Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring Impact of Scholarly Digital Archives : Analyses on Citation Indicators of PMC Journals

학술 디지털 아카이브의 영향력 측정에 관한 연구 : PMC 학술지의 인용지수 분석을 중심으로

  • 신은자 (세종대학교 신문방송학과)
  • Published : 2005.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is meaningful to develop the scholarly digital archives in a respect that it could preserve the research papers using digital media. The scholarly digital archives provide scientists with the information source with which scientists could actively accomplish research. This study measured based on the citation analysis to what extent PMC, which is life science scholarly digital archives, has an effect on the scholarly communication in the same subject field. The findings are as follows. First, the three citation indicators, impact factor, immediacy index, and half-life, have no remarkable difference in between pre and post-digital archives era. Second, there were more cases that the major citation indicators increased rather than ones decreased with the appearance of the scholarly digital archives, as a result of ranking the scholarly journals after classifying according to subjects.

학술 디지털 아카이브의 구축은 학계에 이미 전파된 연구성과를 디지털 형태로 보존하여 연구자로 하여금 활발한 연구를 수행하는 정보자원으로 활용할 수 있게 한다는 면에서 중요하다. 이 연구는 생명과학 학술 디지털 아카이브인 PMC가 실제 생명과학 분야 학술 커뮤니케이션에 어느 정도 영향력을 미치고 있는 지를 분석하고자 하였다. 연구결과 학술 디지털 아카이브 등장을 계기로 영향력지표, 즉시성지수, 반감기 등 세 인용지수의 추이가 변화하지는 않았다. 반면에 주제별로 학술지의 인용지수를 산출하여 학술지의 순위를 평가한 결과에서는 학술 디지털 아카이브의 등장 이후 학술지의 인용지수 순위가 향상되는 경우가 하락하는 경우보다 많았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권은경. 2002. 학술잡지 출판의 변화에 의한 학술 커뮤니케이션 개선방안. "도서관.정보학회지", 33(1): 77-21.
  2. 김상준, 김정아, 이미나. 2002. 학술 커뮤니케이션의 변화와 PMC(PubMed Central). "충남대 문헌정보학논집", 8: 175-194.
  3. 김상준, 김정아, 이미나. 2001. 과학논문의 전자출판과 무료 전자 아카이브. "제8회 한국정 보관리학회 학술대회 논문집", 259-264.
  4. 김선미, 이나니. 2005. 대학 학술정보 관리를 위한 오픈 액세스 기반 기관 레포지터 리 운영방안 연구. '정보관리연구', 36(2): 45-71
  5. 손정표, 심상순. 2001. 전자 저널의 이용평가에 관한 연구. "한국도서관.정보학회지", 32(4): 419-447.
  6. 이두영, 황옥경. 2003. 학술 커뮤니케이션의 새로운 동향 :자유이용을 중심으로. "정보관리연구", 34(2): 1-23.
  7. 장금연. 2004. 학술정보유통을 위한 레포지터 리 적용 방안 연구. "정보관리학회지", 38(4): 291-310.
  8. 최재황. 2002. 국내 학회발행 학술잡지의 전자 저널 출판모형 개발에 관한 연구. "한국문헌정보학회지", 36(2): 39-54.
  9. 황혜경, 김혜선, 최선희. 2004. 오픈액세스기반 지식정보저장소 구축에 관한 연구. "한국비블리아학회", 15(1): 91-116.
  10. Antelman, K. 2004. "Do open-access articles have a greater research impact?" College & Research Libraries, 65(5): 372-382. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.5.372
  11. Bollen, J. et. al. 2005. "Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data." Information Processing & Management, 41(6): 1419-1440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
  12. Brody, T. et. al. 2004. The effect of open access on citation impact. [cited 2005. 6. 13]. .
  13. Cronin, B. 2001. "Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis." Journal of Information Science, 27(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150102700101
  14. Davis, P. M. 2003. "Effect of the web on undergraduate citation behavior: Guiding student scholarship in a networked age" Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1): 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0005
  15. Delamothe, T. 2004. "Open access publishing takes off." British Medical Journal, 328: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7430.1
  16. Dryburgh, A. 2004. "Open access: time to stop preaching to the converted." Learned Publishing, 17(1): 69-70. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315104322710287
  17. European Molecular Biology Organization. 2004. E-BioSci Homepage. [cited 2005. 6. 25]. .
  18. Fox, P. 2002. "Archiving of electronic publications - some thoughts on cost." Learned Publishing, 15(1): 3-5. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315102753303625
