Effect of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on cell proliferation in the procedure of guided bone regeneration

골유도재생술시 탈단백 우골이 세포증식에 미치는 영향

  • In, Young-Mi (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Joon-Bong (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Herr, Yeek (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University)
  • 인영미 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 권영혁 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 박준봉 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 허익 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2004.09.30

Abstract

One of the bone substitutes now in routine use, deproteinized bovine bone mineral(DBBM), is regarded as resorbable and osteoconductive, but some studies refute this. The present study was performed to evaluate the effects of DBBM on guided bone regeneration using titanium membrane on the calvaria of rabbit. At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after surgery, the animal was scrificed. Non-decalcified specimens were produced for histologic analysis. The results of this study were as follows : 1. Titanium membrane was biocompatible and capable of space-maintaining, but there was ingrowth of soft tissue through the pore of titanium membrane. 2. There was no resorption or reduction of DBBM with time. 3. Some of the DBBM particles were combined with newly formed bone. But, apart from host bone, a great part of the particles were surrounded by connective tissue. 4. The bone formation was slight vertically and restricted to superficial area of host bone. Whithin the above results, DBBM dose not appear to contribute to bone formation. DBBM may disturb the migration and proliferation of mesenchymal cell derived from host bone and increase the growth of connective tissue. Therefore, careful caution is needed on selection of bone graft material and surgical protocol at guided bone regeneration for implant placement.

