자저널의 이용평가에 관한 연구: Y대 도서관의 IDEAL을 중심으로. 한국도서관.정보학회지, 32(4):419-447.
  2. 심원식. 2005. 전자정보 이용 통계 활용 전략. 정보관리학회지, 22(2): 5-21.
  3. 이하범. 2003. 전자저널 선정을 위한 평가방법 연구. 한국비블리아, 14(1): 79-90.
  4. Bonthron, Karen, Christine Urquhart, Rhian Thomas, Chris Armstrong, David Ellis, Jean Everitt, Roger Fenton, Ray Lonsdale, Elizabeth McDermott, Helen Morris, Rebecca Phillips, Sian Spink, and Alison Yeoman. 2003. "Trends in Use of Electronic Journals in Higher Education in the UK—Views of Academic Staff and Students." D-Lib Magazine, 9(6). [cited 2007. 3. 20]. .
  5. COUNTER. 2005. The COUNTER Code of Practice - Journal and Database: Relaease 2. [cited 2007. 4. 3]. .
  6. Davis, M. Philip. 2002. "Patterns in Electronic Journal Usage: Challenging the Composition of Geographic Consortia." College & Research Libraries, 63(6):484-497. [cited 2007. 4. 3]. . https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.63.6.484
  7. Eason, K., Richardson, S., & Yu, L. 2000. "Patterns of use of electronic journals." Journal of Documentation, 56(5):477-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007124
  8. Finholt, Thomas A. & JoAnn M. Brooks. 1999. "Analysis of JSTOR: The Impact on Scholarly Practice of Access to On-Line Journal Archives." Technology and Scholarly Communication, edited by R. Ekman and E. Quandt. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 177-194.
  9. Quoted in Nicholas, David, Paul Huntington, Hamid Jamali, Carol Tenopir. 2006. "Finding Differences in Use According to Method of Access." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2): 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.005
  10. Hahn, Karla L. and Faulkner, Lila A. 2002. "Evaluative Usage-based Metrics for the selection of E-journals." College & Research Libraries, 63(3): 215-227. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.63.3.215
  11. ICOLC. 2006. Revised guidelines for statistical measures of usage of web-based indexed, abstracted, and full text resources. [cited 2007. 3. 29]. .
  12. Institute for the future. 2002. E-Journal User: Report of Web Log Data Mining. [cited 2007. 3. 29]. .
  13. Ke, H.-R., Kwakkelaar, R., Tai, Y.-M., & Chen, L.-C. 2002. "Exploring behavior of e-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier's ScienceDirect OnSite in Taiwan." Library & Information Science Research, 24(3): 265-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(02)00126-3
  14. Luther, Judy. 2001. "White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics." Council on Library and Information Resources. [cited 2007. 3. 29]. .
  15. Nicholas, David, Paul Huntington, Hamid Jamali, Carol Tenopir. 2006. "Finding Differences in Use According to Method of Access." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2): 119-126. [cited 2007. 4. 10]. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.005
  16. Pullinger, David & Christine Baldwin. 2002. Electronic Journals and User Behaviour: Learning for The Future from The SuperJournal Project. Cambridge: Deedot press. Quoted in Nicholas, David, Paul Huntington, Hamid Jamali, Carol Tenopir. 2006. "Finding Differences in Use According to Method of Access." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2): 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.12.005
  17. Sanville, T. J. 2000. A Method out of the Madness: OhioLINK's Collaborative Response to the serials crisis, Three Years Later-Progress Report. North American Serials Interest Group Conference. San Diego: University of California.
  18. Sanville, T. J. 2001. "A method out of the madness: OhioLink's collaborative response to the serial crisis: four years later progress report." Serials, 14(2):163-177. https://doi.org/10.1629/14163
  19. Tenopir, Carol, Donald W. King, Peter Boyce, Matt Grayson, Yan Zhang, and Mercy Ebuen. 2003. "Patterns of Journal Use by Scientists through Three Evolutionary Phases." D-Lib Magazine, 9(5). [cited 2007. 4. 10]. .