한국식생활문화학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture)

  • 제22권6호
  • /
  • Pages.820-826
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-7060(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-7148(eISSN)
한국식생활문화학회 (Korean Society of Food Culture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

밥의 종류에 따른 in vitro 분해율 및 관능적 특성

In vitro Digestibility and Sensory Properties of different Bap(Cooked Rice)

  • 김윤선 (고려대학교 사범대학 가정교육과) ;
  • 이귀주 (고려대학교 사범대학 가정교육과)
  • Kim, Yoon-Sun (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Gui-Chu (Department of Home Economics Education, College of Education, Korea University)
  • 발행 : 2007.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Different types of bap(cooked rice) was cooked using barley or/and SoRiTae with rice as the base. Total(TS), rapidly digestible(RDS), slowly digestible(SDS) and resistant(RS) starch fractions were determined. Other physicochemical properties such as moisture, protein, amylose contents, protein digestion in vitro and color values as well as sensory properties of different bap were also investigated. Cooked rice with SoRiTae(RiSo) showed the highest moisture content of 63.9%, whereas other bap showed simillar content ranging from 62.3-63.0%. Crude protein content of RiSo was the highest, while that of cooked rice(Ri) was the lowest(p<0.05). Amylose content of RiBa was the highest, while that of RiSo was the lowest(p<0.05). In in vitro protein digestibility(IVPD), cooked rice with barley and SoRiTae(RiBaSo) was the highest, while Ri was the lowest, showing no significant difference at p<0.05. In starch fractions, as barley or/and SoRiTae were added to rice, a decrease in RDS content and increases in SDS and RS contents were observed. In addition, starch digestion index(SDI), which derived as an indicator of their in vitro starch digestibility and rapidly available glucose(RAG) value, which determined as a predictor of potential glycemic response decreased. A decrease in L value from RiSo and RiBaSo, which comprised of SoRiTae and increases in a and b values in RiSo and RiBa were observed, respectively. All sensory parameters involving color, glossiness, sweet taste, wetness, roughness, hardness and stickiness were shown to be a significant difference except sweet taste among different bap(p<0.05). L value of instrumental characteristic was negatively correlated with color of sensory characteristic and a value was positively correlated. Significant negative correlation was found between RS content and glossiness, however, positive correlation with roughness and hardness, respectively. These results suggested that cooked rice mixed with barley and SoRiTae contain significant RS and SDS contents and may improve diabetes and hyperlipidemia, due to the lowering RDS and RAG, respectively.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 권대영, 양혜정. 2003. 전통밥의 연구 및 산업화 동향. 식품기술 16(2): 38-76
  2. 윤서석. 1999. 우리나라 식생활문화의 역사. 신광출판사. 서울. p355
  3. 홍석모. 이석호 역주. 1991. 동국세시기. 동문선. 서울. p46
  4. AO.A.C. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 5th edition. Association of officially analytical chemists. Washington DC
  5. Asp NG. 1995. Classification and methology of food carbohydrates as related to nutritional effects. Am J. Clin Nutr Suppl., 61:930S-937S https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/61.4.930S
  6. Aarathi A, Urooj A, Puttaraj S. 2003. In vitro starch digestibility and nutritionally important starch fractions in cereals and their mixtures. Starch/Starke, 55:94-99 https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200390022
  7. Bae EA, Moon GS. 1997. A study of the antioxidative activities of Korean soybean. J. Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr., 26:203-208
  8. Eliasson AC. 1996. Carbohydrate in foods. University of Lund. Sweden. Marcel Dekker, Inc. p 534
  9. Englyst HN, Anderson V, Cummings JH. 1983. Starch and nonstarch polysaccharides in some cereal foods. J. Sci Food Agric., 34:1434-1440 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740341219
  10. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Currunings JH. 1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J. of Clin Nutr., 46(2):33-50
  11. Englyst HN, Veenstra J, Hudson GJ. 1996. Measurement of rapidly available glucose(RAG) in plant foods: a potential in vitro predictor of the glycemic response. Br J. Nutr., 75:327-337 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19960137
  12. Ezeogu Ll, Duodu KG, Taylor JRN. 2005. Effects of endosperm texture and cooking conditions on the in vitro starch digestibility of sorghum and maize flours. J. Cereal Science, 42:33-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2005.02.002
  13. FAO/WHO. 1990. Protein quality evaluation (Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation held in Bethesda, MD, USA, Dec. 1989). FAO. Rome. Italy
