Economic and Environmental Geology (자원환경지질)

The Korean Society of Economic and Environmental Geology (대한자원환경지질학회)
권호 표지

Application and Comparison of GeoWEPP model and USLE model to Natural Small Catchment - A Case Study in Danwol-dong, Icheon-si

소유역에서의 토사유출 산정을 위한 GeoWEPP model과 USLE의 비교.적용 연구 - 이천시 단월동 유역을 사례로

  • Kim, Min-Seok (Department of Geological and Environmental Hazards, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Kwan (Department of Geological and Environmental Hazards, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) ;
  • Yang, Dong-Yoon (Department of Geological and Environmental Hazards, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources)
  • 김민석 (한국지질자원연구원, 지질환경재해연구부) ;
  • 김진관 (한국지질자원연구원, 지질환경재해연구부) ;
  • 양동윤 (한국지질자원연구원, 지질환경재해연구부)
  • Published : 2007.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The empirical USLE and the physically-based GeoWEPP which were distributed model linked with GIS (Geographical Information System) were applied to small natural catchment located in Icheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. The results using by two models were total sediment yield from study catchment between January, 2004 and January, 2005. During the study period, the observed total sediment yield was 270.54 ton and the total sediment yield computed by USLE and GeoWEPP model were 358.1 ton and 283.30 ton, respectively. Each of results computed by USLE and GeoWEPP overestimated more than the observed total sediment yield, but, based on the results, the total sediment yield computed by GeoWEPP approximated to the observed result. We suggest that the reason why the total sediment yield using by models overestimated was that computed amounts by two models did not contain the amount of suspended sediment flowed over the weir.

