산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제28권2호
  • /
  • Pages.18-26
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지

DEA와 BSC 기법을 이용한 조직 효율성 비교에 대한 연구

A Combined DEA-BSC methodology for evaluating organizational efficiency

  • 김범수 (한국씨티그룹캐피탈㈜) ;
  • 장태우 (한국전자통신연구원) ;
  • 신기태 (대진대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 박진우 (서울대학교 산업공학과)
  • 발행 : 2005.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The balanced scorecard(BSC) overcomes the limit of traditional financial statement that focuses on only financial performance. BSC is widely used in government and industry because of the clear representation of the relationship and logic between the key performance indicators(KPI) of 4 perspectives - financial, customer, internal process, and loaming and growth. However, traditional BSC does not consider evaluating the difference between the results measured by BSC. By using relatively small number of inputs and outputs In comparing decision-making units, data envelopment analysis(DEA) can aggregate multiple performance measures. In this research, we propose a methodology named CDB(Combined DEA and BSC) to evaluate the performance of organization considering financial and non-financial perspectives. CDB uses KPI of cause-and-effect relationship on BSC as inputs and outputs of DEA method. In addition, this research proposes a method of converting the KPI of BSC to the input and output variables of DEA, and enhancing discrimination power using the limit number of variables. We illustrate the methodology by giving an example of evaluating aquisition-unit efficiency in a supply chain.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 백경민; 'DEA를 이용한 우정사업 경영성과 평가모형에 관한 연구', 석사학위논문, 서울대학교, 2001
  2. 신정호; 'DEA를 이용한 생명보험회사의 효율성 측정에 관한 연구', 석사학위논문, 서울대학교, 2000
  3. 윤석진 외; '은행 지점의 효율성 평가 : DEA 모형을 이용한 분석 절차 및 사례 분석', 한국경영과학회지, 26(3) : 39-52, 2001
  4. 이명호, 이우형, 손성혁; '인터넷 벤처비즈니스 평가체계에 관한 연구', 한국경영과학회지, 26(3) : 21-37, 2001
  5. Balanced Scorecard (BSC) Homepage,
  6. Chandra, P., Cooper, W. W., Li, S., Rahman, A.; 'Using DEA to evaluate 29 Canadian textile companies', International Journal of Production Economics, 54(2) : 129-141, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00135-7
  7. Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., Yu, G.; 'IDEA and AR-IDEA : models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA', Management Science, 45(4) : 597-608, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.4.597
  8. Dyson, R. R.; 'Strategy, performance and operational research', Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(1) : 5-11, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600916
  9. Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., Shale, E. A.; 'Pitfall and protocols in DEA', European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2) : 245-259, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
  10. Emrouznejad, A., Ali Emrouznejad's DEA Homepage,
  11. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P.; 'The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance', Harvard Business Review, 70(1) : 71-79, 1992
  12. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P.; The balanced scorecard : translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1996
  13. Liu, J., Ding, F.-Y. and Lall, V.; 'Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement', Supply Chain Management, 5(3) : 143-150, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540010338893
  14. Procurement Executives' Association; Guide to a Balanced Scorecard Performance Management Methodology,
  15. Ritchie, P. C., Rowcroft, J. E.; 'Choice of metric in the measurement of relative productive efficiency', International Journal of Production Economics, 46-47 : 433-439, 1996
  16. Saha, A., Ravisankar, T. S.; 'Rating of Indian commercial banks : A DEA approach', European Journal of Operational Research, 124(1) : 187-203, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00167-8
  17. Sarrico, C. S., Hogan, S. M., Dyson, R. G., Athanassopoulos, A. D.; 'Data envelopment analysis and university selection', Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(12) : 1163-1177, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600475
  18. Sarrico, C. S., Dyson, R. G.; 'Using DEA for planning in UK universities', Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(7) : 789-800, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600949
  19. Shafer, S. M., Bradford, J. W.; 'Efficiency measurement of alternative machine component grouping solutions via data envelopment analysis', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42(2) : 159-165, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1109/17.387270
  20. Al-Shammari, M.; 'Optimization modeling for estimating and enhancing relative efficiency with application to industrial companies', European Journal of Operational Research, 115(3) : 488-496, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00025-3
  21. Shang, J. and Sueyoshi, T.; 'A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System', European Journal of Operational Research, 85(2): 297-315, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00041-A