Korean Journal of Poultry Science (한국가금학회지)

The Korean Society of Poultry Science (한국가금학회)
권호 표지

Effects of Applying Two Chemical Additives to the Litter on Nitrogen and Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Contents of Litter in Broiler House

두 가지의 화학제재 첨가가 육계 깔짚내 질소와 수용성 인의 함량에 미치는 영향

  • Choi I. H. (Feed and Nutrition Laboratory, College of Natural Resources, Taegu University) ;
  • Nahm K. H. (Feed and Nutrition Laboratory, College of Natural Resources, Taegu University)
  • 최인학 (대구대학교 자연자원대학 가축사료영양학 연구실) ;
  • 남기홍 (대구대학교 자연자원대학 가축사료영양학 연구실)
  • Published : 2004.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the effects of two chemical additives on nitrogen (N) and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) contents in litter (rice hull) after broiler chicks were raised for 42 days. Two different additives were applied as a top dressing to the litter at a rate of 200 g ferrous sulfate $(FeSO_4)$ or 200 g aluminum sulfate [$Al_2(SO_4)_3$ $\cdot$ $14H_2O$, Alum] per kg litter, while the control group did not have the two chemicals added to the litter. A total of 64 broiler chicks (4 treatments$\times$4 replicates$\times$4 birds) were fed the experimental diets for 6 weeks. There was no difference in pH between the two chemical treatments and control group, but SRP content was significantly affected on it (P<0.01). SRP contents from ferrous sulfate and alum treated litter at 6 weeks were reduced by $79\%$ and $60\%$, respectively, as the two chemical treatments decreased the pH compared to the control group. In the ferrous sulfate treated litter, EC, TC, $NH_4-N$, $NO_3$-N, and IN contents did not show any difference between $FeSO_4$ treatment and control. However, the differences between $FeSO_4$ treatment and control were found in moisture, TN, ON, AN, PAN, C:N, and C:ON contents (P<0.01). As seen in the alum treated litter, there were differences in moisture, TC, TN, $NH_4-N$, IN, AN, PAN, and C:N contents between alum treatment and control (P<0.05 and 0.01) but no differences in EC, $NO_3-N$, ON, and C:ON. In conclusion, the results of this research show that ferrous sulfate and alum-treatment of poultry litter has the potential to increase N and reduce SRP content by lowering litter pH and moisture content.

