Journal of Plant Biotechnology

The Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology (한국식물생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Agronomic Characteristics of Transgenic Japonica Rice 'Milyang 204' with Herbicide Resistance Gene (bar)

형질전환 제초제저항성 벼 밀양 204호의 농업적 특성

  • Jeong Eung-Gi (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Yi Gi-Hwan (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Won Yong-Jea (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Park Hyang-Mi (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Cheon Nam-Soo (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Choi Jun-Ho (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Ku Yeon-Chung (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Han Chang-Deok (Division of Applied Life science, Plant Molecular Biology & Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Eun Mu-Yeong (National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, RDA) ;
  • Kim Tae-Sas (National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, RDA) ;
  • Nam Min-Hee (Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA)
  • Published : 2005.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigated the major characteristics of genetically modified rice of 'Milyang 204' originated from Dongjinbyeo compared to a non-transgenic rice varieties Dongjinbyeo and Jun-ambyeo. Basta resistant transgenic rice lines carrying bar gene produced by the Yeongnam Agricultural Research Institute were evaluated for their agronomic characters. The transgenic Japonica rice of 'Milyang 204' showed inferior phenotypic traits compared to a non-transgenic rice variety Dongjinbyeo and Junambyeo. On the basis of UPOV (Union Internationale Pour la Protaection des Obtentions Vegetables) and NSMO(National Seed Management Office) the transgenic 'Milyang 204' showed difference in some traits out of some agronomic traits, such as leaf color, angle of flag leaf, number of spikelets, culm length, white core and white belly compared to the non-transgenic varieties rice.

밀양 204호는 작물과학원 영남농업연구소 생명공학연구팀이 직파적응 제초제저항성 벼 품종을 육성할 목적으로 '98년 bar 유전자를 동진벼에 아그로박테리움법으로 형질 전환하여 제초제저항성 벼를 양성하였다. '98/'99년 동계에 단간 내도복 양질인 주남벼를 인공교배하여 약배양 등 육종프로그램에 적용하여 우량계통을 선발하고 밀양 204호로 계통명을 부여하였다. GM 벼와 Non-GM 벼의 농업적 특성을 UPOV 및 국립종자관리소의 품종등록 기준에 따른 농업적특성 중 차이가 있었던 것은 엽색도, 지엽의 형태, 간장, 수당립수 등 이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brar DS, Cohen SA, Vick CL, Johnson GW (1994) Recovery of transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea) plant from elite cultivars utilizing ACCELL technology. Plant J 5: 745-753 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.1994.00745.x
  2. Comai L, Hiatt WR, Huang LJ, Rose R, Thompson G, Stalker D (1985) Introduction and expression in plants of a glyphosate resistant aroA gene isolated from Salmonella typhimurium. NATO (USA) 83: 479-487
  3. Cohan SN, Chang ACY, Boyer HW, Helling RB (1973) Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasm ids in vitro. National Acad Sci 70: 3240-3244 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.70.11.3240
  4. Datta SK, Datta K, Soltanifar N, Donn G, Potrykus I (1992) Herbicide- resistant indica rice plants from IRRI breeding line 72 after PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts. Plant Mol Biol 20: 619-629 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046447
  5. Dunwell JM, Paul EM (1990) Impact of genetically modified crops in agriculture. Outlook Agric 19: 103-109 https://doi.org/10.1177/003072709001900207
  6. Eliseu S, Figueiredo LFA, Monte-neshich DC (1994) Transformation of potato (Solanum tuberosum cv Mantiqueira) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and evaluation of herbicide resistance. Plant Cell Rep 13: 666-670
  7. Fillatti JJ, Kiser J, Rose R, Comai L (1987) Efficient transfer of a glyphosate tolerance gene into tomato using a binary Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector. Bio-technol 5: 726-730 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0787-726
  8. James C (2004) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crop. ISAAA Briefs No 32. pp 12
  9. Juliano BO (1971) A Simplified assay for milled rice amylose. Cereal Sci Today 16: 334-338
  10. Kim SH (2002) A trend of GMO related patent registration in Korea. Curr trend of Health Indus Develop 14: 67-71
  11. Korea Crop Protection Association (2002) Agrochemicals use guide book. pp 911
  12. Lam E (1990) From footprint to function: an approach to study gene expression and egulatory factors in transgenic plants. In: Setlow JK (ed) Genetic engineering: Principles and methods 12. Plenum Press, New York, pp 73-86
  13. Little RR, Hilder GB, Dawson EH (1958) Differencial effect of dilute alkali on 25 varieties of milled rice. Cereal Chem 35: 111-126
  14. Nehra NS, Chobbar RN, Leung N, Caswell K, Mallard C, Steinhauer L, Baga M, Kartha KK (1994) Self-fertile transgenic wheat plants regenerated from isolated scutellar tissues following microprojectile bombardment with two distinct gene constructs. Plant J 5: 285-297 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.05020285.x
  15. Rural Development Administration 2000. Agricultural Experimental Guidelines, Version 3. Rural Development Administration, Suwon, Korea. pp 487-490
  16. Oard JH, Linscombe SD, Braverman MP, Jodari F, Blouin DC, Leech M, Kohli A, Vain P, Cooley JC, Christou P (1996) Development, field evaluation and agronomic performance of transgenic herbicide resistant rice. Mol Breed 2: 359-368 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437914
  17. Schuh W, Nelson MR, Bigelow DM, Orum TV, Orth CE, Lynch PT, Eyles PS, Blackhall NW, Jones J, Cocking EC, Davey MR (1993) The phenotypic characterization of R2 generation transgenic rice plants under field conditions. Plant Sci 89: 69-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(93)90171-U
  18. Won YJ, Yi GH, Cho JH, Ko JM, Park HM, Han CD, Yang SJ, Kim SC, Nam MH (2004) Establishment of a new breeding scheme for rapid release of variety using bar gene transformed rice. Kor J Plant Biotechnol 31: 7-11 https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2004.31.1.007
  19. Yang CI, Yang SJ, Jeong YP, Choi HC, Shin YB (2001) Genotype x environment interaction of rice yield in multi-location traits. Kor J Crop Sci 46: 453-458

Cited by

  1. Difference in Physiological Responses to Environmental Stress in Protox Inhibitor Herbicide-Resistant Transgenic Rice and Non-transgenic Rice vol.32, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2012.32.1.35
  2. Differences in Rice Quality and Physiochemical Component between Protox Inhibitor-Herbicide Resistant Transgenic Rice and Its Non-transgenic Counterpart vol.32, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2012.32.1.25
  3. Levels of Resistance and Fitness in Glufosinate-ammonium-Resistant Transgenic Rice Plants vol.1, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2012.1.4.050
  4. Relationship of Fitness and Substance of Porphyrin Biosynthesis Pathway in Resistant Transgenic Rice to Protoporphyrinogen Oxidase (Protox) Inhibitor vol.31, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2011.31.2.134