GIS와 연계시켜 만든 분산형 모델의 대표적인 경험식인 USLE model과 물리학기반의 GeoWEPP model을 경기도 이천시에 위치한 소유역에 적용하여 2004년 1월에서 2005년 1월까지 1년간의 토사유출량을 비교하였다. 연구기간동안의 유출된 토사량은 실제관측결과 270.54 ton, USLE 모델 적용 시 358.1 ton, 그리고 GeoWEPP 모델 적용 시 283.30 ton으로 각각 산출되었다. 각각의 모델을 적용한 산출량은 실제 산출량보다 과대하게 산출되었으며, 산출결과만을 볼 때, GeoWEPP 모델을 적용한 토사유출량이 USLE 적용 산출량 보다 관측량에 더 근사한 산출량을 보였다. 모델 적용 산출량이 과대산출 된 원인으로는 실험웨어를 월류하여 빠져나간 부유물에 대한 양이 포함되지 않았기 때문으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Beasly, D. B., Huggins, L. E. and Menke, E. J. (1980) ANSWERS: A Moseld for Watershed Planning, Trans. ASAE, 23, p. 938-944 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34692
  2. Brown, L.C. and Brownwell, T.O. (1987) The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS, US Environmental Protection Agency EPA, 600(3)
  3. Burgoa, B. and Wauchope, R.D. (1995) Pesticides in runoff and surface waters, In: Roberts, T., Kearny, P.C. (Eds.), Environmental Behavior of Agrochemicals, 9, Wiley, New York, p. 221-255
  4. Evans, K.G., Loch, R.J., Aspinall, T.O. and Bell, L.C. (1992) Spoil pile erosion prediction-How far have we advanced?, In: Third Large Open Pit Mining Conference, Mackay, Queensland, p. 201-205
  5. Flanagan, D.C., Nearing, M.A. (1995) USDA-Water Erosion Prediction project: Hillslope profile and watershed model documentation, NSERL Report No. 10, USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, IN 47097-1196
  6. Garbrecht, J. and Martz, L.W. (1997) Automated channel ordering and node indexing for raster channel networks, Coputers & Geosciences, 23(9), p. 961-966 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00055-1
  7. Hanley, N., Faichney, R., Munro, A. and Shortle, J.S. (1998) Economic and environmental modelling for pollution control in an estuary, Journal of Environmental Management, 52, p. 211-225 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0175
  8. IPCC, 2001, Climate Change 2001- Third Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 255p
  9. KIGAM (1974) LEECHEON geologic map of Korea
  10. KIGAM (1975) YeJU geologic map of Korea
  11. KIGAM (2005) Mitigation Technology of Geohazard of Erosion and Sedimentation, Ministry of Science & Technology
  12. Kim, J.K., Yang, D.Y. and Kim. J.Y (2004a) The Variety of Soil Erodibility (K-factor) by Erosion-plot Experiment during Rainfall, Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association, 11(3), p. 37-46
  13. Kim, J.K., Yang, D.Y., Kim. J.Y. and PARK, J.K (2004b) Suspended Sediment Yields related to Discharge-Turbidity in Small Mountainous Catchment, Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association, 11(3), p. 25-36
  14. Kinnell, P. and Risse, L. (1998) USLE-M: Empirical modelling rainfall erosion through runoff and sediment concentration, Soil Science, 62(6), p. 1667-1672 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200060026x
  15. Lee, E.G. and Lee, H.Y. (1998) Spatial distribution and causative factors of typhoon disasters in Korea, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 33(2), p. 179-190
  16. Loch, R. and Rosewell, C. (1992) Laboratory methods for measurement of soil erodibilities (K factors) for the universal soil loss equation, Australian Journal of Soil Research, 30, p. 233-248 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9920233
  17. Merritt W.S., Letcher R.A. and Jakeman A.J. (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models, Environmental Modeling & Software, 18, p. 761-799 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1
  18. NCHRP (1980) Design of Sedimentation Basin, Synthesis of Highway Practice #70, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C
  19. Nearing, M.A., Page, D.I., Simanton, J.R. and Lane, L.J. (1989), Determining erodibility parameters from rangeland field data for a process-based erosion model, Trans. ASAE, 32(3), p. 919-924 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31091
  20. Park, J. K. (1994) The Estimation of Suspended Sediment Yield by the SRC Method in a Small Mountainous, Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association, 1(1), p. 17-32
  21. Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Wessies, G. A., McCool, D. K. and Yoder, D. C. (1993) Predicting Soil Erosion by Water-A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, RUSLE, Agriculture Handbook No.703, USDA
  22. Renard, K.G., Laflen, J.M., Foster, G.R. and McCool, D.K. (1994) The revised universal soil loss equation, In: Lad, R (Ed.), Soil Erosion: Research Methods, p. 105-126
  23. Renschler, C.S. (2003) Designing geo-spatial interfaces to scale process models: The GeoWEPP approach. Hydrological Processes, 17, p. 1005-1017 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1177
  24. Risse, L.M., Nearing, M.A., Savabi, M.R. (1994) Determining the Green - Ampt effective hydraulic conductivity from rainfall-runoff data for the WEPP model, Trans. ASAE, 37, p. 411-418 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28092
  25. Rose, C.W. (1993) Erosion and sedimentation. In: Bonell, M., Hufschmidt, M.M., Gladwell, J.S. (Eds.), Hydrology and Water Management in the Humid Tropics: Hydrological Research Issues and Strategies for Water Management. Cambridge University Press, p. 301-343
  26. Shin, Y.K., Kim, J.W. (2004) The Effect of Land Uses on Pollutant Loads in Daegwallyong Area - An Application of USLE-series Models and CN Method, Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association, 11(1), p. 91-104
  27. Shin. W.H. (2004) Application of WEPP Model for Estimation of Sediment Yield. Master's Thesis, Seoul National University
  28. USDA (1996) Predicting soil erosion by water: A Guide to conservation planning with the RUSLE, Agriculture Handbook #703
  29. Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D. (1978) Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses - A Guide to Conservation Planning, USDA Agriculture Handbook 537
  30. Zhang, X.C., Nearing, M.A., Risse, L.M. and McGregor, K.C. (1996) Evaluation of WEPP runoff and soil loss predictions using natural runoff plot data, Trans. ASAE, 39, p. 855-863 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.27570