INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial OTC drugs are essential for the treatment of diseases in humans and animals. OTC is widely found in hatchery fishes, calf veals, and cow’s milk from animals with low concentration ranges in their body and fluid systems, in the medical and environmental sciences. Sensitive detection methods are in demand in their vivo or vitro systems. Various analytical techniques for the drug and its analogs have been researched on. Most of the common methods employ separation and photometric systems, as, for example, high-performance liquid chromatography,1-6 mass spectrometry,7-10 near-infrared spectroscopy,11 second-derivative synchronous spectrofluorimetry,12 and the capillary electrophoresis system.13 Some of these methods are composed of a temperature control system, a separate column, an injection system, and other photometric or electrochemical detection systems. In analytical chemistry, more sensitive and simple methods are in demand. Stripping voltammetry is particularly useful and popular for trace analysis.14-17 since this accumulation technique is simple and sensitive and is thus applicable with chromatography, electrophoresis and other analytical detection systems. Voltammetric methods have rarely been researched on for OTC analysis, however, except in a few recent reports. Plasticmembrane OTC-hydrochloride-selective electrodes arrived at the detection limit of 1.0 × 10-7 M (0.03 ppm),18 amperometric boron-doped diamond (BDD) thin films electrodes arrived at a 10-nM detection limit,19 and the potentiometric and cyclic voltammetric titration methods20 and capillary electrophoresis with the reductive fast cyclic voltammetric detection method arrived at a 1.5 × 10-6-mol/L detection limit.21 Capillary electrophoresis of some tetracycline antibiotics coupled with reductive fast cyclic voltammetric detection. In vivo or vitro systems, OTC has very low concentration ranges, making more sensitive detection limits in demand. This study researched on a DNA immobilized onto a carbon nanotube electrode for OTC analysis, employing CV and SWASV in a stripping mode, which is relatively less expensive, more sensitive than other convenient voltammetric results, and can be used for tissue analysis with low detection limits. On the other hand, DNA and carbon nanotubes have a specific affinity in biosensors.22-26 Many researches have examined the interaction of DNA with a carbon nanotube and their immobilization effects.27-30 In this study, the properties of DNA and a carbon nanotube paste electrode were combined, and low detection ranges of OTC analysis were arrived at. The optimized results were applied to antibacterial agent analysis in the fish tissue and can be applied in any other field of OTC analysis.
EXPERIMENT
Apparatus, Reagents and Procedure
Voltammetric measurements were taken using a CHI660A from Systems, Inc. A handmade PE electrode with a 0.5-mm diameter and a 10-mm length was used as the working electrode; an Ag/AgCl electrode, as the reference electrode; and a platinum wire, as the auxiliary electrode. All electrolyte solutions were prepared from doubledistilled water (~18-M Ohm cm-1). A 0.1-M ammonium phosphate solution served as the supporting electrolyte. All other reagents were of analytical grade. The PE working electrode was handmade by mixing a 40% carbon nanotube (0.4 gram, from Nanostructured & Amorphous Materials, Inc.) and a 40% double-stranded DNA (0.4 gram, prepared from calf thymus sigma) with 20% mineral oil (0.2 gram) in a mortar for 30 minutes. The paste was deposited inside the body of a capillary tube glass (2 mm in diameter and 1 cm long), and the electric contact between the electrode and the potentiostat was established with a 1-mm-diameter copper wire. The electrode surface was polished using a cloth felt pad with a 0.05-mm alumina slurry. The three-electrode system was immersed in a stirred solution of 0.1-M phosphate buffer (pH 4.5). DNA immobilization was performed through a cyclic scan with an initial potential of +1.6 V, a switching potential of -1.6 V, and a scan rate of 0.5 mVs-1 with a tan cyclic repeat to stabilize the electrode surface. Pre-concentration prior to cyclic and SW stripping was carried out at an open circuit. CV and SWASV were then performed, with the common parameter for CV being a scan rate of 100 mVs-1. The common parameters for the stripping were as follows: an accumulation potential of -1.7 V (vs. that of the Ag/AgCl reference electrode); a final potential of 1.0 V; a deposition time of 500 s; a quiet time of 2 s; an SW amplitude of 35 mV; an SW frequency of 357 Hz; and an increment potential of 9 mV. Background voltammograms were recorded with the phosphate buffer in the absence of OTC.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Cyclic Voltammetric Behavior of OTC on the PE
