한국작물학회지 (KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE)

  • 제50권1호
  • /
  • Pages.28-31
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 0252-9777(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-8432(eISSN)
한국작물학회 (The Korean Society of Crop Science)
권호 표지

Change in Photosynthesis, Proline Content, and Osmotic Potential of Corn Seedling under High-Saline Condition

  • Yoon Byeong Sung (College of Agriculture & Life Sci., Kangwon Natl. University) ;
  • Jin Chengwn (College of Agriculture & Life Sci., Kangwon Natl. University) ;
  • Park Sang Un (Biology Research Center for Industrial Accelerators(BRCIA), Dongshin University) ;
  • Cho Dong Ha (College of Agriculture & Life Sci., Kangwon Natl. University)
  • 발행 : 2005.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

To identify salt-tolerance characteristics of corn seedling was treated in solution of 0, 50 and 100 mM NaCl of hydroponic cultivation. In photosynthesis of corn seedling, there was no large difference between 50mM and 0 mM NaCl solution, however, in 100 mM NaCl solution, the tolerance gradually decreased to $76\%,\;49\%,\;and\;31\%$ after one day, four days, and seven days, respectively, in comparison to 0 mM NaCl solution. Osmotic potential of corn in seedling period was significantly decreased with increasing saline level, however, free proline content in the plant on the ground was significantly increased with increasing saline level and with the lapse of time. In terms of correlation among major characteristics, there was a highly significant positive difference between osmotic pressure potential and photosynthesis, However, highly negative correlation was found between osmotic pressure potential and free proline content. In addition, it was expected that young seedling of corn with saline tolerance may be utilized in the transplantation in salt-accumulated land. Based on above-shown result, in terms of saline tolerance of Chalok-2 variety, growth suppression was serious with 100mM NaCl solution. However, growth was expected that seedling growth would be favorable under 50 mM NaCl solution.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abou-Hadld, A. F. 1992 Protected cultivation for tomato under salt affected soils. Acta Hort. 323 . 443-449
  2. Bahbrea, in E., E. Cayuela, F Arets, and F. Perz-Alfocea 1997. Salinity effects on some postharvest quality factors in a commercial tomato hybrid. J Hort. Sci. 72 : 885-892
  3. Beatriz, G, Neves-Piestun, and Nint Bernsten. 2001. Salinity-induced inhibition of leaf elongation in maize is not mediated by changes in cell wall acidification capacity. Plant Physiol. 125: 1419-1428 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.125.3.1419
  4. Bethke, P C and M. C. Drwe. 1992 Stornatal and nonstornatal components to inhibition of photosynthetic in leaves of Capsicum annuum during progressive exposure to NaCl salinity. Plant Physiol 99. 219-226 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.1.219
  5. Cho, J. W. and C S. Kim. 1998 Effect of NaCl concentration on photosynthesis and mineral content of barley seedlings under solution culture. Korean J. Crop Sci. 43(3) . 152-156
  6. Cho, J. W., C. S. Kim, and J D. So. 2002. Effect of NaCl stress on inorgain ion, L-proline, sugar and starch content of soybean seedlings. Korean J. Crop Sci 47(2). 75-79
  7. Choi, W Y, J. H. Park, and Y W. Kwon 1997. Physiological responses of barley to salt stress at reproductive stage. Korean J. Crop Sci 42(6) . 687-692
  8. Evlagon, D., I Ravina, and P M. Neumann 1992 Effects of Salinity stress and calcium on hydraulic conductivity and growth in maize seedling roots. J. Plant Nutr. 15 . 795-803 https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169209364363
  9. Frensch, J. and T C. Hsiao 1994. Transient responses of cell turgor and growth of maize roots as affected by changes in water potential, Plant Physiol. 104 : 247-254 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.1.247
