터널과지하공간 (Tunnel and Underground Space)

  • 제15권3호
  • /
  • Pages.228-235
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1225-1275(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1748(eISSN)
한국암반공학회 (Korean Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering)
권호 표지

범용 Boek-Brown 파괴기준식의 직접 및 간접적 적용에 관한 수치해석과정의 비교 분석

Comparison between Direct and Indirect Implementation of Generalized Hoek and Brown Failure Criterion in Numerical Analysis Procedure

  • Deb Debasis (Mining Engineering Department, IIT, Kharagpur) ;
  • Choi Sung O. (Korea Institute of Geoscience & Mineral Resources)
  • 발행 : 2005.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Hoek-Brown의 파괴기준식으로부터 암반의 내부마찰각 및 점착강도를 계산한 후, Mohr-Coulomb의 항복함수를 이용하여 소성 보정이 적용될 수 있는 것으로 알려져 있다. 하지만 본 연구에서는 이러한 계산 과정이 연약 암반이나 낮은 봉압 조건의 암반에 대해서는 적합하지 않다는 사실을 보여주고자 한다. 즉, Hoek-Broun 재료 모델로부터 직접 및 간접적 적용에 의해 소성 보정을 수행하는 과정을 제시하였으며, 이를 통해 직접적 적용이 간접적 적용에 비해, 비선형 파괴면을 더욱 효과적으로 모사할 수 있고, 특히 봉압이 낮은 응력 조건에서 효과적임을 보여주고자 한다.

Friction angle and cohesion of rock masses can be estimated from Hoek and Brown failure criterion and then plastic corrections can be applied using Mohr-Coulomb yield function. This study finds that this estimation procedure would not be appropriate for weak rock masses and for cases where low confining stress is expected to develop. A procedure is outlined in this paper for estimating plastic corrections directly from Hoek and Brown material model. Comparative study shows that direct procedure would simulate non-linear failure surface better than indirect procedure especially in the low confining stress regime.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hoek E. and Brown E.T., 1988, The Hoek and Brown Failure Criterion-A 1988 Update, 15th Canadian Symposium of Rock Mechanics, Toronto
  2. Hoek E. and Brown E.T, 1997, Practical Estimate of Rock Mass Strength, Tnt. J. of Rock Mech. and Mining Sci. & Geomech. Abs., Vol. 34, No.8, pp. 1165-1186 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(97)00305-7
  3. Hoek E., Torres C.C., and Corkum B., 2002, Hoek and Brown. Failure Criterion-2002 Edition, 5th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium and 17th Tunneling Association of Canada Conference (NARMSTAC), pp. 267-271
  4. Hoek E., 1990, Estimating Mohr-Coulomb Friction and Cohesion Values from the Hoek and Brown Failure Criterion, Int. J. of Rock Mech. and Mining Sci. & Geomech. Abs., Vol 27, No.3, pp. 227-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(90)94333-O
  5. Zienkiewicz O.C and Cormeau I.C., 1974, ViscoPlasticity-Plasticity and Creep in Elastic Solids-A Unified Numerical Solution Approach, Int. J. of Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 8, pp. 821-845 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620080411
  6. Bathe KJ., 1982, Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice Hall Publication, 735p
  7. FLAC 2D, version 4.0 : Theory and Background Manual, 2002, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
  8. Cundall P., Carranza-Torres C. and Hart R., 2003, A New Constitutive Model Based on the Hoek-Brown Failure Criterion, Proceedings of the 3m International FLAC Symposium, FLAC and Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics, Sudbury, Canada, October 21-24, Balkema
  9. Srivastava R.K., Sharma K.G. and Varadarajan A., 1995, Finite Element Analysis of Circular, Horse-Shoe and Interacting Circular Tunnel, J. of Rock Mechanics and Tunneling Technology, Vol. 1, No.2, pp. 109-133
  10. Mostafa M.E, 2003, General Rock Failure Criterion, Mining Technology, Vol. 112, pp. A64-A68 https://doi.org/10.1179/037178403225011105
  11. Chen W.F. and Liu X.I.., 1990, Limit Analysis in Soil Mechanics, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 52
  12. Alonoso E, Alejano L.R., Varas F., Fdez-Manin G. and Carranza-Torres C., 2003, Ground Response Curves for Rock Masses Exhibiting Strain-Softening Behaviour, Int. Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 27, pp. 1153-1185 https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.315