Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Alternative Environmental Assessment System in KOREA : Applying New Conceptual Model(APEMI IA MODEL) into Impact Assessment for Better Integrated Decision-Making

대안적 환경평가 시스템 연구: 통합적 의사결정을 위한 새로운 개념의 영향평가모형(APEMI IA MODEL)의 국내 적용방안 탐색

  • Kim, Im Soon (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Han, Sang Wook (Kwangwoon Strategic Environmental Assessment Institute(KWSEAI))
  • 김임순 (광운대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 한상욱 (광운전략환경평가연구소)
  • Received : 2005.06.09
  • Accepted : 2005.07.25
  • Published : 2005.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the world's attention turns to sustainability and the considerations of cumulative effects, the concept of Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA) has become more significant and urgent and increasing number of countries and international organizations now undertake some forms of SEA. The term SEA, however, is variously defined and understood; generally it means a formal process of systematic analysis of the environmental effects on development policies, plans, programmes and other proposed strategic actions. This process extends the aims and principles of EIA upstream in the decision-making process, beyond the project level in which major alternatives are still open. There is a shift toward more integrative approaches and greater use of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) as sustainability tools in cooperation with Environmental Management System (EMS). Currently, Korea has EIA system and Prior Environmental Review System (PERS) which is different type of SEA as Environment Assessment (EA) system. APEMI IA MODEL integrated following three pillar(refer to attached figure.1) ; First pillar symbolized decision making cycle with planning process. Second pillar symbolized integrated assessment which tying SEA and EIA with specific impacts assessment(eg: social impact assessment, economic impact assessment, health impact assessment etc) in cooperation with EMS. Third pillar symbolized EA best practical procedure of International Association for Impact Assessment(IAIA). Considering the above, we applied new conceptual model(APEMI IA MODEL) into Impact Assessment for better integrated decision-making in KOREA as an alternative IA system(IS IA MODEL A and B refer to attached figure 4, 5).

Keywords

References

  1. 감사원, 2003, 경인운하건설사업 추진실태, 1-6
  2. 건설교통부, 2005, 국토업무편람, 289-293
  3. 국무조정실, 2004, 국책사업타당성 조사제도개선방안, 1-12
  4. 김은식, 한상욱, 2001, 국책개발사업(새만금 간척사업개발)과 환경영향평가 : 공공사업 추진절차의 재정립과 전략환경평가 제도 도입, 한국환경영향평가학회 학술대회 발표 자료집, 3-24
  5. 김임순외, 2004a, 전략환경평가를 통한환경영향 평가의 개선방안에 관한 연구: 대안적 환경 평가 모형 APEMI IA MODEL의 제안, 환경정책 12(2), 81-110
  6. 김임순 외, 2004b , 전략환경평가를 통한 환경영향 평가의 개선방안에 관한 연구 보건영향평가 제도 도입을 통한 보건과 환경의 통합적 접근, 대한위생학회 19(4), 34-47
  7. 서원상, 2004, 지속적 개발의 '지속성' 개념에 관한 법학적 접근, 환경정책연구 3(2) 통권5호, 82-83
  8. 정연만, 2003, 환경영향평가제도의 발전방향, 한국영향평가학회 2003년 추계학술 발표회 자료집, 39-46
  9. 한국개발연구원, 1999, 예비타당성 조사수행을 위한 일반지침 연구, 1-22
  10. 한상욱, 1999, 지속가능한 개발과 전략환경평가, 지속가능개발위원회설치 운영에 관한 토론회, 서울특별시녹색 서울시민위원회
  11. 한상욱, 2003, 전략적 환경평가 -현재와 미래-, 2003년도 한국환경정책학회 정기총회 및 학술대회자료집, 9-49
  12. 한상욱, 2004, 새로운 환경평가 패러다임과 우리의 대응, 2004년도 한국 환경영향평가학회 추계학술발표회자료집
  13. 환경부홈페이지, www.me.go.kr
  14. Annie Donnelly 1998, A Directory of Impact Assessment Guidelines, International Institute for Environmental and Development. 31-42
  15. Barry Dalal-Clayton and Barry Sadler, 2004, The Status and Potential of Strategic Environmental Assessment, 1-112
  16. Barry Sadler, 1997, International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Final Report Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance, CEAA, IAIA, 1996, 139-182
  17. Bjorn Lomborg, 2004, Global Crises, Global Solutions, Cambridge University Press. 129-150
  18. Boelie Elzen Frank W. Geels Ken Green, 2004. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability Theory, Evidence and Policy, 1-47
  19. Christopher Wood, 1995, Environmental Impact Assessment A Comparative Review. LONGMAM. 266-288
  20. CSIR, 2000, Strategic Environmental Assessment in South Africa. 1-36
  21. EC, 2003a, Commissions Guidance on the Implementation of Directive 2001/42/EC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain and Plans and Programmes on the Environment, 1-63
  22. EC, 2003b, How successful are the Member States in implementing the EIA Directive, Adoption of the 5 Years Report on the application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive(Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directive 97/11/EC)
  23. EnvironmentCanada, 2003, Strategic Environmental Assessment at Environment Canada
  24. Fondawione Enrico Mattei, 2002, Toward An Analytical Strategic Environmental Assessment-ANSEA Towards Better Decision-Making New Concepts in Strategic Environmental Assessment
  25. IAIA, 1999, Principes of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice, 1-4
  26. IAIA, 2002a, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Performance Criteria, Special Publication 1, 1
  27. IAIA, 2002b, The Linkages Between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendations for Actions, 1-12
  28. ICON, 2001, SEA and International of the Environment into Strategic Decision Making Final Report, 1
  29. Larry Canter, Barry Sadler, 1997, A Tool kit for effective eia practice-Review of Methods and Perspectives on their Application. IAIA. 5-40
  30. Lawrence B. Cahill, 2001, Environmental Health and Safety Audits 8th Edition, Government Institutes Rockville, Maryland. 89-127
  31. L. J. Walker and J Johnston, 1999, Guidelines for the Assessment of Indirect and Cumulative Impacts as well as Impact Interactions, Hyder, 2-14
  32. Ministry of the Environment, Japan, 2003, Effective SEA System and Case Studies, 2-37
  33. The Government of the HongKong, 2004, HongKong Strategic Environmental Assesment Manual, 25-66
  34. The NEPA TASK FORCE, 2003, Modernizing NEPA Implementationon the Council on Environmental Quality, Executive office of president of the United States, 7-18
  35. UN, 2005, UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Sustainable Development http://www.un.org/esa/ sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/isd.htm
  36. UNDP, 2003, Benefits of a Strategic Environmental Assessment, 1-5
  37. UNEP, 2002, EIA Training Resource Manual, 410-545
  38. UNEP, 2004, Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach, 1-147
  39. U.S. CEQ, 1997, 'The National Environmental Policy Act: A Study of Its Effectiveness After Twenty Five Years, 1-47
  40. U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, 2001, Report and Recommendation on a NEPA Pilot Project Initiative, 1-10
  41. U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, 2004, Final Report Online Dialogue on Conflict Situation Assessment, 5-9
  42. WHO (2001), Health Impact Assessment in Development Policy and Planing, Report of an Informal WHO Consultative Meeting, Cartagena, Colombia 28 May, 2001, 5-23
  43. WHO, 2002, The World Summit on Sustainable Development Report by the Secretariat, Fifty-Fifth World Health Assembly Provisional Agenda Item 13.3
  44. World Bank, 2002, Strategic Environmental Assessment in world Bank Operations; Experience to Date-Future Potential, 1-51