본 연구에서는 두 화학제재($FeSO_4$와 Alum)를 처리한 영향이 깔짚 위에서 육계를 42일간 사육한 후 깔짚내 질소와 수용성 인 함량에 어떤 차이가 있는지 대조구와 비교시험을 하였다. 2가지 실험은 처리구에서 깔짚 kg당 화학제재를 $FeSO_4$ $7H_2O$ 200 g이나 $Al_2(SO_4)_3$ $\cdot$ $14H_2O$ 200 g을 top dressing 한 후 그 각각을 대조구와 비교하였다. 사양시험에서는 총 64수(4처리$\times$4반복$\times$4수)의 육계를 배치하였다. 두 화학제재 처리구($FeSO_4$와 Alum)는 두 대조구와 비교할 때 pH는 통계적 유의성이 없었지만, 수용성 인 함량은 고도의 유의성이 인정되었다(P<0.01). 두 화학제재 처리구($FeSO_4$와 Alum)의 SRP 함량은 대조구 각각보다 $79\%$와 $60\%$의 감소를 보였다 $FeSO_4$ 처리구와 대조구간에는 EC, TC, $NH_4$-N, $NO_3$-N 및 IN 함량은 유의성이 없었지만, 수분, TN, ON, AN, PAN C:N 및 C:ON은 통계적 유의성이 인정되었다(P<0.01). Alum 처리구와 대조구의 결과는 EC, $NO_3$,-N, ON 및 C:ON을 제외한 수분, TC, TN, $NH_4$-N, IN, AN, PAN 및 C:N은 통계적 유의성이 인정되었다(P<0.05와0.01). 본 연구 결과를 다시 종합하면 깔짚에 두 화학제재를 각각 처리할 경우 깔짚내의 질소 함량은 높았으며 SRP함량을 감소시켰다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Public Health Association 1992 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th ed. A. E. Greenbery, L. S. Clesceri, and A. D. Eaton, ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
  2. Bitzer CC, Sims JT 1988 Estimating the availability of nitrogen in poultry manure through laboratory and field studies. J Environ Qual 17:47-54
  3. Burgess RP, Carey JB, Shafer DJ 1998 The impact of pH nitrogen retention in laboratory of broiler litter. Poultry Sci 77:1620-1622
  4. Carlile FS 1984 Ammonia in poultry houses: A literature review. World's Poulty Sci J 40:99-113
  5. Castellanos JZ, Pratt PF 1981 Mineralization of manure nitrogen-correlation with laboratory indices. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:354-357
  6. Chadwick DR, John F, Pain B F, Chambers BF, Williams J 2000 Plant uptake of nitrogen from the organic nitrogen fraction of animal manures: a laboratory experiment. J Agric Sci 134, 159-168
  7. Chescheir GM, Westerman Ⅲ PW, Safley Jr LM 1986 Laboratory methods for estimating available nitrogen in manures and sludges. Agri Wastes 18:175-195
  8. Choi IH, Nahm KH 2003 Effects of dietary protein levels and addition of aluminum sulfate to litter on broiler performance, ammonia production and soluble phosphorus content of litter. Korean J Poultry Sci 30(2):113-118
  9. Douglas BF, Magdoff FR 1991 An evaluation of nitrogen mineralization indices for organic residues. J Environ Qual 20:368-372
  10. Edwards DR, Daniel TC 1992 Environmental Impacts of On-Farm Poultry Waste Disposal. Bioresource Technology 41:9-33
  11. Edwards DR, Daniel TC 1993 Effects of poultry litter application rate and rainfall intensity on quality of runoff from fescue grass plots. J Environ Qual 22:361-365
  12. Elliott HA, Collins NE 1982 Factors affecting ammonia release in broiler litter. Trans ASAE 39(3):1135-1144
  13. Hadas A, Bar-Yosef B, Davidov S, Sofer M 1993 Effect of pelleting, temperature and soil type on normal nitrogen release from poultry and dairy manures. Soil Sci Am J 47:1129-1133
  14. Johnston NL, Quarles CL, Faberberg DJ, Caveny DD 1981 Evaluation of yucca saponin on broiler performance and ammonia suppression. Poultry Sci 60:2289-2292
  15. Kirchmann H 1985 Losses, plant uptake and utilization of manure nitrogen during a production cycle. Acta Agr Scan 24(Supple) 75
  16. Kithome M, Paul JW, Bomke AA 1999 Reducing N losses during simulated composting of poultry manure using adsorbents or chemical amendments. J Environ Qual 25:194-201
  17. Knezek, BD, Miller RH 1976 Application of sludges and waste waters on agricultural land. Research Bulletin 1090. Ohio Agriculture Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH, USA. pp 1.1-1.2
  18. Kulling DR, Menzi H, Krober TF, Neftel A, Sutter F, Lischer P, Kreuzer M 2001 Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from different types of dairy manure during storage as affected by dietary protein content. J Agric Sci 137: 235-250
  19. MAFF 1991 Code of good agricultural practice for the protection of water. London:HMSO, London pp.79
  20. MAFF 1994 Fertilizer Recommendations. Reference Book 209. 6th Edition. London: HMSO
  21. Mary B, Recous S 1994 Measurement of nitrogen minerlization and immobilization fluxes in soil as a means of predicting net mineralization. European J Agri 3:1-10
  22. Mathers AC, Goss DW 1979 Estimating animal waste applications to supply crop nitrogen requirements. Soil Sci Am Proc 43:364-366
  23. Mindermann G 1968 Addition, decomposition and accumulation of organic matter in forests. J Ecology 56:355-362
  24. Moore Jr PA 1995 Reducing ammonia volatilization from poultry litter with aluminum sulfate. In: Proceeding of the Meeting Arkansas Nutrition Conference, Clarion Inn Fayetteville Ar USA pp:104-119
  25. Moore Jr PA, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM 1995 Effects of chemical amendments on reduce ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. J Environ Qual 24:293-300
  26. Moore Jr PA, Daniel TC, Edwards DR 1999 Reducing phosphorus runoff and improving poultry production with alum. Poultry Sci 78:692-698
  27. Moore Jr PA, Daniel TC, Edwards DR 2000 Reducing phosphorus runoff and inhibiting ammonia losses from poultry manure with aluminum sulfate. J Environ Qual 29:37-49
  28. Nahm KH 1992 Practical Guide to Feed, Forage and Water Analysis(English Edition). Yoo Han Pub. Co.; Seoul, South Korea
  29. Nahm KH 2002 Efficient feed nutrient utilization to reduce pollutants in poultry and swine manure. Crit Rev Eviron Sci and Tech 32(1):1-16
  30. Nahm KH 2003 Evaluation of the nitrogen content in poultry manure. World's Poultry Sci 59:77-88
  31. Perkin HF, Parker MB, Walker ML 1964 Chicken manure-its production, composition, and use as a fertilizer. Bull. NS 123, Georgia Agriculture Experiment Station, Athens, GA
  32. Reddy KR, Khaleel R, Overcash MR Westerman PW 1979 A nonpoint source model for land areas receiving animal wastes: Ⅱ. ammonia volatilization. Trans. ASAE 22:1398-1405
  33. Reece FN, Bates BJ, Lott BD 1979 Ammonia control in broiler houses. Poultry Sci 58:754-755
  34. Ripley PG 1974 Nutrient removal-an American experience. J Water Pollut Control Fed 46:406-416
  35. Sims JT 1986 Nitrogen transformations in a poultry manure amended soil: temperature and moisture effects. J Environ Qual 15:59-63
  36. Sims JT, Wolf DC 1994 Poultry waste management: agricultural and environmental issues. Adv Agron 52:1-83
  37. Shreve BR, Moore, Jr PA, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM 1995 Reduction of phosphorus in runoff from field-applied poultry litter using chemical amendments. J Environ Qual 24:106-111
  38. Shreve BR, Moore Jr PA, Miller DM, Daniel TC, Edwards DR 1996 Long-Term Phosphorus Solubility in Soils Receiving Poultry Litter Treated with Aluminum, Calcium, and Iron amendments. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 27(11&12):2493-2510
  39. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG 1969 Statistical Methods, 6th Ed., Iowa State University Press Ames IA USA
  40. South Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station 1995 SOIL TESTING PROCEDURES. Plant Science Pamphlet 81:60-61
  41. Veloso JR, Hamilton PB, Parkhurst CR 1974 The use of formaldehyde flakes as an antimicrobal agent in built-up poultry litter. Poultry Sci 53:78-83
  42. 농촌진흥청 1999 친 환경농업을 위한 가축분뇨 퇴비.액비 제조와 이용
  43. 농촌진흥청 2002 비료관리 법령