  10. Hanson, A D, C. E. in Nalsen, A. R. Pedersen, and E H. Everson. 1979. Capacity for porline accumulation during water stress in barley and its implication for drought resistance. Crop Sci. 19 : 489-493 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1979.0011183X001900040015x
  11. Heuer, B. and A. Nadler. 1998 Physiological response of potato plants to soil salinity and water deficit. Plant Sci. 137 . 43-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00133-2
  12. Huber, W., P. N. Rustagl, and N Sankhia 1974 Effect of sodium chloride and gibbereline on the activity of the enzyme of carbohydrate metabolism in leaves of pennisetum typhoides Eco-physiologlcal studies on indian and zone pIants. Bot. 77-84
  13. James, R. D and in L BinzeI 1996. NaCI reduces indol-3-acetic acid levels in the roots of tomato plants independent of stress-induced abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 112 . 379-384 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.1.379
  14. Katsuhiro, W, H. Tadashi, and I Kuni. 1996. Analysis of photosynthesis depression under low leaf water potential by comparison of $CO_2$ exchange and $O_2$ evolution rates. J J Crop Sci. 65(4) : 590-598 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.65.590
  15. Lee, K. S., J. S. Lee, and S. Y. Choi. 1992. Changes in contents of chlorophyll and free proline as affected by NaCl in rice seedling. Korean J Crop Sci. 37(2) . 178-184
  16. Lee, S G, J. S. Shin, Y S Seo, and G K. Bae. 1998 Effects of salt stress on photosynthesis free proline content in tobacco. Korean J Environmental Agriculture. 17(3) : 215-219
  17. Lee, S. Y and C S Kim. 1995. Cellular structural change of barley seedling on different salt concentration under hydroponic culture. Korean J. Crop Sci. 40 . 481-486
  18. Lee, S. Y., C. S Kim, J. W. Cho, and Y. G. Kang 1996. Physiological response of barley seedlings to salt stress. Korean J. Crop Sci 41: 665-671
  19. Lutts, S, J M. Kinet, and J. Bouharmont 1995 Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in salinity resistance. J. Exper Bot. 46(293) . 1843-1852 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/46.12.1843
  20. Marschner. H 1986. Mineral nutrition in higher plants. Academic Press Inc Ltd. London PP.674
  21. McNulty, I. B 1985. Rapid osmotic adjustment by a succulent halophyte to saline shock. Plant Physiol 78: 100-103 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.78.1.100
  22. Megel, K and E. A Kirkby. 1978 'In principles of Plant Nutrition' Internation Potash Institute Switzerland.193-210
  23. Mohamrnad, P 1994. Handbook of plant and crop stress Marcel Dekker press. New York p. 235-250
  24. Neumann, P. M, H. Azaizeh, and D. Leon. 1994. Hardening of roots cell walls; a growth inhibitory response to salinity stress, Plant Cell Environ. 16 15-24
  25. Shalhevet, J., M. G. Huck, and B P Shroeder 1995. Root and shoot growth responses to salinity in maize and soybean. Agron. J. 87 . 512-516 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700030019x
  26. Troll, W. and J. Linsdley. 1955 A photometric method for the determination of proline. J. BioI Chem. 215 : 655-660
  27. Volkmar, K M., Y Hu, and H Steppuhn. 1998 Physiological response of plant to salinity. A review, Can. J. Plant Sci. 78 . 19-27 https://doi.org/10.4141/P97-020
  28. Xiaomu, Niu, A. B. Ray, M. H. Paul, and M. P Jose. 1995 Ion homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiol.109 : 735-742 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.3.735
  29. Xu, H. L., L. Gauthier, and A. Gosselin. 1994 Photosynthetic responses of greenhouse tomato plants to high solution electrical conductivity and low soil water content. J. Hortic. Sci. 69 821-832 https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1994.11516518
  30. Zidan, I. H Azaizeh, and P. M. Neurnanu. 1990. Does salinity reduce growth in maize root epiderrnal cells by inhibiting their capacity for cell wall acidification? Plant Physiol. 93 : 7-11 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.93.1.7