Study on Removal of DOC for Effluent from Nitrification and Denitrification Process with Zeolite by Combined Process of Coagulation and UF Membrane

제올라이트를 첨가한 질산화 탈질공정에서 응집과 UF공정을 이용한 처리수내 용존 유기물질 제거 연구

  • 한장혁 (인하대학교 환경토목공학부) ;
  • 윤태일 (인하대학교 환경토목공학부) ;
  • 조경철 (인하대학교 환경토목공학부) ;
  • 송재용 (인하대학교 환경토목공학부)
  • Received : 2005.06.16
  • Accepted : 2005.10.10
  • Published : 2005.10.15

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate EPS and SMP variation of sludge and effluent in nitrification and denitrification process with zeolite addition, a possible reduction of effluent DOC by URC(Ultra Rapid Coagulation) process. As a biological wastewater treatment result, EPS formation of both aeration and anoxic sludges are not affect by SRT variation. However, EPS concentration of sludges is higher in aeration tank than in anoxic tank by 6~8 mg EPS/ g VSS. Linear relationship between SMP to DOC indicates that SMP of bulk solution contributes to most of the biological treatment effluent DOC. DOC and turbidity removal efficiency was more improved with URC process than in a conventional coagulation. For pretreatment of UF filtration DOC removal was advanced by URC process than only UF filtration.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 인하대학교 서해연안환경연구센터

References

  1. 건설교통부 (2001) 수자원 장기종합계획
  2. 건설교통부 (2003) 하수도법 제5조 2의 3항
  3. 이정대 (1999) 응집-정밀여과를 이용한 정수처리 공정에서 응집조건에 따른 여과 특성 연구, 서울대학교 대학원 응용화학부 석사학위논문
  4. 이형술 (2000) 활성슬러지공정에서 zeolite의 첨가가 질산화 및 슬러지 침전성에 미치는 영향, 인하대학교 석사학위 논문
  5. 이창복 (2002) Zeolite 첨가 활성슬러지 공정과 표준 활성슬러지 공정에서 SRT 변화에 따른 체외 고분자물질 (EPS) 특성 비교, 인하대학교 석사논문
  6. APPA, AWWA and WEF (1998) Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater 20th edition
  7. Burn, R.G. (1989) Microbial And Enzymic Activaties In Soil Biofilms, Characklis W.G., Wilderer PA (eds), Structure and function of biofilms. Wily, Chichester, pp. 333-349
  8. Chao, A.C. and Keineth, T.M. (1979) Influence of process loading intensity on sludge clarification and thickening characteristics, Water Res., 13(12), pp. 1213-1220 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90165-9
  9. Evans, E., Brown, M.R.W., and Gilbert, P. (1994) Iron chelator, exopolysaccharides and protease production in Staphylococcus epidermidis: a comparative study of the effects of specific growth rate in biofilm and planktonic culture, Microbiology, 140, pp. 153-157 https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-140-1-153
  10. Fogar, L. and Briski, F. (2003) Wastewater denitrification process-the influence of methanol and kinetic analysis, Process biochem., 39(1), pp. 95-103 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00318-7
  11. Frolund, B., Oalmgren, R., Keiding, K. and Nielsen, P.R. (1995) Extraction of activated sludge exopolymers by a cation exchange resin, Water Res., 56, pp. 216-230
  12. Gulas, V., Bond, M. and Benefield, L. (1979) Use of extracellular polymers for thickening and dewatering activated sludge, J. Water pollut. Coutrol Fed., 54(4), pp. 798-807
  13. Gander M., Jefferson B. and Judd S. (2000) Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations, Separation and Purification Technology, 18(2), pp. 119-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(99)00056-8
  14. Hsieh, K.M., Murgel, G.A., Lion, L.W., and Shuler, M.L., (1994) Interactions of microbial biofilms with toxic trace metals 1. Observation and modeling of cell growth, attachment, and production of extracellular polymer, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 44, pp. 219-231 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260440211
  15. Higgins, M.J. and Novak,J.T. (1997) Characterization of exocellular protein and its role in bioflocculation, J. Evion. Eng., 123(5), pp. 479-485
  16. Kiff, R.J. (1978) A study of the factors affecting bioflocculation in the activated sludge process, Water pollut. coutrol., 77(4), pp. 464-470
  17. Kim, C.G, Lee H.S., and Yoon, T.I. (2003) Resource recovery of sludge as a micro-media in an activated sludge process, Advances in Environ. Res., 7(3), pp. 629-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00046-1
  18. Lee, H.S., Park, S.J., and Yoon, T.I. (2002) Wastewater treatment in a hybrid biological reactor using powdered minerals: effects of organic loading rates on COD removal and nitrification, Process Biochem., 38(1), pp. 81-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00044-4
  19. Olah, J., Meszaros-Kis, A., Mucsi, G.Y. and Kallo, D. (1989) Simultaneous separation of suspended solids, ammonium and phosphate ions from wastewater by modified clinoptilolite, Zeolite as Catalysts
  20. Robinson, J.A., Trulear, M.G., and Characklis, W.G. (1984) Cellular reproduction and extracellular polymer formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in continuous culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 26, pp. 1409-1417 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260261203
  21. Scanlna, Pohlman, B., Freeman, S., spillman, B. and Mark, J. (1997) Membrane filtration for the removal of color and TOC from surface water, proceeding of AWWA membrane technology conference, Fed., pp. 23-26, New Orleans, LA
  22. Sheintuch, M. (1987) Steady state modeling of reactor-settler interaction, Water Res., 21(12), pp. 1463-1472 https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(87)90129-1
  23. Sheintuch, M., Lev, O., Einav, P. and Rubin, E. (1986) The role of exocellular polymer in the design of activated sludge, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 28, pp. 1564-1576 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260281015
  24. Sponza, D.T. (2002) Extracellular polymer substances and physicochemical properties of floes in steady and unsteady-state activated sludge systems, Process Biochem., 37(9), pp. 983-998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00306-5
  25. Turakhia, M.H., and Characklis, W.G. (1988) Activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms: effects of calcium, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 33, pp. 406-414 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260330405
  26. Wontae Lee, Seoktae Kang and Hangsik Shin. (2003) Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors, Journal of Membrane Science, 216(1-2), pp. 217-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00073-5
  27. Zhang, X., Bishop, P. L. and Kinkle, B. K (1999) Comparison of extraction method for quantifying extracellular polymers in biofilms, Wat. Sci. Tech., 39(7), pp. 211-218