Project Duration Estimation and Risk Analysis Using Intra-and Inter-Project Learning for Partially Repetitive Projects

부분적으로 반복되는 프로젝트를 위한 프로젝트 내$\cdot$외 학습을 이용한 프로젝트기간예측과 위험분석

  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

This study proposes a framework enhancing the accuracy of estimation for project duration by combining linear Bayesian updating scheme with the learning curve effect. Activities in a particular project might share resources in various forms and might be affected by risk factors such as weather Statistical dependence stemming from such resource or risk sharing might help us learn about the duration of upcoming activities in the Bayesian model. We illustrate, using a Monte Carlo simulation, that for partially repetitive projects a higher degree of statistical dependence among activity duration results in more variation in estimating the project duration in total, although more accurate forecasting Is achievable for the duration of an individual activity.

Keywords

References

  1. Ayas, K, 'Professional Project Management : A Shift towards Learning and a knowledge Creating Structure,' International Journal of Project Management, Vol.14(1996), pp. 131-136 https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00080-1
  2. Badiru, A.B., 'Incorporating Learning Curve Effects Into Critical Resource Diagramming,' Project Management Journal, Vol.26, No.2 (1995), pp.38-45
  3. Beaver Creek Resort, Avon, Colorado, The Urban Land Institute, Vol.15, No.5(1995), Jan.-Mar
  4. Chatzogou, P.D. and L.A. Macaulay, 'A Review of Existing Models for Project Planning and Estimation and the Need for a New Approach,' International Journal of Project Management, Vol.14, No.3(1996), pp.173-183 https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00074-7
  5. Cho, S. and Z. Covaliu, 'Sequential Estimation and Crashing in PERT Networks with Statistical Dependence,' International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol.10, No.4 (2003) , pp.391-399
  6. Covaliu, Z. and R. Soyer, 'Bayesian Project Management,' Proceedings of the ASA section on Bayesian Statistical Science, (1996), pp.208-213
  7. Covaliu, Z. and R. Soyer, 'Bayesian Learning in Project Management Networks,' Proceedings of the ASA section on Bayesian Statistical Science, (1997), pp.257-260
  8. Diaz, A.M., M.A. Virto, J. Martin, and D.R. Insua, 'Approximate Solutions to Semi Markov Decision Processes through Markov Chain Montecarlo Methods,' Computer Aided Systems Theory - Eurocast, LNCS 2809, (2003), pp.151-162
  9. Farrow, M., M. Goldstein, and T. Spiropoulos, 'Developing a Bayes Llinear Decision Support System for a Brewery,' The Practice of Bayesian Analysis (S. French and J. Q. Smith eds.), Edward Arnold, (1997), pp.71-106
  10. Farrow, M., 'Bayes Linear Networks and Nonlinearities,' International Bayesian Conference, Valencia Meeting, (1998), pp.1-9
  11. Gokhale, DV, and S.J. Press, 'Assessment of a Prior Distribution for the Correlation Coefficient in a Bivariate Normal Distribution,' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, Vol.145, No.2(1982), pp.237-249 https://doi.org/10.2307/2981537
  12. Hartigan, J.A, 'Linear Bayesian Methods,' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, Vol.31(1969), pp.446-454
  13. Heizer, J. and B. Render, Principles of Operations Management, Prentice Hall, 1999
  14. Jenzarli, A, 'PERT Belief Networks,' Report 535, College of Business, The University of Tampa, FL., 1994
  15. Kendall, M.G., Rank Correlation Methods, 2nd edition, New York : Hafner, 1955
  16. Lindley, DV., A Tversky, and R.V. Brown, 'On the Reconciliation of Probability Assessment,' Journal of Royal Statistical Society A, Vol.142(1979), pp.146-180 https://doi.org/10.2307/2345078
  17. Manglik, P.C. and A Tripathy, 'Uncertainty of a Research and Development Project,' Project Management Journal, Vol.19(1988), pp.9-12
  18. Meredith, J.R. and S.J. Mantel, Jr., Project Management, John Wiley & Sons, 1995
  19. Savage, L.J., 'Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations,' Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol.66 (1971), pp.783-801 https://doi.org/10.2307/2284229
  20. Shtub, A., 'Scheduling of Programs with Repetitive Projects,' Project Management Journal, Vol.22, No.4(1991), pp.49-53
  21. Smith, J.E, S. Holtzman, and J.E Matheson, 'Structuring Conditional Relationships in Influence Diagrams,' Operations Research, Vol.41(1993), pp.280-297 https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.41.2.280
  22. Teplitz, C.J. and J-P. Amor, 'Improving CPM's Accuracy Using Learning Curves,' Project Management Journal, Vol.24, No. 4(1993), pp.15-19
  23. van Dorp, J,R. and M.R. Duffey, 'Statistical Dependence in Risk Analysis for Project Networks using Monte Carlo methods,' International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.58(1999), pp.17-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00081-4
  24. Virto, MA, J. Martin, and DR Insua, 'An Approximate Solutions of Complex Influence Diagrams through MCMC Methods,' In Proceedings of First European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, Gamez and Salmeron (Eds.), (2002), pp.169-175