MEASUREMENT OF OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY FOR NONROAD DIESEL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT

  • HUAI T. (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Research Division) ;
  • SHAH S. D. (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Ford Motor Company, Scientific Research Laboratory) ;
  • DURBIN T. D. (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California) ;
  • NORBECK J. M. (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

In order to better quantify the contribution from nonroad sources to emission inventories, it is important to understand not only the emissions rates of these engines but also activity patterns that can be used to accurately portray their in-use operation. To date, however, very little information is available on the actual activity patterns of nonroad equipment. In this study, a total of 18 pieces of nonroad equipment were instrumented with collected data including intake manifold air pressure (MAP), exhaust temperature and, on a subset of vehicles, engine rpm and throttle position. The equipment included backhoes, compactors, dozers, motor graders, loaders and scrappers used in applications such as landfilling, street maintenance and general roadwork. The activity patterns varied considerably depending on the type of equipment and the application. Daily equipment operating time ranged from less than 30 minutes to more than 8 hours, with landfill equipment having the highest daily use. The number of engine starts per day ranged from 3-11 lover the fleet with an average of 5 starts per day. The average percent idle time for the fleet was approximately $25\%$ with a range from 11 to $65\%$ for individual pieces of equipment. Duty cycles based on exhaust temperature/throttle position profiles were also developed for two graders and one dozer.

Keywords

References

  1. Alnslie, B., Rideout, G., Cooper, C. and McKinnon, D. (1999). The impact of retrofit exhaust control technologies on emissions from heavy-duty diesel construction equipment. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-0110
  2. Fritz, S. G. (1998). Emission factors for compression ignition nonroad engines operated on number 2 highway and nonroad diesel fuel. US EPA Report No 420-R-98-001 prepared by the Southwest Research Institute
  3. Gautam, M.,Carder, D. K.,Clark, N. N. and Lyons, D. W. (2002). Testing for exhaust emissions of diesel offroad engines. Final Report Prepared for the California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA under contract 98-317 by West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
  4. Jackson, C. and Helmer, K. (2001). Emission measurement in nonroad heavy-duty diesel engines operated over various transient duty cycles. Presented at the 11th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, CA
  5. Pollack, A. K., Tran, C. and Lindhjem, C. (1999). TNRCC construction equipment emissions project. Final report for the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Austin, TX by ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, CA
  6. Seigel, S. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company. New York
  7. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1991). Nonroad engine and vehicle study (NEVES). EPA Report No. 21A-2001, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC
  8. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1998). Exhaust emission factors for nonroad engine modeling compression-ignition. EPA Report No. NR-009A, M. Beardsley and C. Lindhjem, Office of Mobile Sources, Ann Arbor, MI
  9. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2000a). Reducing air pollution from nonroad engines. EPA Report No. EPA420-F-00-048, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC
  10. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2000b). Nonroad engine and vehicle emission study report. EPA Report No. EPA460-3-91-02, Office of Air and Radiation,U.S. EPA Washington, DC