Subsidence Ratio after Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Using an Intraoperative Custom-made Cervical Cage

  • Kim, Dok-Ryong (Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Byung-Gwan (Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hoon (Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Hee-In (Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Jin (Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Joo-Seung (Department of Neurosurgery, Eulji University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2007.05.30

Abstract

Objective : The postoperative subsidence of anterior cervical interbody fusion for cervical degenerative diseases gives rise to segmental kyphotic collapse, screw loosening, and chronic neck pain. So, intraoperative custom-made polymethylmethacrylate [PMMA] C-cage has been developed to prevent subsidence following anterior cervical fusion. Methods : A total of patients who underwent anterior cervical interbody fusion with a intraoperative custom - made cervical cage filled with local bone and demineralized bone matrix [group A] were analyzed prospectively from June 2004 to June 2005. These were compared with 40 patients who were treated with iliac bone graft [group B]. We evaluated subsidence ratio, change of segmental angle, distraction length and segmental angle. Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results : Group A had a statistically significant decrease in subsidence ratio [$0.64{\pm}0.43%$, p=0.00]. distraction length [$2.42{\pm}1.25\;mm$, p=0.02], and follow angle change [$1.78{\pm}1.69^{\circ}$, p=0.01] as compared with Group B. However, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative segmental angle change [p=0.66]. On the analysis of the correlation coefficient, the parameters showed no interrelationships in the group A. On the other hand, subsidence ratio was affected by distraction length in the group B [Pearson correlation=0.448]. Conclusion : This operative technique would be contributed for the reduction of a postoperative subsidence after the anterior cervical interbody fusion procedure for cervical disc disease with moderate to severe osteoporotic condition and segmental loss of lordosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Banwart JC : Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. Spine 20 : 1055-1060, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
  2. Brooke NS, Rorke AW, King AT, Gullan RW : Preliminary experience of carbon fiber cage prostheses for treatment of cervical spine disorders. Br J Neurosug 11 : 221-227, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1080/02688699746285
  3. Cho DY, Liau WR, Lee WY, Liu JT, Chiu CL, Sheu PC : Preliminary experience using a Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 51 : 1343-1350, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200212000-00003
  4. Cunningham BW, Kanayama M, Parker LM, Weis JC, Sefter JC, Fedder IL, et al : Osteogenic protein versus autologous interbody arthrodesis in the sheep thoracic spine : A comparative endoscopic study using the Bagby and Kuslich interbody fusion device. Spine 24 : 509-518, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199903150-00002
  5. Daniel K : Reconstruction of anterior iliac crest after bone graft harvest decreases pain : A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Neurosugery 57 : 526-529, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000170558.70876.E3
  6. Fathie K : Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with methylmethacrylate. Mt Sinai J Med 61 : 246-247, 1994
  7. 11-5 Frank K, Robert P, Jan S, Christian B, Georg D, Norbert P, et al : Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Spine 26 : 1850-1857, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200109010-00007
  8. Geer C, Selden NRW, Papadopoulos SM : Anterior cervical plate fixation in the treatment of single level cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg 90 : 410- 416, 1999
  9. Herkowitz HN : A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine 13 : 774-780, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00011
  10. Kanim LEA, Bae HW, Zhao L, Wonq P, Delamarter RB, Dawson EG, et al : Inter and intravariablity of BMPs in commercially available demineralized bone matrices. Spine 23 : 159-167, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199801150-00003
  11. Kim P, Wakai S, Matsuo S, Moriyama T, Kirino T : Bisegmental cervical interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite implants : Surgical results and longterm observation in 70 cases. J Neurosurg 88 : 21-27, 1998 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.1.0021
  12. Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Booth RE Jr : Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts : A review of complications and technique. Spine 14 : 1324-1331, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198912000-00009
  13. Lee CJ, Rhee DY, Heo W, Yoon JW, Park HS : The Advantages of rectangular titanium cage (RABEA) fusion after anterior cervical discectomy : Comparative study of fibula allograft. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 36 : 448-453, 2004
  14. Lozes G, Fawaz A, Cama A, Krivosic I, Devos P, Herant M, et al : Discectomies of the lower cervical spine using interbody biopolymer (BOP) implants : Advantage in the treatment of complicated cervical arthrosis : A review of 150 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 96 : 88-93, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01456164
  15. Madawi AA, Powell M, Crockard HA : Biocompatible osteoconductive polymer versus iliac graft : A prospective comparative study for the evaluation of fusion pattern after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine 21 : 2123-2129, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199609150-00013
  16. Martin GJ, Haid RW, MacMillan M, Rodts GE Jr, Berkman R : Anterior cervical discectomy with freeze-dried fibula allograft. Spine 24 : 852-859, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905010-00004
  17. Matge G : Anterior interbody fusion with the BAK-cage in cervical spondylosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140 : 1-8, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050049
  18. Morone MA, Boden SD : Experimental posterolateral spinal fusion with a demineralized bone matrix gel. Spine 23 : 159-167, 1998
  19. Robinson RA, Walker AE, Ferlic DC : The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg 44 : 1569-1587, 1962 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196244080-00007
  20. Roosen K : Bone cement as replacement material of cervical discs. Fortschr Med 100 : 2120-2126, 1982
  21. Sawin PD, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH : A comparative analysis of fusion rate and donor-site morbidity for autogenous rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions. J Neurosurg 88 : 255-265, 1998 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0255
  22. Thalgott JS, Fritts K, Giuffre JM, Timlin M : Anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine with coralline hydroxyapatite. Spine 24 : 1295-1299, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199907010-00005
  23. Toth JM, An HS, Lim TH, Ran Y, Weiss NG, Lundberq WR, et al : Evaluation of porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for anterior cervical interbody fusion in a caprine model. Spine 20 : 2203-2210, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199510001-00005
  24. Watters WC III, Levinthal R : Anterior cervical discectomy with and without fusion : results, complications, and long-term follow-up. Spine 19 : 2343-2347, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199410150-00016
  25. Wilke HJ, Kettler A, Goetz C, Claes L : Subsidence resulting from simulated postoperative neck movements : An in vitro investigation with a new cervical fusion cage. Spine 25 : 2762-2770, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011010-00008
  26. Wozney JM : Overview of bone morphogenetic proteins. Spine 27 : 2- 8, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200208151-00002
  27. Zdeblick TA, Ghanayem AJ, Rapoff AJ, Swain C, Bassett T, Cooke ME, et al : Cervical interbody fusion cages : An animal model with and without bone morphogenetic protein. Spine 23 : 758-765, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199804010-00002
  28. Zeidman SM, Ducker TB, Raycroft J : Trends and complications in cervical spine surgery. J Spinal Disord 10 : 523-526, 1997