Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal (한국실내디자인학회논문집)

Korean Institute of Interior Design (한국실내디자인학회)
권호 표지

Meanings and Expressions of Territoriality and Privacy in Traditional Korean Housing

조선시대 반가에 나타난 영역성과 사밀성 구축 방법에 관한 연구

  • 심은주 (건국대학교 건축전문대학원 실내건축설계학과) ;
  • 권영걸 (서울대학교 미술대학 디자인학부 공간디자인)
  • Published : 2005.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Territoriality and privacy are known to be basic human instincts that have made today's cultural evolution possible. However there are also cultural differences in the expressions and meanings of territorial and privacy behaviors. Currently with the emerge of non-territorial workplaces office workers are deprived from what used to be their territory and force to share with co-workers leading confusion and stress. Therefore many research has be conducted on territorial issues but unfortunately little is known on Korean cultural concept of territoriality and privacy. Eyen though Korean society has been rapidly westernized during the 20th century, traditional culture still is a major influence on Korean's concept and use of space. This study explores and investigates the concept of territoriality and privacy and how they are expressed in traditional Korean housing focused on high level society between 17th and 19th century. Thus hope make a small contribution in designing unique and culture based interior spaces.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, A., Individual psychology: Murchinson (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930. Clark University Press, 1930
  2. Altman, I. Environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Monterey CA: Brooks/Cole. 1975
  3. Averill, J. R., Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress, Psychology Bulletin, 80, 1973
  4. Derlega V. & Chaikin A., Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships, Journal of social issues, 1977
  5. Dyson-Hudson, R. & Smith, E.A., Human territoriality: an ecological assessment. American Anthropologist, 80
  6. Edney J. & Buda, M., Distinguishing Territoriality and Privacy: Two Studies, Human Ecology, Vol.4, No 4, 1976
  7. Edward H., The Hidden Dimension, Anchor Books, New York, 1966
  8. Fisher, J., Bell, P. & Baum A., 이진환.홀기원.정영숙(공역), 환경 심리학, 학지사, 서울, 1997
  9. Friedman, M.I.& Lackey, G.H., The psychology of human control, Praeger Publishers, 1991
  10. Glass, D. & Singer, J., Urban stress, Academic Press, New York, 1972
  11. Marcus C. & Sarkissian W., Housing as if people mattered, University of California Press, 1988
  12. Miller S. & Schlitt J. Interior Space, Praeger Publishers NY, 1985
  13. Newman O., Defensible space, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc, 1973
  14. White, R. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence, Psychologists, 1959, 39
  15. 노정희, 조선반가의 주거문화 고찰과 공간분석에 의한 환경디자인 모 형사례연구, 이화여자대학교 디자인대학원 석사학위논문, 1999
  16. 주남철 외, 한국전통주거에 있어서 안채와 사랑채의 분화과정에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집 12권 2호
  17. 한옥공간연구회, 한옥의 공간문화, 교문사, 2004