Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Faculty Status for Academic Librarians

대학사서의 교수지위에 관한 연구

  • 이숙희 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2005.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The pupose of the study is to define the concept of faculty librarian system and provide suggestions in developing the system as a professional mode suitable for academic librarianship. The background and development of the system were reviewed and the advantages and disadvantages of faculty librarian system were addressed along with the investigations of the current status of professor librarians in USA. Key issues related to a rank system. qualification. evaluation and education of faculty librarian were discussed in the light of implementing and promoting this system in domestic university libraries.

이 연구의 목적은 지식정보사회가 요구하는 전문사서직의 한 유형으로서 교수사서제의 의의와 적용의 문제 그리고 그 발전 요소들을 논의하는데 있다. 대학사서에게 교수지위를 부여하게 된 배경과 발전과정을 개관하고, 현재 교수지위를 부여하고 있는 미국의 현황을 중심으로 교수사서제가 대학도서관의 발전에 미치는 긍정적, 부정적 영향을 고찰하였다. 마지막으로 대학도서관의 교수사서제가 적용, 발전되기 위해서 검토되어야 할 문제점들을 교수사서의 직위체계, 자격, 평가 그리고 교육의 측면에서 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김창섭. 1999. 대학도서관 사서의 자격 및 역할에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 성균관대학교 행정대학원
  2. 신선옥. 1996. 대학도서관 이용을 위한 서지교육에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 전주대학교 대학원
  3. 이병목 역. 1992a. 대학도서관을 위한 교수신분지침. '도서관문화', 33(1): 31-32
  4. 이병목 역. 1992b. 대학사서를 위한 교수신분기준. '도서관문화', 33(6): 37-39
  5. 임동빈. 2001. 사서직의 전문성 제고를 위한 계속교육 발전방안에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 상명대학교 대학원
  6. 정현태. 1997. 사립대학 사서직원의 인사관리. '도서관문화', 38(1): 20-34
  7. 최정태. 1978. 사서의 사회적 지위: 특히 대학도서관을 중심으로. '국회도서관보', 15(4): 18-22
  8. 한국사립대학교도서관협의회. 회원교 편람. [cited.2005.2.3].
  9. 한상완. 1993. 대학도서관의 이상과 현실. '대학교육', 65(6): 10-18
  10. ACRL. 1974. 'ACRL Standards for 대학사서의 교수지위에 관한 연구 101 Faculty Status for College and Unviersity Librarians.' College and Research Libraries News, 35(5): 112-113
  11. ACRL. 1992. 'ACRL Standards for Faculty Status for College and Unviersity Librarians.' College & Rsearch Libraries News, 53(5): 317-318
  12. ACRL. 2002. 'ACRL Guidelines for Academic Status for College and University Libraries.' [cited2005.1.30].
  13. ACRL. 2001. 'ACRL Standards for Faculty Status for College and Unviersity Librarians.' [cited2005.1.25].
  14. ACRL. 1987. 'ACRL Model Statement of Criteria and Procedures for Appointment, Promotion in academic Rank, and Tenure for College and University Librarians.' [cited2005.1.30].
  15. ACRL, AAC, AAUP. 2002. 'ACRL Joint Statement on Faculty Status of College and University Librarians.' [cited2005.1.30].
  16. ACRL Task Force on Institutional Priorities and Faculty Rewards. 1998. 'Academic Librarianship and the Redefining Scholarship Project.' [cited2005.1.25].
  17. ACRL. 1981. 'Academic Status Survey.' College & Research Libraries News, 12(6): 171
  18. Applegate, R. 1993. 'Deconsturcting Faculty Status: Research and Assumptions.' Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19(3): 158-164 https://doi.org/10.1016/0099-1333(93)90518-A
  19. Bechtel, J. M. 1985. 'Acacemic Professional Status: An Alternative for Librarians.' Jornal of Academic Librarianship, 11(5): 289-292
  20. Benedict, M. A., J. A. Gavaryck, and H. C. Selvin. 1983. 'Status of Academic Librarians in New York State.' College & Research Libraries, 44(1): 12-19 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_44_01_12
  21. Bloch, E. et al. 1977. Librarians and Academic Status: A Position Paper. [ED144585]
  22. Boyer, E. L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, N.J.: Carnegie foundation fo the Advancement of Teaching
  23. Cary, S. 2001. 'Faculty Rank, Status, and Tenure for Librarians: Current Trends.' College & Research Libraries News, 62(5): 510-511, 520
  24. Cronin, B. 2001. 'The Mother of All Myths.' Library Journal, 126(3): 144
  25. Crowley, B. 1996. 'Redefining the Status of the Librarian in Higher Education.' College & Research Libraries, 57(2): 113-121 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_57_02_113
