INCIDENCE OF SINUS SEPTA AND ACCURACY OF PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH

상악동 중격의 발생율과 파노라마 방사선 사진의 정확도

  • Shin, Chang-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Jong-Rak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Seung-Min (Department of Periodontics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 신창훈 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김형진 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 홍종락 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 양승민 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치주과)
  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of antral septa and the accuracy of panoramic radiograph in identifying maxillary sinus septa. In addition, when panoramic radiograph led to a false diagnosis of more than majority, we analyzed findings of the panoramic radiograph. Patients and methods: This study included 180 patients who were radiographically examined before the surgery was done using both panoramic and computerized tomographic radiographs(CT scan), Samsung Medical Center from April 2003 to March 2006, and examined the incidence of antral septa, the false diagnosis rate of panoramic radiograph, and radiographic characters in case of false diagnosis. Only those bone lamellae were considered as septa that showed a height of at least 3.0mm. It was thus possible to exclude the alveolar recess. One oral and maxillofacial surgeon(OMFS) determined the presence or absence of sinus septa in CT scan, and five OMFS determined the presence or absence of sinus septa in panoramic radiograph. Results: The septa were observed in 81 of 360 sinuses(22.5%). All septa were oriented in a buccopalatal plane. More or less greater prevalence was observed in the second molar region(38.2%) but no predominant location was found. Panoramic radiograph led to false diagnosed septa in 361 of 1800 cases(20.1%). In case of false diagnosis of more than majority, superimposed image on zygomatic process was 44.1%, faint image in the region not related to sinus lifting 26.5%, faint image in the region related to sinus lifting 17.6%, and misconception for superimposed image 11.8% Conclusion: In this study we could get clinico-anatomical information of septum in the maxillary sinus. Compared to CT scan, panoramic radiograph can not clearly differentiate the sinus septa, but we consider that panoramic radiograph may improve its usefulness if we take additional modified panoramic radiograph and clinical exam.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyne PJ, James RA: Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616
  2. Underwood AS: An inquiry into the anatomy and pathology of the maxillary sinus. J Anat Physiol 1910;44:354-369
  3. Chanavaz M: Maxillary sinus: anatomy, physiology, surgery, and bone grafting related to implantology-eleven years of surgical experience (1979-1990). J Oral Implantol 1990;16:199-209
  4. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ: Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45
  5. Tidwell JK, Blijdorp PA, Stoelinga PJ, Brouns JB, Hinderks F: Composite grafting of the maxillary sinus for placement of endosteal implants. A preliminary report of 48 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;21:204-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80219-X
  6. Betts NJ, Miloro M: Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:332-333 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90313-1
  7. Ulm CW, Solar P, Krennmair G, Matejka M, Watzek G: Incidence and suggested surgical management of septa in sinus-lift procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:462-465
  8. Mafee MF, Chow JM, Meyers R: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: anatomy, CT screening, indications, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:735-744 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.4.8456654
  9. Krennmair G, Ulm C, Lugmayr H: Maxillary sinus septa: incidence, morphology and clinical implications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:261-265 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(97)80063-7
  10. 오희균, 유선열: 상악동 중격에 대한 임상해부학적 연구. 대한구강악안면외과학회지 1998;24:208-212
  11. Velasquez-Plata D, Hovey LR, Peach CC, Alder ME: Maxillary sinus septa: a 3-dimensional computerized tomographic scan analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:854-860
  12. Krennmair G, Ulm CW, Lugmayr H, Solar P: The incidence, location, and height of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:667-671; discussion 671-662 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90427-5
  13. Stover JD: Discussion: The incidence, location, and height of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;25:671-672
  14. Monsour PA, Mendoza AR: Visualization of the maxillary sinus and styloid processes using rotational panoramic radiography. Aust Dent J 1991;36:5-10 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1991.tb00800.x