The Relationship between Offline Trust and Online Transaction in Internet Banking

인터넷 뱅킹에서 오프라인 신뢰와 온라인 거래의 관계

  • Published : 2007.06.30

Abstract

Owing to the rapid growth of using the Internet, not only click-and-mortar companies but also brick-and-mortar ones have been expanding their distribution channels into online, Moreover, since online channels are more attractive than offline ones in control and maintenance, switching customers into online ones is emerged as one of very important managerial issues in a view of reduction of cost as well as expansion of services. However, the switched customers should be faced by uncertainties which could not have been experienced in offline. Specifically, in online channels, buyers and sellers are separated temporally and spacially and there are always so many kinds of threat for security as well as not enough systems and conventions for them yet. Therefore, trust has been considered as one of the most critical mechanisms for resolution of such uncertainties in online transactions. However, it is not easy to build and maintain the relationships in online since most of them are virtual and indirect generally. Therefore, in order to switch offline customers into online ones, it is very important to make strategies based on identification of the relationship between online transaction and offline trust which has been built in offline business. Generally offline trust, which has been built independent of online, could not include trust for online-dependent activities such as payment security during or after transactions, while most of online trust include it. Therefore, a customer with high offline trust does not always perceive high security and assure safe transactions. Accordingly, while online trust, where technical capabilities for online security is one of main bases, includes control trust implicitly or explicitly, offline trust does not. However. in spite of such clear discrimination and independence between offline trust and perceived security, there can be the significant dependency between these two beliefs. The customers with high offline trust believe that the company would do some activities for online security for customers' safe transactions since it has been believed of doing well for customers' trust. Theoretically, users' perception of security is interpreted as a kind of control trus, which is trust for company's technical control capacities in order to resolve technical uncertainties in online. Therefore, the relationship between two beliefs can be considered as transference from offline trust to another type trust. that is, control trust. The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of offline trust on online transaction uses mediated by perceived security. For this purpose, we suggest a research model based on technology acceptance model (TAM). Reuse intention is adopted as a dependent variable and TAM is modified by adding perceived risk (PR) as well as two beliefs of using Internet banking, perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU). Moreover, perceive security (PS) is adopted as an external variable for PR and PU, while offline trust (OT) is an antecedent of PS. For an empirical test, sampling from 108 visitors to the banks in Daegu, Korea, we analyze our model by partial least square (PLS) approach. In result, our model is shown to explain 51.4% of the variance in reuse intention and all hypothesis are supported statistically. A theoretical implication of this study is to identify a role of PS between offline trust and reuse intention of using online transaction services. According to our result, PS can be considered as a mediation variable for bridging between two different concepts: trust that explains social aspects of customers and companies, and TAM that explains customers' reuse intention.

