DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Sewage Irrigation on Rice Growth Condition in Paddy Soil

오수유입수 관개가 벼 생육환경에 미치는 영향

  • 김종구 (호남농업연구소 식물환경과) ;
  • 이경보 (호남농업연구소 식물환경과) ;
  • 박찬원 (호남농업연구소 식물환경과) ;
  • 이덕배 (호남농업연구소 식물환경과) ;
  • 김성조 (원광대학교 생명과학대학)
  • Published : 2005.06.30

Abstract

This study was peformed to assess environmental effect through rice culture with sewage irrigation using Iksan stream water from 2002 to 2003. Contents of $NH_4-N$ in irrigation water keep up one day at the tillering stage and panicle formation stage were decreased 40% and 52% respectively, but that of continued 4 days was decreased $88%{\sim}98%$. The $NH_4-N\;and\;NO_3-N$ in run off by reduction 50% fertilization were more decreased 17% and 44% respectively, than those of conventional fertilization level. Amount of K and $NO_3-N$ loss in infiltration water were more decreased 18% and 4% respectively, those of than conventional fertilization level. The Cu and Pb contents in soil of after experiment were slightly increased but other heavy metals were not accumulated. The rice yield by reduction 50% fertilization level was not significant compare with conventional fertilization level but head rice rate was increased.

오수유입수 관개답에서 작물 및 토양에 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위하여 익산천 하천부지논에서 2002년부터 2003년까지 벼를 대상으로 농가관행시비량과 50%감비량구 및 무비구를 두어 재배한 후 오수유입수 관개답에 대한 환경영향평가를 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 오수 유입답 담수일수별 논물 중 $NH_4-N$ 함량을 분얼기와 유수형성기에 비교한 결과 1일 담수는 $40{\sim}52%$, 4일 담수는 $88{\sim}98%$까지 각각 감소되었고 유수형성기가 분얼기보다 크게 감소되었다. 시비수준별 논물유출수의 성분함량변화는 농가관행시비보다 50% 감비시용이 $NH_4-N$는 17%, $NO_3-N$는 40%정도 감소되는 것으로 나타났고 지하수 침투수중 양분함량은 벼 재배기간 중 50% 감비가 관행시비보다 K는 18% 정도, $NO_3-N$는 4% 정도 감소되었다. 오수유입수 관개답에서 벼 재배 후 토양 층위별 질소 및 유효인산 증감정도는 농가관행시비시 작토층에 유효인산성분이 가장 많게 축적되었고, 50% 감비에서는 유효인산 집적량이 현저히 감소되었다. 토층 $50cm{\sim}100cm$에서도 농가관행 시비구에서 인산 및 질소가 집적되는 경향이었다. 토양 중 중금속 집적량은 대부분 성분이 자연 함유량 이하였으나 Cu와 Pb함량이 약간 증가되었다. 시비수준별 백미수량은 50%감비 시용구에서 농가 관행시용대비 98%가 생산되었고 완전미 비율은 증가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Shin, D. S. and Kwun, S. K. (1990) The concentration and input/output of nitrogen and phosphorus in paddy fields. Korean J. of Environmental Agriculture 9(2), 133-141
  2. Yoon, C. G., Kwun, S. K., Chung, I. M. and Kwon, T. Y. (1999) The effect of reclaimed sewage irrigation on the rice cultivation. Korean J. of Environmental Agriculture 18(3), 236-244
  3. Paliwal K., Karunaichamy K. S. T. K. and Ananthavalli M. (1998) Effect of sewage water Irrigation on growth performance, biomass and nutrient accumulation in Hardwickia binata under nursery conditions. Bioresource Technology 66(2), 105-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00044-3
  4. Yoon, C. G., Kwun, S. K. and Woo, S. H. (2000) Effect of reclaimed sewage irrigation on paddy rice culture and soil characteristics. J. of the Koeran Society of Agricultural Engineers 42(3), 66-75
  5. Tarchitzky J, Golobati Y., Keren R. and Chen Y. (1999) Waste water effects on montmorillonite suspensions and hydraulic properties of sandy soils. Soil Sci. Society of America J. 63(3), 554-560 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300030018x
  6. Kim, J. G., Lee, D .B., Kang, J. K., Lee, J. S., So, J. D. and Lee, G.S. (1994) Influence of Irrigated wastewater on rice growth, soil chemical property and irrigation water quality. RDA J. of Agricultural Sci. 36(1), 253-258
  7. RDA. (1995) Standard methods for agricultural experiment. RDA, p. 603
  8. RDA. (2000) Methods of soil and plant analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. RDA
  9. WJhardjaka A, Kirk G.J.D., Abdulrachman S, Mmmaril C.P. (1999) Potassium balances in rainfed lowland rice on a light-textured soil. Field Crops Research 64, 237-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00045-3
  10. Kim, S. H., Kwon, J. D. and Park, Y. K. (1999) A study on ground water recharge and nitrogen leaching rates in a rice paddy near bank filtration site. J. of Kor. Society of Environ. Engineers 21(6), 1157-1170
  11. Yoon, C. G., Kwun, S. K., Chung, I. M. and Kwon, T. Y. (1999) Review of agricultural water quality standards through rice culture with treated sewage irrigation. J. of the Kor. Society of Agr. Engineers 41(2), 44-54