First, various electrolyte acid, base and buffer solutions were searched at a high OTC strength. Phosphate solutions of 0.1 M were found to have good sensitivity. Thus, various OTC concentration effects were examined using CV. Fig. 1 shows the cyclic voltammograms of the background electrolyte solutions for the 0.1-M ammonium phosphate with pH 4.5. The latter’s raw and 10 given concentration ranges were 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 ngL-1 OTC at a sweep rate of 100 mVs-1 on the PE. At the oxidation scan, an anodic peak and a shoulder at 0.18 V were obtained, which were well extracted from the background discharge and sensitively appeared. Upon scan reversal, no corresponding reduction peak emerged in any potential. Other SW stripping conditions were examined with this anodic peak current. At these conditions, the sloop ratio of Δx/Δy = 7.8556 and the maximum peak current of 78.18×10-7 A were sensitively obtained with very low detection ranges, which can be applied in tissue and body fluid analysis. Other concentration ranges at the mg and ug levels were also examined, and their results appeared well linearly. Although not shown here, in the nanogram working ranges, an analytical application was performed with the known content of 60 mgL-1 of the N company’s drug samples. The results were obtained using standard addition methods by extrapolating the linear curve. A 59.0 mgL-1 OTC concentration was detected at 99 % recovery. At this condition, more sensitive SW stripping techniques were examined at an 0.18 V peak potential. Moreover, the electrode lifespan was examined at CV conditions, for which a onemonth-long time was used. The electrode surface was cleaned each time simply with weighing paper.
Fig. 1.Various concentration effects of CV for 1-10-ngL-1 OTC, at a scan rate of 100 mVs-1 in a 0.1-M ammonium phosphate buffer (pH 5.5).
Effects of Hydrogen Ionic Strength, SW Amplitude, and Accumulation Time
The electrochemical behavior of OTC was dependent on the electrolyte solutions and the hydrogen ionic strength. Thus, various concentrations of the phosphate electrolyte solutions, from 0.01 to 0.5 mol, were tested as possible supporting electrolytes. The 0.1-M phosphate buffer solution was found to have the best peak sensitivity. Then the same solutions were examined for their hydrogen ionic strength, and the results are shown in Fig. 2(A). The peak current did not change from pH 3.7 to pH 4.6, reached its maximum at pH 5.5, and decreased at a higher pH range. At the other pH ranges peak width are broad and sensitivity is weak. A pH of 5.5 was assumed at a maximum current of 6.53 × 10-5 A. This solution was used for the fixed concentration of 10 mgL-1 of OTC. Thus, all other solutions were used with this 5.5 pH strength, after which other SW amplitude parameters were examined. The results are shown in Fig. 2(B). For the range of 0.01-0.25 V, the peak high responded very slowly, whereas 0.35 V was obtained at the maximum peak current of 278 × 10-8 A. At the higher ranges, the peak width broadened and the peak current decreased, their amplitude effects were poorer than those of the pH peak high, and all their peak widths broadened. Then the accumulation potential was examined in the negative range from -1.0 V to -2.0 V with a positive direction. The -1.7 V accumulation potential turned out to be sensitive, and a sharp peak width appeared at the maximum peak current of 8.722 × 10-5 A that was more sensitive than the SW frequency and the solutions’ pH effects. Moreover, the positive potential was examined for a cathodic reaction, and no peak signals appeared.
Fig. 2.(A): Electrolyte solutions’ pH effect for 2.7, 3.2, 3.7, 4.1, 4.6, 5.1, 5.5, 5.9, 6.4 and 7. (B): SW amplitude of 0.01, 0.04, 0.07, 0.12, 0.16, 0.2, 0.25, 0.29, 0.3 and 0.35. (C): SW accumulation potentials of -1.0, -1.2, -1.3, -1.4, -1.6, -1.7, -1.8, -1.0 and -2.0 for the 10-mgL-1 fixed OTC concentration. Other conditions in Fig. 3 were held constant.
