A Study on the Development of Metadata Standard for Research Outcomes Information in Science & Technology

과학기술분야의 연구성과물정보 표준 메타데이터 개발에 관한 연구

  • Park, Dong-Jin (Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Kongju National University)
  • 박동진 (공주대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Published : 2006.12.31

Abstract

It has lately been difficult to share the research outcomes information due to the information system not being compatible with one another. To solve this problem, it is believed that a meta data standard needs to be developed for all the institutions to follow. This paper shows how to make the research outcome of Science and Technology R&D project a standard metadata. We first classified all the research outcome into the following seven groups: Report, Journal article, Presentation material, Book, Dissertation, Industrial rights, and Technology development. We then identified three components that constitute a standard metadata. We employed the Dublin Core Metadata Set and CERIF(Common European Research Information Format) for worldwide interoperability. This Standard can be applied in the following areas: 1) Developing a standard architecture to manage research result within the organization. 2) Designing a conceptual/logical database to measure and evaluate the research outcome. 3) Developing a metadata system for research outcome as a subsystem of an Industrial Technology MDR (Metadata Registry) System.

Keywords

References

  1. 고영만, '메타데이터 표준화와 메타데이터 레지스트리', 국회도서관, 국회도서관보, 42(11) : 18-26, 2005
  2. 과학기술부; 국가 R&D 성과활용 관련 설문조사, 2005
  3. 과학기술통합검색, www.yeskisti.net, 2006
  4. 김미영; '회색문헌의 생산현황과 관리-부산대학교내 37 연구소를 중심으로', 석사학위논문, 부산대학교, 2002
  5. 남영준; '디지털 시대의 회색문헌 이용 활성화에 관한 연구', 한국정보관리학회지, 19(4) : 234-255, 2002 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2002.19.4.234
  6. Almeida, Mario do G.G.; 'Control Access for Grey Literature in Brazil: A Proposal,' In fourth Internalanoit Conference on Grey Literature, 1999
  7. Auger, C. P.; Information Sources in Grey Literature,4th ed. London, 1996
  8. Chen, H. and Chen, C.; 'Metadata Development for digital Libraries and Museums-Taiwan's Experience,' DC-2001, NII, Tokyo, 2001
  9. CRIS; CERIF(Common European Research Information Format) http://www.eurocris.org/en/taskgroups/cerif, 2004
  10. Dublin Core Metadata Intiative; http://dublincore.org, 2005
  11. Jeffery; K.; 'An Architecture for Grey Literature in a R&D,' In fourth International Conference on Grey Literature, 1999
  12. Knapp, M., Dexter, S., and McLaughlin, R.; 'Metadata Co-Development: A Process Resulting in Metadata about Technical Assistance to Educators,' Proceedings of the 13th International WWW Conference, 2004
  13. Lightle, K.; 'Using Metadata Standards to Support Interoperability,' in CM Gynn & SR Acker (eds.), Learning Objects: Contexts and Connections, pp. 43-48, 2003
  14. Matthews, B., Wilson, M., and Kleese-van Dam, K., 'Accessing the Outputs of Science Project,' Proceedings, 6th International Conference on CRIS, 2002
  15. Miller, E.; 'An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework,' http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may98/miller/05miller.html, 1998
  16. Mooney S.; 'Interoperability,' D-Lib Magazine,Jan. 2001
  17. Steinacker A., Ghavam A., and Steinmetzm R.; 'Metadata Standards for Web-Based Resource,' IEEE Multimedia, 8(1) : 70-76, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1109/93.923956
  18. Xie, R. and Shibaski R.; 'Standardization Framework for CEOP Metadata Development and Application,' CEOP/IGWCO Joint Meeting, University of Tokyo, 2005