The Journal of the Society of Korean Medicine Diagnostics (대한한의진단학회지)
- Volume 10 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.78-97
- /
- 2006
- /
- 1226-5241(pISSN)
A Study on Method that Estimate Expertness of Pulse Diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine
8체질맥진(體質脈診) 숙연도(熟練度) 평가방법(評價方法)에 관(關)한 연구(硏究)
- Shin, Yong-Sup (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine,Interdisciplinary Programs,Kyung Hee University) ;
- Park, Young-Jae (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine,Interdisciplinary Programs,Kyung Hee University) ;
- Oh, Hwan-Sup (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine,Interdisciplinary Programs,Kyung Hee University) ;
- Park, Young-Bae (Dept. of Human Informatics of Oriental Medicine,Interdisciplinary Programs,Kyung Hee University)
- 신용섭 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과) ;
- 박영재 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과) ;
- 오환섭 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과) ;
- 박영배 (경희대학교 학과간협동과정 한방인체정보의학과)
- Published : 2006.07.31
Abstract
Background: There was seldom study about method that estimate expertness of pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine in spite of the diagnostician importance in 8 Constitution Medicine Objectives: This study is to evaluate diagnostician's consistency and accuracy about pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine using Cage R&R study. Methods: The subjects were comprised of 28 volunteers. Among theme, 3 diagnosticians and 10 participants were chosen through questionnaire. Diagnosticians diagnosed participant's Constitution by pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine with hiding their eyes by eyepatch. MINITAB statistical software(ver. 13.20) was used for statistical analysis: Attribute Cage R&R study was used to verify the results. Results: 1. In the measurements of consistency, diagnostician b(agreement=80%, Value of k=0.8276)was very good, diagnostician a(agreement=70%, Value of k=0.7465) was good, and diagnostician c(agreement=50%, Value of k=0.5365) was moderate. 2. In the measurements of accuracy, diagnostician b(agreement =70%, Value of t=0.6812) was good, diagnostician a(agreement=60%. Value of t=0.6414) was good, and diagno-stician c(agreement=0%, Value of k=-0.1000) was poor. 3. In cofidence of diagnosis, diagnostician c was 75%, diagnostician a was 70%, and diagnostician b was 64%. Conclusion: The results suggest that diagnostician's consistency and accuracy about pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine can be evaluated by Cage R&R study. further study is needed for estimation method of pulse diagnosis in 8 Constitution Medicine.