STRESS ANALYSIS WITH NONLINEAR MODELLING OF THE LOAD TRANSFER CHARACTERISTICS ACROSS THE OSSEOINTEGRATED INTERFACES OF DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Lee Seung-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jo Kwang-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 발행 : 2004.06.01

초록

A modelling scheme for the stress analysis taking into account load transfer characteristics of the osseointegrated interfaces between dental implant and surrounding alveolar bone was investigated. Main aim was to develop a more realistic simulation methodology for the load transfer at the interfaces than the prefect bonding assumption at the interfaces which might end up the reduced level in the stress result. In the present study, characteristics of osseointegrated bone/implant interfaces was modelled with material nonlinearity assumption. Bones at the interface were given different stiffness properties as functions of stresses. Six different models, i.e. tens0, tens20, tens40, tens60, tens80, and tens100 of which the tensile moduli of the bones forming the bone/implant interfaces were specified from 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 percents, respectively, of the compressive modulus were analysed. Comparisons between each model were made to study the effect of the tensile load carrying abilities, i.e. the effectivity of load transfer, of interfacial bones on the stress distribution. Results of the present study showed significant differences in the bone stresses across the interfaces. The peak stresses, however, were virtually the same regardless of the difference in the effectivity of load transfer, indicating the conventional linear modelling scheme which assumes perfect bonding at the bone/implant interface can be used without causing significant errors in the stress levels.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adell R., Lekholm U. and Rockler B. A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaw, Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Olsson M, Friberg B, Nilson H, Kultje C. MkII-a modified self-tapping Branemark implant: 3-year results of a controlled prospective pilot study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 Jan-Feb 10:15-21
  3. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchl K Linden U, Bergstrom C, van Steertberghe D. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 Sep-Oct 14:639-45
  4. Naert I, Koutsilkakis G, Duyck J, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Biologic outcome of single-implant restorations as tooth replacements: a long-term follow-up study, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000 2:209-18
  5. Lindquist L.W., Rockler B. and Carlsson G.E. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue - integrated prostheses, J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:59-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90109-6
  6. Payant L, Williams JE, Zwemer JD. Survey oi dental implant practice. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:50-58
  7. Moon Byounghwa and Yang Jaeho : A study on the stress analysis of three root-form implants with finite element analysis, J. Korean Academy Implant Dentistry 1992;12(1):116-128
  8. LeGerosR.Z. and Craig R.G. Strategies to affect bone remodelling, J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:583-593
  9. Hoshaw S.J., Brunski J.B., Cochran G.V.B. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modelling and remodelling, lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-360
  10. Weinstein A.M., KlawitterJ.J., Anand S.C., Schuessler R : Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants, J Dent Res 1976;55:772-777
  11. Kinni M.E., Hokama S.N. and Capto A.A Force transfer by osseointegration implant device, Int J oral maxillofac implants 1987;2(1):11-14
  12. Cook S.D., Weinstein A.M. and Klawitter J.J. A three dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant, J Dent Res 1982;61:25-29
  13. Han Chonghun, Chun HungJac, Jung Sinyoung, Heo Seongjoo, Choi Yongchang, Chun Chongpyung, Ku Young, Rue Inchul, Kim Myungho. Studies of osseointegrated implant-models on stress distribution, J Korean Academy Protho 2000:38(4):526-542
  14. Papavasiliou G., Kamposiora P. and Bayne S.C.:Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as afunction of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function, J Prosthet Dent 1996;67(6):633-640
  15. Borchers L. and Raeichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development, J Dental Res 1983;62:155-159 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021401
  16. Lavernia C.J., Cook S.D., Weinstein A.M. and Klawitter J.J. : An analysis of stress in dental implant system, J Biomech 1981;14:241
  17. Rieger M.R., Mayberry M. and Brose M.O. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants, J Prosthet Dent 1990;63(6):671-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90325-7
  18. Kim, J.H. A study of the stress distribution on the second abutment and supporting tissues in fixed partial denture using three dimensional finite element analysis method, The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 2000;38:675-694
  19. Jung, E.S. A Study on the Bone Resorption Stress around a Dental Implant by Finite Element Stress Analysis of 4 Different Stages of Cervical Bone Resorption, MS Thesis, Kyungpook Nat. Univ., 2002
  20. Dong Won Kim, Soo Yong Park. A Study on the Osseointegrated Prosthesis Using Three Dimensional Finite Element Method, The Journal of Korea Academy of Prosthodontics 29:1,1991
  21. Meijer, HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A three dimentional finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible, Archs Oral Bio 38:491,1993
  22. Skalak R. Biomechemical consideration in ossteointegrated prosthesis, J Proth Dent 49:843;1983
  23. Lee, J.W. Bone Stress Distribution Around Dental Implant As a Function Of Load Transfer Characteristics Of The Osseointegrated Interface, MS Thesis, Kyungpook Nat. Univ., 2001