Journal of Family Resource Management and Policy Review (가족자원경영과 정책)
- Volume 9 Issue 1
- /
- Pages.95-111
- /
- 2005
- /
- 1738-0391(pISSN)
- /
- 2713-9662(eISSN)
Evaluation of consumer life by consumers' purchase behavior style
소비자의 구매행동유형에 따른 소비생활평가
- Huh Kyungok (Dept. of Family Culture and Consumer Science Sungshin Women's University)
- 허경옥 (성신여자대학교 가족문화소비자학과)
- Published : 2005.02.01
Abstract
This study utilized representative data and categorized consumer groups by the style of purchase behavior, and examined the differences in consumers' evaluation for their consumption life and socio-demographic variables. The results of this study are summarized below First, the level of satisfaction for consumption life and evaluation of consumption level were in medium. The evaluation for society's consumption behavior was negative and did not agree that consumers' own behaviors are rational, but others' are conspicuous. The trend of consumers' conspicuous behavior and fashion-focused behavior were severe, but consumers' rationality was low. Second, males were more likely to be in rationality, but females were in both rationality and fashion-focused behaviors. Single consumers were more likely to follow fashion-based behavior, but married consumers prefer name-brand products and more likely to show conspicuous consumption. Low education was more related with convenience-focused behavior and rationality, but high education was more related with fashion-focused behavior and irrationality. Young consumers were more likely to show fashion-focused behavior, but old consumers follow convenience-focused behavior. Third, the level of satisfaction for consumption life was the highest in rational consumers, but low in consumers focused on name-brand products and on conspicuous consumption. The evaluation of consumption level was low in rational consumers and consumers focused on convenience, but high in consumers focused on name-brand products and on fashion. Rational consumers were more likely to evaluate society's consumption behavior negatively, and consumers focused on convenience were more likely to disagree for the discrepance in the evaluation of consumption behavior between consumers themselves and others.