  19. Friend, F. J. 2004. "How can there be open access to journal articles?" Serials, 17(1): 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1629/1737
  20. Guthrie, K. M. 2000. Revitalizing older published literature: preliminary lessons from the use of JSTOR. [cited 2005. 7. 3 ]. .
  21. Harnad, S. T. et. al. 2004. "The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access." Serials Review, 30(4): 310-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013
  22. Harnad, S. T., and T. Brody. 2004. "Comparing the impact of open access(OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals." D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). [cited 2005. 6. 25]. .
  23. Hitchcock, S., T. Brody, C. Gutteridge, L. Carr, and S. Harnad. 2003. "The impact of OAI-based search on access to research journal papers." Serials, 16(3): 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1629/16255
  24. Hurd, J. M. 2000. "The transformation of scientific communication : a model for 2020." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14): 1279-1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1044>3.0.CO;2-1
  25. Kling, R., L. B. Spector, and J. Fortuna. 2003. "The real stakes of virtual publishing: The transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(2): 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10352
  26. Kurtz, M. J. et.al. 2005. "The effect of use and access on citations." Information Processing & Management, 41: 1395-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.010
  27. Lawrence, S. 2001. "Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact." Nature, 411: 521. https://doi.org/10.1038/35079151
  28. Look, H. 2004. "Open access: look both ways before crossing." Serials, 17(3): 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1629/17217
  29. Odlyzko, A. 2002. "The rapid evolution of scholarly communication." Learned Publishing, 15(1): 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315102753303634
  30. Okerson, A. 2003. "Towards a vision of inexpensive scholarly journal publication." Libri, 53(3), 186-193. https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2003.186
  31. Pelizzari, E. 2004. "Academic authors and open archives: a survey in the social science field." Libri, 54: 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2004.113
  32. PMC. 2005. PubMed Central Homepage. [cited 2005. 7. 11]. .
  33. Pringle, J. 2005. "Do open access journals have impact?" Nature (Web Focus). [cited 2005. 7. 16]. .
  34. Seeds, R. S. 2002. "Impact of a digital archive(JSTOR) on print collection use." Collection Building, 21(3): 120-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/01604950210434551
  35. Seglen, P. O. 1997. "Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research." BMJ, 314: 497. [cited 2005. 6. 29]. .
  36. Shin, E. J. 2003. "Do impact factors change with a change of medium?" Journal of Information Science, 29(6): 527-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551503296009
  37. Slowinski, F. H. 2001. "How 'free distribution'impacts your business model: is it really free?" Learned Publishing, 14(2): 144-148. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315101300059576
  38. Smith, A. G. 2005. "Citations and links as a measure of effectiveness of online LIS journals." IFLA Journal, 31(1): 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035205052651
  39. Steenbakkers, J. F. 2004. "Digital archiving: A necessary evil or new opportunity?" Serials Review, 30(1): 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2003.11.003
  40. Testa, J., and M. McVeigh. 2004. "The impact of open access journals : a citation study from Thomson ISI." [cited 2005. 7. 3]. .
  41. Van Diest, P.J., H. Holzel, D. Burnett, and J. Cocker. 2001. "Impactitis: new cures for an old disease." Journal of Clinical Pathology, 54: 817-819. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.54.11.817