Keywords

References

  1. 윤원창, "[ET칼럼] 편리한 세상의 조건,"전자일보, 2005
  2. 이규태, "[e리서치]인터넷 뱅킹 이용현황 조사," 전자일보, 2005
  3. 이웅규, "보안과 위험의 지각이 인터넷 뱅킹 재사용 의도에 미치는 영향," 경영정보학연구, 제17권, 제1호, 2007, pp. 77-93
  4. Bhattacherjee, A., "Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2002, pp. 211-241
  5. Chang, M.K., Cheung, W. and Lai, V.S. "Literature Derived Reference Models for Adoption of Online Shopping," Information and Management, Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2005, pp. 543-559 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(04)00051-5
  6. Chen, L., Gillenson, M.L. and Sherrell, D.L. "Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective," Information &Management, Vol. 39, Issue 8, 2002, pp. 705-719 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00127-6
  7. Chin, W.W., "Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1998a, pp. vii-xvi
  8. Chin, W.W., "Overview of the PLS Method," http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/PLSINTRO. HTM, 1998b
  9. Chircu, A.M., Davis, G.B. and Kauffman, R.J., "Trust, Expert, and e-commerce Intermediary Adoption," Proceedings of the 6th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2000, pp. 710-716
  10. Corbitt, B.J., Thanasankit, T. and Yi, H., "Trust and e-Commerce: a Study of Consumer Perceptions," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 203- 215 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00024-3
  11. Davis, F.D, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1989, pp. 319-340 https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R., "User Acceptacne of Computer Technolgoy: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8. 1989, pp. 982-1003 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  13. Doney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P., "An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61, No. 1, 1997, pp. 35-51 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251829
  14. Falk, R.F. and Miller, N.B., A Primer for Soft Modeling, University of Akron Press, Akron, Ohio, 1992
  15. Gefen, D. and Straub, W., "Consumer Trust in B2C e-commerce and the Importance of Social Presence: Experiment in e-products and e-services," Omega, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2004, pp. 407-424 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006
  16. Gefen, D., "E-commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust," Omega, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2000, pp. 725-737 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9
  17. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W., "Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2003a, pp. 51-90
  18. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W., "Inexperience and Experience with Online Stores: the Importance of TAM and Trust," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2003b, pp. 307-321 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.817277
  19. Hair, J.F., Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C., Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Fifth edition, 1998
  20. Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P. and Peralta, M., "Building Consumer Trust Online," Communication of ACM, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1999, pp. 80-85
  21. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N. and Vitale, M., "Consumer Trust in an Internet Store," Information Technology and Management, Vol. 1, No. 12, 2000, pp. 45-71 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019104520776
  22. Karjaluoto, H., Mattila, M. and Pento, T., "Factors Underlying Attitude Formation towards Online Banking in Finland," International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2002, pp. 261-272 https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320210446724
  23. Keen, P.G.W., "Are You Ready for 'Trust' Economy," Computer World, Vol. 31, No. 16, 1997, p. 80
  24. Kim, K.K. and Probakar, B., "Initial Trust and the Adoption of B2C e-Commerce: the Case of Internet Banking," DATABASE, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2004
  25. Lai, V.S. and Li, H., "Technology Acceptance Model for Internet Banking: an Invariance Analysis," Information and Management, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2005, pp. 373-386 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.007
  26. Lee, M.K.O. and Turban, E., "A Trust Model for Consumer Internet Shopping," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, 2001, pp. 75-91 https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044227
  27. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P., "Why do People Use Information Technology? a Critical Review of the Technology Acceptance Model," Information and Management, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2003, pp. 191-204
  28. Luhmann, N., Trust and Power, England, John Willey & Sons, 1979
  29. Luthan, F., Organizational Behavior, McGraw- ill/Irwin, 10th edition, 2004
  30. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D., "An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1995, pp. 709-734 https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
  31. McKnight, D.H. and Chervany, N.L., "What Trust Means in e-commerce Customer Relationships: an Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology," International Journal Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2002, pp. 35-53
  32. McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C., "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-commerce: an Integrative Topology," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 334-359 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81
  33. Pavlou, P.A., "Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2003, pp. 101-134
  34. Pavlou, P.A. and Gefen, D., "Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution- based Trust," Information Systems Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2004, pp. 37-59 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0015
  35. Quelch, J.A. and Klein, L.R., "The Internet and International Marketing," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1996, pp. 60-75
  36. Ratnasingham, P. and Kumar, K., "Trading Partner Trust in Electronic Commerce Participation," Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Systems, 2001, pp. 544-552
  37. Reichheld, F.F. and Schefter, P., "E-Loyalty: Your Secret Weapon on the Web," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2000, pp. 105-113
  38. Rousseu, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S. and Camerser, C., "Not so Different after all: a Cross-Discipline View of Trust," Academy of Management Review. Vol. 23, No. 3, 1998, pp. 383-404
  39. Salam, A.F., Lyer, L., Palvia, P. and Singh, R., "Trust in e-Commerce," Communication of ACM, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2005, pp. 73-77
  40. Shankar, V.G., Urban, L. and Sultan, F., "Online Trust: a Stakeholder Perspective, Concepts, Implications, and Future Directions," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, 2002, pp. 325-344 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00022-7
  41. Steward, K.J., "Transference as a Means of Building Trust in World Wide Web Sites," Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Information Systems, 1999, pp. 459-464
  42. Steward, K.J., "Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web," Organization Science, Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 459-464
  43. Suh, B. and Han, I., "Effect of Trust on Customer Acceptance of Internet Banking," Electronic Commerce Research and Application, Vol. 1, No. 3-4, 2002, pp. 247-263 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00017-0
  44. Tan, Y-H., and Thoen, W., "Toward a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce," International Journal Electronic Commerce, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2001, pp. 61-74
  45. Wold, H., "Introduction to the Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis," in H. Wold (Ed.), Theoretical Empiricism, New York: Paragon House, 1989, pp. vii-xl
  46. Wold, H., "Soft Modeling: the Basic Design and Some Extensions," in System Under Indirect Observations: Part 2, K.G. Joreskog and H. Wold (edition), Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1982, pp. 1-54
  47. Yoon, S., "The Antecedents and Consequences of Trust in Online-Purchase Decisions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2002, pp. 47-63