Correlation among Growth Characteristics according to the Cultivated Years of Saururus chinensis BAILL.

재배년수에 따른 삼백초(三白草)의 생육형질간 상관관계

  • Nam Sang-Young (Chungbuk Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Kim Min-Ja (Chungbuk Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Yun Tae (Chungbuk Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Kim Hong-Sig (Dept. of Plant Resources, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jong Seung-Keun (Dept. of Plant Resources, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim In-Jae (Chungbuk Agricultural Research and Extension Services)
  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

The growth of stem and leaves in Saururus chinensis. in the 2nd year was markedly increased comparing to that in the 1st year, however the growth in the 3rd you was not increased significantly. The growth in the 1st yew was greater in low planting density, while the growth in the 3rd year decreased in higher planting densities. The num- ber of leaves and stems per unit area increased in higher planting densities and later years. The weight of stem and leaves in Saururus chinensis was higher at the highest planting density in the 1st yew, at $40{\times}10cm$ planting in the 2nd year and at $40{\times}20cm$ planting in the 3rd year. The weight of rhizome in Saururus chinensis increased greatly in the 2nd you comparing to that in the 1st year, but the increase was insignificant in the 3rd year. The weight of rhizomes in Saururus chinensis showed significant interaction between planting densities and years showed highly significant difference.

삼백초의 지상부 생육은 1년에서 2년차의 생육은 증가 폭이 컸으나, 2년에서 3년차의 생육은 감소하거나 부진하였다. 1년차에서는 소식일수록 생육이 양호하였으나, 3년생은 밀식할수록 차이가 없거나 감소하였다. 단위면적당 엽수와 경수는 재배년수가 경과하고 밀식할수록 많았다. 경엽(莖葉) 수량이 1년생은 밀식에서, 2년생은 $40{\times}10cm$에서, 3년생은 $40{\times}20cm$에서 가장 많았다. 근경중(根莖重)은 1년생에서 2년생은 중량의 증가폭이 켰으나, 2년생에서 3년생은 증가 폭이 둔화되었다. 재식거리간 근경중은 년차 간 고도의 유의성이 있었으며, 경엽중에 비해 매우 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 최봉호. 2000. NEW MYSTAT. 충남대학교 pp. 36-106
  2. 최옥자. 1994. 약초의 성분과 이용. 일월서각. pp. 128
  3. 강병수 등 19인. 2000. 본초학. 영림사. pp. 75
  4. 김태정. 1996. 한국의 자원식물(I권). 서울대학교 출판부. pp. 66-67
  5. 이창복. 1989. 대한식물도감. 향문사. pp. 252
  6. 문관심. 1991. 약초의 성분과 이용. 일월서각. pp. 588-590
  7. Tutupalli, L.V. and Chaubal, M. G. 1975. Saururaceae. V. composition of essential oil from foliage of H.cordata cordata and chemosystematics of Saururaceae. Lloydia 38: 92-96
  8. 농림부. 2004. 특용작물생산실적. pp. 39
  9. 농촌진흥청. 1988. 토양화학분석법(토양, 식물체, 토양미생물). pp. 450
  10. 농촌진흥청. 1995. 농사시험연구조사기준. pp. 485-552
  11. 식품공전. 2005. 식품의약품안전청