Abstract
Deodorized soybean oils(DSO) were obtained to 2 types. Sample 1 was carried out a general refining process, which was degumming-alkali refining-bleaching-deodorizing. Sample 2 and 3 were not general refining process, its were carried out only both decantation of insoluble impurities and batch type deodorizing(BTD). At this time, BTD was composed of 3 stages, operating differences were vacuum degree, maximum temperature, stripping steam and retention time etc. DSO obtained were appeared original physicochemical characteristics. Sample 1 had acid value 0.034, Lovibond color, 9.1Y/0.9R, peroxide value 0 and thin yellow color's soybean oil. But sample 2 had acid value, 0.078, Lovibond color, 65.0Y/18.39R/4.2B/0.1N, peroxide value, 0.7 and bright green color's soybean oil. Sample 3 had acid value, 0.072, Lovibond color, 37.3Y/3.8R/0.1B/0.1N, peroxide value 1.6 and dark brown color's soybean oil. These colorful DSO were expects as raw-materials of various seasoning oils as like pine needle and/or perilla leaf seasoning oil.
대두유를 정제하는 과정에서 대두원유를 탈검-탈산-탈색-탈취의 일반적인 정제공정을 모두 거친 것과 이들 정제공정을 생략하고 협잡물만 제거한 후 그대로 탈취하여 고유의 색상을 갖는 독특한 대두유를 얻었다. 이 때의 차이는 Sample 1은 정상 탈취유, Sample 2, 3는 협잡물만을 제거한 다음 batch type deodorizer에 주입하여 진공도, 최고온도, stripping steam 주입량, 탈취시간 등을 차등화하여 3단계 탈취를 행하였다. 얻어진 탈취유의 이화학적 특성은 Sampl 1의 경우 산가 0.034, Lovibond color 9.1Y/0.9R, 과산화물가 0의 엷은 노란색 대두유였다. 그러나 Sample 2는 산가 0.078, Lovibond color 65.0Y/18.39R/4.2B/0.1N, 과산화물가 0.7의 밝고 투명한 녹색을 나타내었다. Sample 3은 산가 0.072, Lovibond color 37.3Y/3.8R/0.1B/0.1N, 과산화물가 1.6의 짙은 검붉은 갈색을 나타내어 차이를 보였다. 이러한 착색 탈취대두유는 앞으로 솔잎향미유, 들깻잎향미유 등의 다양한 향미유 제조의 원료유로 각광 받을 것으로 판단된다.