Effects of Various SW Voltammetric Parameters of Frequency and Increment Potentials
In Fig. 3(A), various SW frequencies are shown in the range of 50 to 500 Hz with 10 points at the fixed concentration of 10 mgL-1 of OTC, in which other experimental conditions in Fig. 2 were held constant. Their peak current increased as their frequency increased, exhibiting a maximum at about 357 Hz with a 26.05 × 10-6 A peak high. Thus, the optimal frequency was determined to be 357 Hz, and at the other ranges, the peak width broadened and slowly disappeared. At the maximum conditions, other parameters of the SW increment potentials were examined. Fig. 3(B) illustrates the stripping peak current of OTC as a function of the SW increment potential range of 1-10 mV with 10 points at a 10-mg-1 fixed OTC concentration, with an accumulation time of a 500 s and a deposition potential of -1.7 V. At the range of 1-3 mV, the peak currents quickly decreased. At the higher range of 9 mV, the peak width sharply appeared and the peak response increased much more significantly. At this potential, a peak high of 2.398 × 10-5 A was obtained, and the results were more sensitive than the SW frequency effects. At these maximum conditions, various possible interference species with metals and other antimicrobial analogies were tested, with a fixed OTC concentration of 1 mgL-1. The criterion used for the presence of interference was a 5 % or greater change in the peak current of OTC. The following levels did not show any interference: 10-mgL-1 doxycycline and 10-mgL-1 chlorotetracycline. On the other hand, 10-mgL-1 Ba(II), 10-mgL-1 Co(II), 10-mgL-1 Ca(II), 10-mgL-1 Hg(II), 10-mgL-1 Bi(II), 10-mgL-1 Fe(II), 10-mgL-1 Ge(IV), 10-mgL-1 Cr(III), and 10-mgL-1 tetracycline yielded -77.4%, 428.2%, -91.0%, 1,233.9%, -49.8%, 3779.9%, 41.85%, -10.9% and 12.7% interference, respectively. The % means depression in the OTC peak current. At this time, mercury and iron ions quickly interfered in the peak current high. Other interference ions can be corrected using standard addition methods.
Fig. 3.(A): SW stripping voltammetric peak current at the frequency levels of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 312, 357, 416, 454 and 500 Hz. (B): Increment potentials of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 mV for the 10-mg-1 OTC solution. Other conditions in Fig. 2 were held constant.
Effects of Concentration, Linear Range, Detection Limits, and Application
At the optimized conditions, various SWASV working ranges were examined. mg and ug working revels were obtained although not shown here, and more sensitive nanogram ranges were arrived at. The raw results are shown in Fig. 4(A) for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 ngL-1 at the optimum conditions. After the background current was subtracted from the measured currents, a sloop ratio of Δx/Δy = 1.8835 sensitively responded, and a regression yield of the y: current in amperes and the x: concentration at the ngL-1 levels with a correlation coefficient of 0.9945 was obtained. The precisions for the 15th repeated determination of the 0.1-mgL-1 OTC solutions yielded relative standard deviations of 0.067%. The peak current turned out to be highly reproducible. At these conditions, the detection limit of 0.4-ngL-1 of OTC was estimated based on the signal-to-noise (S/N) characteristics of the data for the S/N = 3 given optimum conditions. Finally, using this condition, the developed methods can be applied for the determination of OTC concentrations in food samples of hatchery fish tissue. The results are shown in Fig. 4(B). The five curves show the electrolyte blank solution as not having obtained any noise signal. The 0.5-mL diluted tissue was spiked at this voltammogram, and a sensitive peak signal was obtained, after which other standard solutions of 5, 10 and 15 ngL-1 of OTC were spiked, their peaks linearly increased, and the standard addition methods were applied and used to calculate the OTC values of 15.5-ng/Kg body weight and R2 = 0.9969 OTC that were obtained. All the CV and SWASV applications obtained satisfactory values.
Fig. 4.(A): Various concentration effects of SW with a 1-10-ngL-1 OTC spike. (B): Analytical application for the five curves for the electrolyte blank, then the 0.5-mL diluted tissue spike, then standard solutions of the 5-, 10- and 15-ngL-1 OTC spike. Other conditions in Fig. 3 were held constant.
CONCLUSION
To detect the antimicrobial drug OTC using voltammetry, a DNA immobilized on a carbon nanotube paste electrode was examined, as were optimum analytical conditions, and finally, very low concentration ranges were used that were found to have more sensitive detection limits than other common voltammetric methods.18,19,21 The optimized conditions can be applied in hatchery fish tissue. The results can be used in commercial drug quality control or any other OTC analysis. The use of a PE electrode is much simpler and more stable over a longer time.
