Reproductive and Developmental Biology

  • 제30권1호
  • /
  • Pages.41-45
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1738-2432(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0151(eISSN)
한국동물번식학회 (The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction)
권호 표지

Activation by Combined Treatment with Cycloheximide and Electrical Stimulation of In-Vitro Matured Porcine Oocytes Improves Subsequent Parthenogenetic Development

  • Naruse Kenji (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim Hong-Rye (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Shin Young-Min (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Chang Suk-Min (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee Hye-Ran (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Tarte Vaishali (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Quan Yan-Shi (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim Beak-Chul (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park Tae-Young (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Choi Su-Min (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park Chang-Sik (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jin Dong-Il (Research Center for Transgenic and Cloned Pigs, Chungnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Electrical treatment has been widely used for porcine oocytes activation. However, developmental rates following electrical activation of porcine oocytes is relatively inefficient compared to other domestic animals. To investigate the effects of porcine oocytes on combined activation by both chemical and electrical treatment, in-vitro matured oocytes were activated by combined cycloheximide and electrical pulses treatment. Cumulus-free oocytes were exposed with NCSU-23 medium containing cycloheximide $(10{\mu}g/ml)$ for 0, 5, 10, 20, 30 min and then activated by electrical pulse treatment and cultured in PZM-3 for 8 days. Also effects of exposure to $6.25{\mu}M$ calcium ionophore for 2 min for cumulus-free oocytes were tested. The percentage of blastocyst formation in 10 min exposure to $10{\mu}g/ml$ cycloheximide and electrical pulse treatment was significantly increased (P<0.05) than in the control group. And exposure to $6.25{\mu}M$ calcium ionophore for 2 min with $10{\mu}g/ml$ cycloheximide for 10min and electrical pulse treatment significantly increased (P<0.05) the percentage of blastocyst developmental rates than the control group. In conclusion, activation by combined cycloheximide and electrical stimulation treatment promoted the subsequent development of porcine oocytes and improved the subsequence blastocyst development.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bodart JF, Bechard D, Bertout M, Gannon J, Rousseau A, Vilain JP, Flament S (1995): Activation of Xenopus eggs by the kinase inhibitor 6-DMAP suggests a differential regulation of cyclin B and p39(mos) proteolysis. Exp Cell Res 253:413-421
  2. Clarke HJ, Marui Y (1983): The induction of reversible and irreversible chromosome decondensation by protein synthesis inhibition of meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev BioI 97:291-301 https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(83)90087-8
  3. Galli C, Lagutina I, Vassiliev I, Duchi R, Lazzari G (2002): Comparison of microinjection (piezo-electric) and cell fusion for nuclear transfer success with different cell types in cattle. Cloning Stem Cells 4:189-196 https://doi.org/10.1089/15362300260339476
  4. Jilek F, Huttelova R, Petr J, Holubova M, Rozinek J (2000): Activation of pig oocytes using calcium ionophore: effect of protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. Anim Reprod Sci 63:101-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00150-0
  5. Im GS, Liangxue L, Zhonghua L, Yanhong H, David W, Aaron B, Randall SP (2003): In vitro development of preimplantation porcine nuclear transfer embryos cultured in different media and gas atmospheres. Theriogenology 61:1125-1135 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.06.006
  6. Iwamoto M, Onishi A, Fuchimoto D, Somfai T, Takeda K, Tagami T, Hanada H, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Nagai T, Kikuchi K (2005): Low oxygen tension during in vitro maturation of porcine follicular oocytes improves parthenogenetic activation and subsequent development to the blastocyst stage. Theriogenology 63:1277-1289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.05.024
  7. Kim YS, Lee SL, Ock SA, Balasubramanian S, Choe SY, Rho GJ (2005): Development of cloned pig embryos by nuclear transfer following different activation treatments. Mol Reprod Dev 70:308-313 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20211
  8. Lan GC, Han D, Wu YG, Han ZB, Ma SF, Liu XY, Chang CL, Tan JH (2005): Effects of duration, concentration, and timing of ionomycin and 6-dimethylaminopurine (6-DMAP) treatment on activation of goat oocytes. Mol Reprod 71:380-388 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20267
  9. Liu CT, Chen CH, Cheng SP, Ju JC (2002): Parthenogenesis of rabbit oocytes activated by different stimuli. Anim Reprod Sci 70:267-276 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(01)00185-3
  10. Marcus GJ (1990): Activation of cumulus-free mouse oocytes. Mol Repred Dev 26:159-162 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080260210
  11. Petters RM, Wells KD (1993): Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod FertiI 48:61-73
  12. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, Page RL, Mullins J, Ball S, Dai Y, Boone J, Walker S, Ayares DL, Colman A, Campbell KH (2000): Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 407:505-509
  13. Presicce GA, Tang X (1994a): Nuclear dynamics of parthenogenetic development of bovine oocytes matured in vitro for 20 and 40h and activated by combined by ethanol and cycloheximide treatment. Mol Reprod 37:61-68 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080370109
  14. Presicce GA, Tang X (1994b): Parthenogenetic development of bovine oocytes matured in vitro for 24h and activated by ethanol and cycloheximide. Mol Reprod 38:380-385 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080380405
  15. Sirard MA, Whittingham DG, Molinaro M, Vivarelli E (1978): Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes induced by inhibitors of protein synthesis. J Embryol Exp MorphoI 43:157-166
  16. Sirard MA, Florman HM, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, Barnes FL, First NL (1989): Timing of nuclear progression and protein synthesis necessary for meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes. BioI Reprod 40:1257-1263 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod40.6.1257
  17. Ware CB, Barnes FL, Maiki-Laurila M, First NL (1989): Age dependence of bovine oocytes activation. Gamete Res 22:265-275 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120220304
  18. Yamauchi N, Sasada H, Sugawara S, Nagai T (1996): Effect of culture conditions on artificial activation of porcine oocytes matured in vitro. Reprod Fertil 8:1153-1156 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9961153
  19. Yang X, Jiang S, Shi Z (1992): Improved activation by combined cycloheximide and electrical pulse treatment of bovine follicular oocytes matured in vitro for 23 - 24h. BioI Reprod (Suppl.) 46:117 (abstract) https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.1.23
  20. Ye J, Campbell KHS, Craigon J, Luck MR (2005): Dynamic changes in meiotic progression and improvement of developmental competence of pig oocytes in vitro by follicle stimulating hormone and cycloheximide. BioI Reprod 72:399- 406 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.034553
  21. Yi YJ, Park CS (2005): Parthenogenetic development of porcine oocytes treated by ethanol, cycloheximide, cytochalasin B and 6-dimethylaminopurine. Anim Reprod Sci 86:297-304 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.07.007
  22. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM, Iwamura S (2002): Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. BioI Reprod 66:112-119 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.112
  23. Zhu J, Telfer EE, Fletcher J, Springbett A, Dobrinsky JR, De Sousa PA, Wilmut I (2002): Improvement of an electrical activation protocol for porcine oocytes. BioI Reprod 66:635-641 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.3.635