대한공업교육학회지

Korean Institute of Industrial Educations (대한공업교육학회)
권호 표지

A model of the practical skill instruction of the special subject using the problem-based learning in the technical high schools

공업계 고등학교 전문교과의 문제중심학습에 의한 실기수업 모형

  • Received : 2006.10.30
  • Accepted : 2006.12.20
  • Published : 2006.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to development a model of the practical skill instruction of the special subject using the problem-based learning in the technical high schools For the study, various literature researches were reviewed intensively about problem solving process, problem -based learning, and learning principals. The process of the practical skill instruction using the problem-based learning was composed with planning, executing, testing and evaluating. In this practical skill instruction using the problem-based learning, the teacher serves as a coach or guide for students' learning. As a facilitator, the teacher challenges, questions, and stimulates the students in their thinking, problem solving and self-directed study. In this process, students represent problem by thinking aloud, assuming responsibility for their own learning, having self-directed study as well as doing cooperative study, and as a result, education changes move from teacher-centered to student-centered.

본 연구는 급변하는 사회와 산업 현장의 요구에 부응할 수 있는 공업계 고등학교 전문교과 수업의 새로운 접근을 위하여 공업계 고등학교 전문교과의 문제중심학습에 의한 실기수업모형을 개발하여 일, 학습, 삶이 상호연관 되는 질 높은 실기 수업을 적용하는데 도움이 되고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 공업계 고등학교에 적합한 문제중심학습에 의한 실기수업 모형을 개발하기 위해 첫째, 공업계 고등학교의 실기수업에 적합한 문제해결 과정에 관한 국내 외 관련 문헌을 분석 고찰하고 둘째, 문제중심학습에 관한 국내 외 관련 문헌을 분석 고찰하여 이를 근거로 공업계고등학교에 적용할 수 있는 문제중심학습에 의한 실기수업 모형을 구안하였다. 연구결과 첫째, 문제중심학습에 의한 실기수업은 학생들이 실생활의 비 구조화된 문제를 중심으로 이것을 해결하는 과정에서 학습이 이루어지도록 하는 수업 형태로 본 연구에서는 문제해결 과정, 즉 계획, 실행, 평가의 과정을 거쳐 학생이 문제를 해결해 가는 과정에서 학습이 이루어지도록 하는 학습자 중심의 수업 형태를 의미한다. 둘째, 문제중심학습에 의한 실기수업에서 교사는 문제의 설계, 문제해결을 촉진하는 질문과 언어적 개입이 요구되며, 힌트와 조력을 하는 코치 역할과 Think Aloud을 이용한 문제해결 과정에 대한 인지적 모델링 역할이 요구된다. 셋째, 공업계 고등학교에서 문제 중심 학습에 의한 실기수업은 학습동기 유발 및 자기 주도적 학습과 협동적 학습이 일어나도록 해야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강인애(1997). 왜 구성주의인가?. 서울: 문음사
  2. 강인애(2003). PBL의 이론과 실제. 문음사
  3. 권현진(2005). 기술 관련 전문가의 인식에 기초한 기술적 창조성 모형 개발. 충남대학교. 박사학위논문
  4. 교육인적자원부(2001). 고등학교 교육과정해설-공업에 관한 교과(상). 교육부 고시 제1997-15호
  5. 류창열(1993). 새로운 기술혁신에 따른 직업-기술계 교사에게 필요한 자질. 대한공업교육학회지, 18(1), 86-93
  6. 류창열(1999). 공업.기술교육원론. 교육과학사
  7. 류창열(2003). 기술교육원론. 충남대학교출판부
  8. 문대영(2001). 초.중등학교 학생의 적응자.혁신자 역할분담 문제해결활동이 기술적 창의력 계발에 미치는 효과. 충남대학교. 박사학위논문
  9. 박흥준(2003). 기술교과 건설기술단원의 문제 중심 학습이 학업성취와 정의적 특성에 미치는 효과. 서울대학교. 박사학위논문
  10. 여광응, 정용석(1997). THINK ALOUD. 도서출판 특수교육
  11. 오만록(1999). 구성주의에 근거한 문제 중심 학습(PBL)이 학업성취와 정의적 특성에 미치는 효과. 고려대학교. 박사학위논문
  12. 유병로(2001). 수정된 TAPPS 활동이 공업고등학교 학생의 전자회로 고장해결 능력에 미치는 효과. 충남대학교. 박사학위논문
  13. 이무근, 김재식, 김판욱(2001). 실기교육 방법론. 서울, 교육과학사
  14. 이재원(1984). 공업기술 교수법. 성안당
  15. 이좌택(2004). 문제기반학습에 터한 로봇 제어 프로그래밍 수업이 중학생의 논리적 사고력에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교. 박사학위논문
  16. 임선빈(1996). 문제해결 학습을 위한 수업설계의 기본방향. 교육문제연구, 8, 228-248, 서울: 고려대학교
  17. 장수웅(2002). 기술교육에서 창의적인 문제 해결 수업을 위한 수행평가 도구의 개발. 한국교원대학교. 박사학위논문
  18. 최유현(2005). 기술교과 교육학. 형설출판사
  19. 林 和夫(1995). 하이테크 시대의 기능교육. 김영종, 김정식, 노태천 공역(2004). 도서출판 인터비전
  20. 片桐重男(이용율 외 역) (1992). 문제해결 과정과 발문분석. 경문사
  21. Baker, G. E., & Dugger, J. C. (1986). Helping students develop problem solving skills. The technology teacher, 45(4), 10-13
  22. Barrows, H. S. (1994). Practice-Based Learning: Problem-Based Learning Applied to Medical Education. Springfield, II : Southern Illionois Univ School of Medicine
  23. Bransford, J. D. & Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL problem solver. SanFrancisco, CA: Freeman
  24. Burch, K. (1995). PBL and the Lively Classroom. University of Delaware. (On-Line). Available: http://udel.edu/pbl/cte
  25. Camp. B. W., & Bash, M, A. (1981). Think Aloud: Increasing social and cognitive skills - A problem solving program for children (Primary Level). Champaign, IL: Research Press
  26. Chandran. G. S. (1981). Approaches to laboratory instruction. Colombo plan staff college for technician education. Workshop for persons engaged in developmental work
  27. CPBL. (1998). An Introduction to Problem-Based Learning. (On-line). Available: http://www.imsa/edu
  28. DeLuca, V. W. (1991). Implementing Technology Education Problem-Solving Activities. Journal of Technology Education, 2(2)
  29. Department for Education(1995). Design and Technology in the National Curriculum (Key Stage 1), HMSO, London
  30. Dewey, J. (1910). How we Think New York: Free Press
  31. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivisim and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  32. Edward, L. & Martin, B. (2003). Keep on Moving! Entrepreneurship, Creativity, and. Effective Problem Solving. McGraw-Hill Primis as ISBN 0-07-284153-2
  33. Forgarty, R. (1997). Problem-based learning and other Curriculum Models for the Multiple Intelligences. Arlington Heights, IL: IRI/SkuLight Training and Publishing
  34. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Condition of Learning And Theory of Instruction(4thed). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  35. Glass, A. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1986). Cognition(2nded.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley
