Persistence Evaluation of Mosquito Repellents against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae)

흰줄숲모기에 대한 기피제의 지속성 평가

  • Kang, Shin-Ho (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jang, Sun-Ah (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Han, Jong-Been (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Dong-Kyu (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Chi-Hun (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Ki (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Lim (Drug Evaluation Department, Korea Food & Drug Administration) ;
  • Choi, Seon-Hee (Drug Evaluation Department, Korea Food & Drug Administration) ;
  • Kim, In-Kyu (Drug Evaluation Department, Korea Food & Drug Administration) ;
  • Kim, Gil-Hah (Department of Plant Medicine, Chungbuk National University)
  • 강신호 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 장선아 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 한종빈 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 서동규 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 송치훈 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 김민기 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과) ;
  • 김영림 (식품의약품안전청 의약품평가부) ;
  • 최선희 (식품의약품안전청 의약품평가부) ;
  • 김인규 (식품의약품안전청 의약품평가부) ;
  • 김길하 (충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 식물의학과)
  • Published : 2005.12.30

Abstract

Four mosquito repellents, product A (aerosol), product B (liquid), product C (aerosol) and product D (lotion) were tested for their persistent repellency and quantity of DEET remained with the lapse was analyzed. In shirt term test with human (or 8 hours, product A (aerosol), product B (liquid), product C (aerosol) and product D (lotion) appeared over 95% repellency for eight, five, six and six hours. respectively. In long-term tests with shirt piece for 16 days, product A (aerosol) and product C (aerosol) showed 100% repellency for 10 days. In the assay of quantity of DEET remained in shirt pieces with the lapse of time, two products was decreased to the same pattern.

본 연구는 장기간 지속효과가 강조된 미국 T사의 C제품(에어로졸)과 D제품(로션) 대비 국내5사의 A 제품(에어로졸)과 B 제품(액제)에 대하여, 사람 손에 처리 시 흰줄숲모기(Aedes albopictus)의 기피지속성에 대한 생물검정을 평가하고 시간 경과에 따른 기피 주성분인 DEET의 잔존량을 분석하였다 기피제 처리 후 8시간 조사에서 A제품은 8시간까지 95%의 기피효과를 나타냈으며, B제품, C 제품, D 제품은 각각 5, 6, 6시간까지 기피효과를 보였다. 그리고 면포를 이용한 16일까지의 장기간 지속성 평가에서, A 제품과 C 제품은 각각 10일까지 100%의 기피 지속성을 나타냈고, 시간 경과에 따른 기피 주성분인 DEET의 잔존량 분석에서도 동일한 양상으로 감소하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Annis, B. 1991. Comparison of the effectiveness of two Deet formulation against Aedes albopictus in the philippines. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 7: 543 - 546
  2. Catangui, M.A. and J.A. Wilson. 2003. Personal mosquito repellents available in South Dakota-2003. College of Agriculture & Biological Sciences. South Dakota State University; Available: http://agbiopubs.sdstate.edu/articles/ExEx8147.pdf
  3. Davis, E.E. 1985. Insect repellents: concepts of their mode of action relative to potential sonsory mechamisms in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 22: 237 -243
  4. Epstein, P.R. 2000. Is global warming harmful to health? Scientific American. August. 50-57
  5. Frances, S.P. and R.D. Cooper. 2002. Personal protection measures against mosquitoes. ADF Health. 3: 58-63
  6. How effective are DEET repellents? 2004. Available: http://lancaster.unl.edu/nebline/2004/aug04/page03.pdf
  7. Koren, G., D. Matsui and B. Bailey. 2003. DEET-based insect repellents: safety implications for children and pregnant and lactating women. CMAJ. 169: 209-212
  8. Mark, S. and M.D. Fradin. 1998. Mosquitoes and mosquito repellents: a clinician's guide. Annals of Internal Medicine. 128: 931-940 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-128-11-199806010-00013
  9. Mark, S., M.D. Fradin and F.D. John. 2002. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. N. Engl. J. Med. 347: 13-18 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011699
  10. Martens, W.M., T.H. Jetten and D.A. Focks. 1997. Sensitivity of malaria, schistosomiasis and dengue to global warming. Climatic Chainge. 35: 145 -156 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005365413932
  11. Mehr, Z.A., L.C. Rutledge, E.L. Morales, V.E. Meixsell and D.W. Korte. 1985. Laboratory evaluation of controlled-release insect repellent formulation. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1: 143-147
  12. Miller, P. 2004. Avoiding the bite: update on DEET. Canadian Pharmaceutical Journal/Revue Pharmaceutique Canadienne (CPJ/RPC). 2004: 44-47
  13. Partz, J.A. 2004. Global warming. BMJ 328: 1269 - 1270 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1269
  14. Personal insect repellents containing DEET(N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide and related compounds) [Re-evaluation decision document RRD2002-01]. Ottawa: Pest Management Regulatory Agency. Health Canada; 2002. Apr. 15. Available: www.pmrm-arla.ca/english/pdf/rrd/rrd2002-01-e.pdf
  15. Pitasawat, B., W. Choochote, B. Tuetun, P. Tippawangkosol, D. Kanjanapothi, A. Jitpakdi and D. Riyong. 2003. Repellency of aromatic turmeric Curcuma aromatica under laboratory and field conditions. J. Vec. Ecol. 28: 234-240
  16. Qiu, H., H. Won lun and I. Tao. 1997. Phamacokinetics of insect repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide in Beagle Dogs following intravenous and topical routes of administration. J. of Pharmaceutical Sciences. April. 514-516
  17. Rozendaal, J.A. 1997. Vector control. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  18. Rueda, L.M., L.C. Rutledge and R.K. Gupta. 1998. Effect of skin abrasions on the effecacy of the repellent DEET against Aedes aegypti. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 14: 178-182
  19. Tawatsin, A., S.D. Wratten, R.R. Scott, U. Thavara and Y. Techadamrongsin. 2001. Repellency of volatile oils from plants against three mosquito vectors. J. Vec. Ecol. 26: 76 - 82