Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Retrospective Study of Success Rate of the $XiVE^{(R)}$ Implant;Early evaluation of clinical performance

($XiVE^{(R)}$ 임프란트의 성공률에 관한 후향적 연구;임상성적에 관한 조기평가

  • Park, Jin-Woo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 박진우 (경북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluates the clinical performance of the recently introduced $XiVE^{(R)}$ implant(Dentsply-Friadent) with a new macro-design to improve primary stability. A total of 208 $XiVE^{(R)}$ implants (101 in the maxilla and 107 in the mandible) were placed in 71 patients. The average age of the patients was 49 years. Of the 208 implants, 190 (91.3%) were posterior implants and 82 (39.4%) were placed in compromised sites (grafted sites). Clinical and radiographic evaluation were made at second stage surgery for exposure and after functional loading. 192 implants in 64 patients were evaluated at exposure and 146 implants in 50 patients were loaded (average 170 days-loading) and evaluated after functional loading. Of 192 implants available for evaluation before loading, 3 implants failed (early failure) ; 1 before exposure, 1 at exposure and 1 during prosthetic procedure. 2 implants were in the maxilla and 1 was in the mandible. The success rate before loading was 98.4%. After functional loading, no implant failure was occurred in 146 implants evaluated during this period (100% interval success rate). This preliminary data with a new implant showed excellent success rate although the majority of implants evaluated in this study were placed in the posterior region of the jaw and compromised sites.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark P-I, Adell R, Breine D, et al, Intraosseous anchorage of dental prosthesis. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  2. Branemark P-I. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  3. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants : The Toronto study. Part I : Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-457 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90237-7
  4. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, et al, Osseointegrated implantsfor single-tooth replacement : A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-455
  5. Zarb GA. A prosthodontist's perception of osseointegration. In: Worthington P, Branemark P-I(eds). Adavanced Osseointegration Surgery. Application in the maxillofacial region : Quintessence 1992:13
  6. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm D, Branemark P-I & Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the totally edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359
  7. Friberg B, Nilson H, Olsson M & Palmquist C. MK II : the self-tapping Branemark implant. 5year result of a prospective 3-center study. Clin Oral Implant Res 1997;8:279-285 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080405.x
  8. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone : A 5 year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  9. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R & Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-432 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  10. Jemt T. Failure and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws. A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276
  11. Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Monis HF & Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55(Suppl. 5):38-45
  12. Sennerby L, Thomsen P & Ericson L. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71
  13. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L & Lekholm U. Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:120-127 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070205.x
  14. Ivanoff C-J, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U & Branemark P-I. Influence of bicortical or monocortical anchorage on maxillary implant stability. A 15-year retrospectiv study of Branemark system implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:103-110
  15. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compen Contin Educ Dent 1994;15:152-160
  16. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL & Buser D. Bone response to loaded and unloaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface, a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40: 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q
  17. Cochran DL. A comparision of endosseous dental implant surfaces: state of the art review. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523
  18. Deporter DA, Todescan R, Watson PA, et al, Use of the endopore dental implant to restore single teeth in the maxilla : protocol and early results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:263-272
  19. Callen DP, Hahn J, Hebel K, et al, Retospective multicenter study of an anodized, tapered, diminishing thread implant : success rate at exposure. Implant Dent 2000;9:329-336 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009040-00008
  20. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Reconstrutive Dent 2000;20:476-485
  21. Rosenquist JB, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets : Implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1996;11:205-209
  22. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U. Thomsen p. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I) Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-551 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
  23. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25
  24. Buchs AU, Hahn J, Vassos DM. Interim clinical study report: A threaded, hydroxyapatite-coated implant-five-year post-restoration safety and efficacy. Oral Implantol 1995;21:266-274
  25. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  26. Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD, et al, Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production and differentiation depends upon the state of cell maturation J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:145-155 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199602)30:2<145::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-R
  27. DeLeonardis D, Garg AK, Pecora GE. Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants : 5-year follow-up of 100 minimatic implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;14:384-391
  28. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture desing and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  29. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Celletti R, et al. Osseotite implant : 3-year prospective multicenter evaluation. Clin Impl Dent & Relat Res 2001;3:111-118 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00239.x
  30. Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of smoking on 3-year clinical success of osseointe-grated dental implants Ann Periodontol 2000;5:79-89 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.79
  31. Gorman LM, Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. The effect of smoking on implant survival at second-stage surgery : DICRG Interim Report No.5 Dental Implant Clinical Research Group. Implant Dent 1994;3:165-168
  32. Echert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-platform MK II implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:208-216
  33. Cavicchia F, Bravi F & Petrelli G. Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. Int J Perio Rest Dentistry 2001;5:475-485
  34. Toffler M. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation : a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:266-273
  35. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al, The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched(SLA) surface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  36. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Collins TA & Krogh PH. The reverse-torque test : a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:179-185