  36. W.Gregg(Ed.), Knowledge and cognition. Potomac, MD:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  37. Glass, A. R. (1992). The effects of thinking aloud pair problem solving on technology education students' thinking processes, procedures, and problem solutions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN
  38. Halfin, H. H. (1973). Technology: A process approach. (Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, 1973) Dissertation Abstracts International, 11(1), 1111A
  39. Harden, R M., & Davis, M. H. (1998). The continuum of problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 20(4), 318-322
  40. Harden, R M., & Davis, M. H. (1998). The continuum of problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 20(4), 318-322
  41. Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1974). Understanding written problem instructions. In L. W. Gregg(Ed.), Knowledge and cognition. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  42. Hennessy, S. & McCormick,R. (1994). The General Problem Solving Process in Technology Education-Myth or Reality? F.banks, Teaching Technology, Routledge, London
  43. Herschbach, D. R. (1995). Technology as Knowledge: Implications for Instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 31-42
  44. Hutchinson. J., & Karsnitz, L. (1994). Design and problem solving in technology. Albany, NY: Delmar Publisher
  45. ITEA(International Technology Education Association). (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. VA: Author
  46. Johnsey. R (1995). The Design Process-Does it Exit? (A critical Review of Published Models for the Design Process in England and Wales). International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5, 199-217 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00769904
  47. Johnson, S. D. and Thomas, R. (1992). Technology eduvation and the cognitive revolution, The Technology Teacher 51(4), 7-12
  48. Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 362-381 https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782391
  49. Kimbell, R. (1986). Design education: The foundation years. London, United Kingdom: Routlege & Kegan
  50. Kimbell, R. et al. (1994). Learning Through Design and Technology, in F. Banks, Teaching Technology, Routledge, London 1994, 59-67
  51. Leighbody, G.G. & Kidd, D. M. (1955). Methods of Teaching Ship and Technical Subjects. Delmar Publishers Inc.21-27
  52. Mathias J. Sutton. (2003). Problem Representation, Understanding, and Learning Transfer Implications for Technology Education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 40(4), 3-10
  53. McCade, J. (1990). Problem Solving: Much More Than Just Design. Journal of technology Education, 2(1), 3-12
  54. McCormick, R. (1990). The evolution of current practice in technology education. A paper presented at the NATO Advanced Research Workshop; Integrating Advanced Technology into Technology Education, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  55. Meichenbaum, D. H., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 77, 115-126 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030773
  56. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  57. Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to Learn. 연문희 역(1990). 학습의 자유-인간 중심교육. 도서출판 문음사
  58. Romiszowski, A.J.(1999). The development of physical skills: Instruction in the psychomotor domain. Instructional-design theories and models. Lawren Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  59. Sage, S. M. (1996). A Qualitative Examination of Problem-Based Learning at the ${\kappa}-8$ Level: Preliminary Findings(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398 263)
  60. Savage, E., & Sterry, L. (1990). A conceptual framework for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 50(1), 6-11
  61. SCAA(School Curriculum and Assessment Authority). (1994). Design and Technology in the National Curriculum-Draft Proposals, May 1994, SCAA/HMSO, London
  62. Schmidt, H. G. (1993). Foundations of Problem-Based Learning: some Explanatory Notes. Medical Education, 27, 422-432 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00296.x
  63. Todd, R., Toddy, K., & McCrory, D. (1996). Introduction to design and Technology. Cincinnati, OH: Thomson Learning Tools
  64. Torp & Sage. (1998). Problem as Possibilities; Problem based Learning for K-12 Education 1st Edition. Alexandria, Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  65. von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). Radical constructivism. London: Palmer Press. 김판수 외 (공역) (1999). 급진적 구성주의. 서울: 원미사
  66. Welch, M. (1996). The problem solving strategies of young designers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service NO. 401, 491)
  67. Yackel, E. B. (1984). Characteristics of problem representation indicative of understanding in mathematics problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
  68. Yi. S. (1996). Problem solving in technology education at the secondary level as perceived by technology educators in the United Kingdom and the United States. Published doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH