IE interfaces (산업공학)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of Risk Factors in Water Supply Networks using PROMETHEE and ANP

PROMETHEE와 ANP 기법을 활용한 상수도관망의 위험요소 평가

  • Hong, Sung-Jun (Department of Industrial Systems and Information Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Dae (Department of Industrial Systems and Information Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Sheung-Kown (Department of Industrial Systems and Information Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Joong-Hoon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea University)
  • 홍성준 (고려대학교산업시스템정보공학과) ;
  • 이용대 (고려대학교산업시스템정보공학과) ;
  • 김승권 (고려대학교산업시스템정보공학과) ;
  • 김중훈 (고려대학교사회환경시스템공학과)
  • Received : 20050900
  • Accepted : 20060300
  • Published : 2006.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the priority of risk factors in supplying water through water supply pipeline network was evaluated by PROMETHEE and ANP multi-criteria decision analysis. We chose 'corrosion', 'burst' and 'water pollution' in pipe as major reference criteria and selected eight risk factors to evaluate the priority, and then we compared the results of PROMETHEE with those of ANP. We also analyzed the results of the sensitivity analysis by changing the weights and parameters of preference functions in PROMETHEE. We investigated the possibility of integrating two methods by using the results of ANP as the weights of preference function in PROMETHEE. The priority of risk factors for supplying municipal water which is evaluated by this study may provide basic data to establish a contingency plan for accidents, or to establish the specific emergency response procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. Brans,J. P. and Vincke, PH.(1985), A Preference Ranking Organisation Method, Management Science, 2(6), 647-656
  2. Cathy, M., Johan, S., Klaas D. and Alain V.(2004), PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 153,307-317 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X
  3. Hokkanen,J. and Salminen, P.(1997), ELECTREIlI and IV Decision Aids in an Environmental Problem, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 215-226 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199707)6:4<215::AID-MCDA139>3.0.CO;2-P
  4. Hong, S-J., Lee, Y-D., Kim, S-K. and Kim,J-H.(2006), Evaluation of Risk Factors to Detect Anomaly in Water Supply Networks-Based on the PROMETHEE and ANP-,Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association, 39(1) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.1.035
  5. Keeney, R. and Raiffa, H.,(1976), Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Trade off, John Wiley & Sons, Now York
  6. Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation(2001), Water Supply Facility Maintenance & Management Manual, Ministry Construction & Transportation
  7. Korea Institute of Construction Technology(2004), Development of Optimal Management System for Water Pipeline Network, Ministry of Environment
  8. Maystre, L. Y.(1999), ELECTRE and Decision Support: Methods and Applications in Engineering and Infrastructure Investment, Kluwer Academic, Boston
  9. Meade, L. M. and Sarkis, J.(1998), Strategic Analysis of Logistics and Supply Chain Management Systems using the Analytical Network Process, Transpn Res-E(Loigistics and Transpn Rev.), 34(3), 201-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(98)00012-X
  10. Min, J-H. and Song, Y-M.(2003), A Comparison of MAUT, AHP and PROMETHEE for Multicriteria Decisions, 2003 The Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference, 2, 229-232
  11. Park, S-Y., Kim, J-H. and Kim, S-K.(2005), A Mixed-Integer Programming Model to Draw the Concordance Level and the Kernel Set for the Implementation of ELECTRE IS, Journal of the Korean of Industrial Engineers, 31(4),265-276
  12. Roy, B.(1968), Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples(la method ELECTRE), Revue Informatique et Resherche Operationnelle, 8, 57-75
  13. Roy, B. and Hugonnard,J. C.(1982), Ranking of Suburban LIne Extension Projects on the Paris Metro System by a Multicriteria Method, Transportation Research, 16(4),301-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(82)90057-7
  14. Saaty, T. L. (1996), Decision making with dependence and feedback the analytic network process, RWS Publisher, USA
  15. Vargas, L. G.(1990), An overview of the analytic hierarchy process & its applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 2-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  16. Zahedi(1986), The Analytic Hierarchy Process - A Survey of the Method and its Applications, INTERFACES, 16(4),96-108