  26. DeBoer, K. and W. Culotta. 1987. 'The Academic Librarian and Faculty Status in the 1980s: A Survey of the Literature.' College & Research Libraries, 48(3): 215-223 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_48_03_215
  27. DePew, J. N. 1983. 'The ACRL Standards for Faculty Status: Panacea or Placebo?' College & Research Libraries, 44(6): 407-413 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_44_06_407
  28. Douglas, G. V. 1999. 'Professor Librarian: A Model of the Teaching Librarian of the Future.' Computers in Libraries 19(10): 24-28
  29. Hart, R. L. 1999. 'Scholarly Publication by University Librarians: A Study at Penn State.' College & Research Libraries, 60(5): 454-462 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.5.454
  30. Hersberger, R. M. 1989. 'The Challenges of Leading and Managing Faculty Status Librarians.' Journal of Academic Librarianship, 14(6): 361- 365
  31. Hill, F. E. and R. Hauptman. 1986. 'A New Perspective on Faculty Status.' College & Research Libraries, 47(2): 156-159 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_47_02_156
  32. Hoggan, D. B. 2003. 'Faculty Status for Librarians in Higher Education.' portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(3): 431-445 https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0060
  33. Horenstein, B. 1993. 'Job Satisfaction of Academic Librarians: An Examination of the Relationships Between Satisfaction, Faculty Status, and Participation.' College & Research Libraries, 54(3): 255-269 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_54_03_255
  34. Lowry, C. B. 1993. 'The Status of Faculty Status for Academic Librarians: A Twenty-year Perspective.' College & Research Libraries, 54(2): 163-172 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_54_02_163
  35. Martin, S. K. 1993. 'Raising Our Professional Expectations With a Two-Track Approach to Librarianship.' Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19(1): 24 https://doi.org/10.1016/0099-1333(93)90695-2
  36. Mitchell, W. B. and M. Reichel. 1999. 'Publish or Perish: A Dilemma for Academic Librarians?' College & Research Libraries, 60(3): 232-243 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.3.232
  37. Mitchell, W. B. and B. Morton. 1992. 'On Becoming Faculty Librarians: Acculturation Problems and Remedies.' College & Research Libraries, 53(5): 379-392 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_53_05_379
  38. Mitchell W. B. and L. S. Swieszkowski. 1985. 'Publication Requirements and Tenure Appoval Rates: An Issue for Academic Librarians.' College & Research Libraries, 46(3): 239-255
  39. Montanelli, D. S. and P. F. Stenstrom. 1986. 'The Benefits of Research for Academic Librarians and the Institutions They Serve.' College & Research Libraries, 47(5): 482- 485 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_47_05_482
  40. Park, B. and R. Riggs. 1991. 'Status of the Profession: A 1989 National Survey of Tenure and Promotion Policies for Academic Librarians.' College & Research Libraries, 52(3): 275-289 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_52_03_275
  41. Reber, J. L. 1997. Professional or Academic Status for Academic Librarians: A Survey of Faculty and Staff in Three Ohio Universities. A Master's Research Paper, Kent State University School of Library Science
  42. Ruess, D. E. 2004. 'Faculty and Professional Appointments of Academic Librarians: Expanding the Options for Choice.' portal: Libraries and the Academy, 4(1): 75-84 https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0022
  43. Shapiro, B. J. 1993. 'The Myths Surrounding Faculty Status for Librarians.' College & Research Libraries News, 54(10): 562-563
  44. White, H. S. 1996. 'Faculty Status for Academic Librarians: the Search for the Holy Grail.' Library Journal, 121(19): 39-40

Cited by

  1. An Ethnographic Study of Factors Contributing to the Occupational Socialization of Librarians vol.43, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.381