MEASUREMENT OF MAXILLARY SINUS VOLUME FOR THE PLACEMENT OF GRAFT MATERIAL - A CASE CONTROL STUDY USING CT IMAGE

상악동 골이식술을 위한 이식재의 부피 측정 - CT를 이용한 환자 대조군 연구

  • Kim, Hyung-Wook (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Lee, Seul-Ki (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Chung, Jae-An (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Shin, Jin-Eob (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Um, Yun-Sub (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Young (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Sik (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Song, Yun-Jung (Department of Operative Dentistry, Hallym University Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Hong, Soon-Min (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Park, Jun-Woo (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University)
  • 김형욱 (한림대학교 강동성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 이슬기 (한림대학교 성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 정재안 (한림대학교 강남성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 신진업 (한림대학교 강남성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 엄윤섭 (한림대학교 강동성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김기영 (한림대학교 강동성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김종식 (한림대학교 강동성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 송윤정 (한림대학교 임상치의학대학원 치과병원 치과보존과) ;
  • 홍순민 (한림대학교 강동성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 박준우 (한림대학교 강동성심병원 구강악안면외과)
  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to determine whether a difference in the amount of bone graft material is needed between edentulous patients and dentulous patients and to calculate the amount of augmentation for a sinus lift procedure. Methods: 19 patients(20 sinuses) were included to measure maxillary sinus volume. Facial CT scanning was performed using MX 8000 IDT CT devices(Philips, USA). And it was used for IDLvm(The IDL Virtual Machine) 6.0, CT Volume Analyzer Ver 2.3 program to measure maxillary sinus volumes Results: At edentulous patients, volumes(mean${\pm}SD$) of the inferior portion of the sinuses were $0.56{\pm}0.13cm^3$(5mm height), $2.35{\pm}0.57cm^3$(10mm height), $4.85{\pm}1.10cm^3$(15mm height). At dentulous patients, volumes(mean${\pm}SD$) of the inferior portion of the sinuses were $0.41{\pm}0.18cm^3$(5mm height), $1.76{\pm}0.42cm^3$(10mm height), $3.80{\pm}0.84cm^3$ (15mm height). A significant correlation was found between augmentation height(5mm, 10mm, 15mm) and the calculated sinus volume.(p=0.027, p=0.018, p=0.044) Conclusions: A significant correlation was found between augmentation height(5mm, 10mm, 15mm) and the calculated sinus volume. Detailed preoperative knowledge of sinus lift augmentation volume is helpful in determining the appropriate amount of the bone graft material.

Keywords

References

  1. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Soejima Y: Measurement of maxillary sinus volume using computerized tomographic images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(6):811-8
  2. Chanavaz M: Sinus grafting related to implantology. Statistical analysis of 15 years of surgical experience (1979-1994). J Oral Implantol 1996;22(2):119-30
  3. Tatum H, Jr: Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30(2):207-29
  4. Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Timmenga NM, Vissink A, Reintsema H: Morbidity and complications of bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1999;3 Suppl 1:S65-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00014520
  5. Gray CF, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Needham G, Renny NM: Assessment of maxillary sinus volume for the sinus lift operation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29(3):154-8 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600518
  6. Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, Maier H, Weinlander M, Piehslinger E: Computerized tomography-assisted calculation of sinus augmentation volume. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(6):907-13
  7. Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, Akiyoshi T: A cadaveric study of maxillary sinus size as an aid in bone grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56(10):1158-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90761-3
  8. Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH: The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132(3):429-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.11.012
  9. Chanavaz M: Maxillary sinus: anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology--eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990). J Oral Implantol 1990;16(3):199-209
  10. Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S: Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23(3):163-8 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.23.3.7835518
  11. Tallgren A: The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27(2):120-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  12. Ulm CW, Solar P, Gsellmann B, Matejka M, Watzek G: The edentulous maxillary alveolar process in the region of the maxillary sinus--a study of physical dimension. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24(4):279-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(95)80029-8
  13. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ: Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45
  14. Fugazzotto PA: GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 2: Clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23(6):599-605
  15. Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L: Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6(3):165-73 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00224.x
  16. Wallace SS, Froum SJ: Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8(1):328-43 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328
  17. Garg AK: Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of dental implants: anatomy, physiology, and procedures. Implant Dent 1999;8(1):36-46 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199901000-00004
  18. Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne OR: A review of survivalrates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using metaanalysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(2):175-82
  19. Shlomi B, Horowitz I, Kahn A, Dobriyan A, Chaushu G: The effect of sinus membrane perforation and repair with Lambone on the outcome of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(4):559-62
  20. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K: A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15(3):339-45 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  21. Nystrom E, Legrell PE, Forssell A, Kahnberg KE: Combined use of bone grafts and implants in the severely resorbed maxilla. Postoperative evaluation by computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24(1 Pt 1):20-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80851-3
  22. GaRey DJ, Whittaker JM, James RA, Lozada JL: The histologic evaluation of the implant interface with heterograft and allograft materials--an eight-month autopsy report, Part II. J Oral Implantol 1991; 17(4):404-8
  23. Velich N, Nemeth Z, Toth C, Szabo G: Long-term results with different bone substitutes used for sinus floor elevation. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15(1):38-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200401000-00013
  24. Gordh M, Alberius P: Some basic factors essential to autogeneic nonvascularized onlay bone grafting to the craniofacial skeleton. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999;33(2):129-46 https://doi.org/10.1080/02844319950159370
  25. Pow EH, McMillan AS: A modified implant healing abutment to optimize soft tissue contours: a case report. Implant Dent 2004;13(4):297-300 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000144510.66524.87
  26. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(1):53-8
  27. Wanschitz F, Figl M, Wagner A, Rolf E: Measurement of volume changes after sinus floor augmentation with a phycogenic hydroxyapatite. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(3):433-8
  28. Hallman M, Hedin M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S: A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60(3):277-84; discussion 85-6 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.30576
  29. Xu H, Shimizu Y, Asai S, Ooya K: Grafting of deproteinized bone particles inhibits bone resorption after maxillary sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(1):126-33 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01003.x