References
- Papadoyannis, I. N.; Samanidou, V. F.; Kovatsi, L. A. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2000, 23, 275 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00300-9
- Hisao Oka.; Yuko Ito, & Hiroshi Matsumoto. Journal of Chromatography A. 2000, 882, 109 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01316-3
- Paul, A. Blackwell.; Hans-Christian Holten Ltzhoft.; Hai-Ping Mab:, Bent Halling-Sorensen.; Alistair B. A. Boxall, & Paul Kay Fast and robust. Journal of Chromatograph A. 2004, 1045, 111
- Xiaojing Ding, & Shifen Mou. Journal of Chromatography A. 2000, 897, 205 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00779-2
- Rosie Coyne.; Oivind Bergh, & Ole Bent Samuelsen. Journal of Chromatography B. 2004, 810, 325 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.08.015
- Cinquina, A. L.; Longo, F.; Anastasi, G.; Giannetti, L.; Cozzan, R. Journal of Chromatography A. 2003, 987, 227 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01446-2
- Zhu, J.; Snow, D. D.; Cassada, D. A.; Monson, S. J.; Spalding, R. F. Journal of Chromatography A. 2001, 928, 177 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01139-6
- Anne Kruse Lykkeberg, Bent Halling-Soorensen, Claus Cornett, Jette Tjornelund, & Steen Honor Hansen. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2004, 34, 325 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00500-4
- Marc Cherlet, Mario Schelkens, Siska Croubels, & Patrick De Backer. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2003, 492, 199 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(03)00341-6
- Anne Marie Jacobsen, Bent Halling-Sorensen, Flemming Ingerslev, & Steen Honor Hansen. Journal of Chromatography A. 2004, 1038, 157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.03.034
- Nataa Smolaa, & Uros Urleb. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2000, 410, 203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00891-0
- Fernandez-Gonzlez, R.; Marcia-Falcn, M. S.; Simal-Gndara, J. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004, 455, 143
- Nozal, L.; Arce L.; Simonet, B. M.; Rios, A.; Valcrcel, M. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004, 517, 89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.04.050
- Joseph Wang.; Beatriz Serra.; Suw Young Ly.; Jianmin Lu, & Jose M. Pingarron. Talanta. 2001, 54, 147 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00646-9
- Joseph Wang.; Jianmin Lu.; Suw Young Ly.; Maika Vuki.; Baomin Tian.; William K. Adeniyi, & Ruben A. Armendariz. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 2659 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac991054y
- Suw Young Ly.; Jung Ik Chae.; Young Sam Jung.; Woon Won Jung.; Hye Jeong Lee, & Seong Ho Lee. Nahrung/Food. 2004, 48. 201 https://doi.org/10.1002/food.200300394
- Suw Young Ly.; Duck Ho Kim, & Myung Hoon Kim. Talanta. 2002, 58, 919 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00442-3
- Xian Xiang Sun.; Xu Zhang, & Hassan, Y.; Aboul-Enein. IL FARMACO. 2004, 59, 307 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farmac.2003.09.002
- Wangfuengkanagul, N.; Siangproh, W.; Chailapakul, O. Talanta. 2004, 64, 1183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2004.04.032
- Marzanna Kurzawa, & Agnieszka Kowalczyk-Marzec. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2004, 34, 95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japna.2003.08.010
- Jinkui Zhou.; Geoff C. Gerhardt.; Andrej Baranski, & Richard Cassidy. Journal of Chromatography A. 1999, 839, 193 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00152-1
- Eugenii Katz, & Itamar Willner. Chem Phys Chem. 2004, 5, 1084 https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200400193
- Wanga, S. G.; Ruili Wang.; Sellin, P. J.; Qing Zhang. 2004, 325, 1433
- Randhir, P. Deo.; Joseph Wang. Electrochemistry Communications. 2004, 6, 284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2004.01.003
- Ningning Zhu.; Zhu Chang, Pingang He.; Yuzhi Fang. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2005, 545, 21 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.04.015
- Shifeng Hou.; Jiahai Wang.; Charles R. Martin. J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2005, 127, 8586 https://doi.org/10.1021/ja042343t
- Manli Guo.; Jinhua Chen.; Dengyou Liu.; Lihua Nie, & Shouzhuo Yao. Bioelectrochemistry. 2004, 62, 29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.10.005
- Maria L. Pedano, & Gustavo A. Rivas. Electrochemistry Communications. 2004, 6, 10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2003.10.008
- Kagan Kerman.; Yasutaka Morita.; Yuzuru Takamura.; Mehmet Ozsoz, & Eiichi Tamiya. Electroanalysis. 2004, 16, 1667 https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200303025
- Dovbeshko, G. I.; Repnytska, O. P.; Obraztsova, E. D.; Shtogun, Y. V. Chemical Physics Letters. 2003, 372, 432 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00429-9
Cited by
- Carbon paste electrodes in the new millennium vol.7, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-009-0097-9
- Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetric Determination of Mangiferin Using an Activated Chitosan Modified Carbon Paste Electrode vol.05, pp.07, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2014.57051