Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of Rating Factor for Main Components in Steel Cable-Stayed Bridges

강사장교 주요부재의 내하율 산정

  • 최동호 (한양대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 유훈 (한양대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 신재인 (한양대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 송원근 (한국시설안전기술공단)
  • Received : 2006.08.16
  • Published : 2006.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The paper proposes rating equations for main components such as girders, towers and cables in cable-stayed bridges. Load rating equations for girders and towers are proposed using stress and stability equations and load rating equation for cables is presented. A moving load analysis is performed and distribution types of live loads are determined for the cases of a maximum axial tensile force, a maximum axial compressive force, a maximum positive and a negative moment for each component. The Dolsan Grand bridge is used to verify a validity of proposed equations, The conventional rating equation overestimates rating factors of girders and towers in the Dolsan Grand bridge, whereas proposed rating equations properly reflect the axial-flexural interaction behavior of girders and towers in cable-stayed bridges.

본 논문에서는 사장교 주요부재인 거더와 주탑 및 케이블의 내하율을 평가하기 위한 식을 제안하였다. 응력 및 안정성 검토식을 이용하여 강사장교 거더와 주탑에 적용 가능한 내하율 산정식을 제안하였고 케이블의 내하율 산정식을 제안하였다. 영향선해석을 수행하여 사장교 각 부재에 인장력 최대, 압축력 최대 및 정/부 모멘트 최대의 경우에 활하중 재하 형태를 결정하였고 각 부재의 내하율 산정절차를 정리하였다. 제안된 내하율 산정방법의 타당성을 검증하기 위하여 실교량 모델인 돌산대교에 대한 적용예를 제시하였다. 일반교량의 내하율 산정방법은 돌산대교 거더와 주탑의 내하율을 과대 평가 하였으며, 제안된 내하율 산정방법은 축력과 모멘트를 동시에 지지하는 사장교 거더와 주탑의 거동을 적절히 반영하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 교량설계핵심기술연구단

References

  1. 건설교통부, "안전점검 및 정밀안전진단 세부지침," 2003.
  2. 건설교통부, "도로교 설계기준," 2005b.
  3. 최동호, 유훈, 하동현 "비탄성 좌굴해석을 통한 사장교 거더와 주탑의 안정성 검토," 대한토목학회 논문집, 제26호, 제6A호, 2005, pp. 1113-1125.
  4. 한국시설안전기술공단, "돌산대교 정밀안전진단보고서," 2001.
  5. AASHTO, "Manual for Condition Evaluation of Bridges," 1994.
  6. AASHTO, "Manual for Condition Evaluation and Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) of Highway Bridges," 2003.
  7. Barker, M. G. "Steel Girder Bridge Field Test Procedure," Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1999, pp. 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00013-6
  8. Cai, S. C. and Shahawy, M. "Understanding Capacity Rating of Bridges from Load Tests," Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2003, pp. 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2003)8:4(209)
  9. Chajes, M. J., Shenton, H. W. and O'Shea, D. "Use of Field Testing in Delaware's Bridge Management System," 8th International Bridge Management Conference, Denver, USA, Vol. 1, No. 498, 1999, pp. B-4.
  10. Fu, G., Pezze P. F. and Alampalli, S. "Diagnostic Load Testing for Bridge Load Rating," Transportation Research Record, No. 1594, 1997, pp. 125-133.
  11. Schulz, J. L., Commander, B., Goble, G. G. and Frangopol, M. "Efficient Field Testing and Load Rating of Short- and Medium-Span Bridges," Structural Engineering Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1995, pp. 181-194.
  12. Shenck, T. S., Laman, J. A. and Boothy, T. E. "Comparison of Experimental and Analytical Load-Rating Methodologies for a Pony-Truss Bridge," Transportation Research Record, No. 1688, 1999, pp. 68-75.
  13. Wang, P. H., Lin, H. T. and Tang, T. Y. "Study on Nonlinear Analysis of a Highly Redundant Cable-Stayed Bridge," Computers and Structures, Vol. 80, 200, pp. 165-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00166-3
  14. Shu, H. S. and Wang, Y. C. "Stability Analysis of Box-Girder Cable-Stayed Bridges," Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2001, pp. 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:1(63)