  14. Gahlawat P, Sehgal S. 1998. Protein and starch digestibility and mineral availability of products developed from potato, soy and com flour. Plant Foods Hum Nutr., 52(2):151-160 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008045023304
  15. Hill MJ. 1995. Mini-symposium: dietary fibre, butyrate and colorectal cancer. Eur J. of Cancer Prevention, 4:341-378
  16. Hsu HW, Vavak DL, Satterlee LD, Miller GA. 1977. A multienzyme technique for estimating protein digestibility. J. Food Sci., 42(5):1269-1273 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1977.tb14476.x
  17. Hylla S, Gostner A, Dusel G, Anger H, Bartram HP, Christl SU, Kasper H, Scheppach W. 1998. Effects of resistant starch on the colon in healthy volunteers: possible implications for cancer prevention. Am J. Clin Nutr., 67:136-142 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/67.1.136
  18. Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielder H, Baldwin JM. 1981. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J. of Clin Nutr., 34:362-366 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/34.3.362
  19. Juliano BO. 1971. A Simplified assay for milled-rice amylose. Cereal Sci Today, 16(10):334-338
  20. Kim KS, Kim MJ, Lee KA, Kwon DY. 2003. Physico-chemical properties of Korean traditional soybeans. Korean J. Food Sci Technol., 35(3):335-341
  21. Kim WJ, Chung NY, Kim SK, Lee AR, Lee SK, Ha YC, Baik MY. 1995. Sensory characteristics of cooked rices differing in moisture contents. Korean J. Food Sci Technol., 27(6):885-890
  22. Kim YS, Lee GC. 2006. A survey on the consumption and satisfaction degree of the cooked rice mixed with multigrain in Seoul. Kyeonggi and Kangwon area. Korean J. Food Culture, 21(6):661-669
  23. Kim YS, Park SR, Lee YS, Chung H, Koh KO, Kim HS. 2005. Determination of tocopherol and tocotrienol contents in rice cooked with various cereals. J. Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr., 34(8):1289-1292 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.8.1289
  24. Kum JS, Lee CH, Baek KH, Lee SH, Lee HY. 1995. Influence of cultivar on rice starch and cooking properties. Korean J. Food Sci Technol., 27:365-369
  25. Lee JH, Kim SS, Suh DS, Kim KO. 2001. Effects of storage form and period of refrigerated rice on sensory properties of cooked rice and on physicochemical properties of milled and cooked rice. Korean J. Food Sci Technol., 33(4):427-436
  26. Lim SB, Kang MS, Jwa MK, Song DJ, Oh YJ. 2003. Characteristics of cooked rice by adding grains and legumes. J. Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr., 32(1):52-57 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2003.32.1.052
  27. Min BK, Hong SH, Shin MG, Jung J. 1994. Study on the determination of the amount of added water for rice cooking by extrusion test of cooked rice. Korean J. Food Sci Technol., 26(1):98-101
  28. Mun SH, Baik MY, Shin MS. 1997. Effect of amylose content on the physical properties of resistant starches. Korean J. Food Sci Technol., 29(3):516-521
  29. Negi A, Boora P, khetarpaul N. 2001. Starch and protein digestibility of newly released moth bean cultivars:Effect of soaking, dehulling, germination and pressure cooking. Nahrung/Food, 45(4):251-254 https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3803(20010801)45:4<251::AID-FOOD251>3.0.CO;2-V
  30. Oh GS, Na HS, Lee YS, Kim K, Kim SK. 2002. Texture of cooked milled added waxy black rice and glutinous rice. Korean J. Food Sci Technol., 34(2):213-219
  31. Rosario S, Jayashree A. 2000. Effect of domestic processing methods on the starch, non-starch polysaccharides and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of three varieties of rice with varying levels of amylose. Food Chem., 70:107-111
  32. Themieier H, Hollmann J, Neese U, Lindhauer MG. 2005. Structural and morphological factors influencing the quantification of resistant starch II in starches of different botanical origin. Carbohydrate Polymer, 61:72-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.02.017
  33. Vasanthan T, Gaosong J, Yeung J, Li J. 2002. Dietary fiber proftle of barley flour as affected by extrusion cooking. Food Chem., 77(1):35-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00318-1
  34. Velasco ZI, Rascon A, Tovar J. 1997. Enzymic availability of starch in cooked black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cowpeas (Vigna sp.). J. Agric Food Chem., 45:1548-1551 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf960798z
  35. Wolf BW, Bauer LL, Fahey GC. 1999. Effects of chemical modification on in vitro rate and extent of food starch digestion: An attempt to discover a slowly digested starch. J. Agric Food Chem., 47:4178-4183 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9813900