Keywords

References

  1. Lekholm U, Ericsson I, Adell R, Slots J. The con-dition of the soft tissues at tooth and fixture abutments supporting fixed bridges. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:558 -562 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00847.x
  2. Reddi AH, Weintroub S, Muthukumaran N. Biologic principles of bone induction. Orthop Clin North Am 1987;18:207-212
  3. Urist MR. Bone: Formation by aut- oinduction. Science 1965;150:893-899 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3698.893
  4. Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983;174: 28-42
  5. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preserva-tion. Clin Orthop 1989;238:249-281
  6. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the gen-esis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989;239:263-285
  7. Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. plastic Reconst Sur 1988;81:672-677 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004
  8. Kostopoulos L & Karring T. Augmenta- tion of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:75-82 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050203.x
  9. Storgard-Jensen S, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes, Int J Oral Msxillofac Imp 1996;11:55-66
  10. Hallman M, Lundgren S, Sennerby L. Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% auto-genous bone mixed with fibrin glue. Clin Imp Dent Rel Res 2002;3:87-96
  11. Schlegel AK, Donath K. Bio-$Oss^{\circledR}$ a resorbable bone substitute? J Long Term Effect Med Imp 1998;8:201-209
  12. Fugazzotto PA. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membrane. Part 1: Histologic results. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2003;23: 361-369
  13. Becker W, Becker B, Handelsman M, Ochsenbein C, Albrektsson T. Guided tissue regeneration for implant placed into extraction sockets: A study in dogs. J Petiodontol 1991;62:703-709 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.11.703
  14. Bragger U, Hammerle CHF, Lang NP. Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regenera- tion. II. A cross-sectional studty com- paring the clinical outcome 1 year after immediate to standard implant place- ment. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;7:268- 276
  15. Buser D, Bragger U, Land NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Impl Res 1990;1:22-32 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x
  16. Dahlin C. Lekholm U, Becker W, Becker B, Higuchi K, Callens A, van Steenberghe D. Treatment of fenestra- tion and dehiscence bone defects around oral implants using the guided tissue regeneration technique: A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Mexillofac Imp 1995;10:312-318
  17. Hammerle CHF, Olah AJ, Schmid J, Fluckiger L, Winkler JR, Gogolowski S, Lang NP. The biolog-ical effect of deproteinized bovine bone on bone ne- oformation on the rabbit skull. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:198-207 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080306.x
  18. Lang NP, Hammerle CHF, Bragger U, Lehmann B, Nyman SR. Guided tissue regeneration in jaw bone defects prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:92-97 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050205.x
  19. 이근혁. 골유도재생술시 그물형 티타늄막의 천공수가 골형성에 미치는 영향. 경희대학교 치과대학 치주과 교실 박사학위논문. 2003
  20. Sandberg E, Dahlin C, Linde A. Bone regenera-tion by the osteopromotive technique using bioabsorbable mem- branes. An experimental study in rats. Int J Oral Mexillofac Surg 1993;51:1106 -1114 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80450-1
  21. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:189-193 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00302.x
  22. Weibrich G, Trettin R, Gnoth SH, et al, Analysis of the size of the specific surface area of bone regeneration mat- erials by gas adsorption. Mund-Kiefer Gesichts Chir 2000;1-5
  23. Becker W, Schenk R, Higuchi K, Lekholm U, Becker BE. Variations in bone regereration adja-cent to implants augmented with barrier membranes alone or with demineralized freeze-dried bone or autologous grafts: A study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1995;10:143-154
  24. Jovanovic SA, Nevins M. Bone for- mation utiliz-ing titanium-reinforced barrier membranes. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1995;15:57-69
  25. Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in max-illofacial casualties. J Am Dent Assoc 1969;78:767-776 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8177(69)84023-7
  26. Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, Shafqat JP. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges. J Oral Mexillofac Sur 1985;43:87-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(85)90054-0
  27. Gongloff RK, Cole M, Whitlow W, Boyne JP. Titanium mesh and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts to augment the maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Mexillofac Surg 1986;15:263-268 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80083-7
  28. von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: A new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;11:387-394
  29. von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous ridge augmentation using autoge-nous bone and a micro titanium mesh: a prospective clinical study with 20 implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999;10:24-33 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100104.x
  30. Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kleinman A, Rohrer MD, McMillan PJ. The use of titanium mesh in con-junction with autogenous bone graft and inor-ganic bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for loca-lized alveolar ridge augmentation: A human study. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2003;23:185-195
  31. Artzi Z, Dayan D, Alpern Y, Nem- covsky CE. Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenic material supported by a configured titanium mesh: clinicohi- stopathologic and histochemical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 2003;18:440-446
  32. Lundgren AK. Lundgren D, Taylor A. Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation. An experi- mental study in the rat. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:251-260
  33. Gross J. Bone grafting material for dental appli-cation: A practical guide. Compendium 1997;18:1013-1036
  34. Wetzel AC, Stich H, Caffesse RG. Bone apposi-tion onto oral implants in the sinus area filled with different grafting materials. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6: 155-163 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060304.x
  35. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone(Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation pro-cedure: A his- tologic long term of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1999;14:835-840
  36. Wheeler SL, Holmes RE, Clahoun CJ. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts. Int J Oral Macillofac Imp 1996;11:26-34
  37. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8: 117-124 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080206.x
  38. Klinge B, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Jonsson J. Osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxylapatite ceramic in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Sur 1992;50: 241-249 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90320-Y
  39. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Kirsh A, Gloker C, Schupbach P, Strub JR, Caffesse R. Maxillary sinus augmenta- tion using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:476-486
  40. Skoglund A, Hising P, Young C. A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1997;12:194-199
  41. Pinholt EM, Bang G, Haanaes HR, Alveolar ridge augmentation in rats by Bio-Oss. Scan J Den Res 1991;99: 154-161
  42. Valentini P, Bbensur D, Densari D, Graziani JN, Hammerle C. Histological evaluation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:59-64 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090108.x
  43. Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The effect of a fibrin glue on the integration of Bio-Oss with bone tissue. An experimental study in labrador dogs. J Clin Periodontal 2002;29:377-383 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290501.x
  44. Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. Coo Oral Impl Res 2003;14:137-143 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.x
  45. Stavropoulos A, Kostopoulos L, Nyen- gaard, Karring T. Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and bioactive glass (Biogran) arrest bone forma-tion when used as an adjunct to guided tissue regeneration(GTR). An experimental study in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:636-643 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00093.x
  46. Slotte C, Lundgren D. Augmentation of calvarial tissue using non-permeable silicone domes and bovine bone mineral. An experimental study in the rat. Cliri Oral Impl Res 1999;10:468-476 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100605.x
  47. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1. Histomorp- hometric evaluation at 9 months. J Periodontol 2001;71:1015-1023
  48. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 2. Histochemical observations at 9 months. J Periodon-tol 2001;72:152-159
  49. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implanta- tion. Clinical and histological observa- tions in a case report. J Periodontol 1998;69:1062-1067 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1062
  50. Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Tal H, Dayan D. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite- bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: A comparative study in humans. J Periodontol 2001;72:911-920 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.7.911
  51. Schmid J, Hammerle CHF, Fluckiger L, Gogolewski S, Winkler JR, Rahn B, Lang NP. Blood filled spaces with and without filler mate-rials in guided bone regeneration. A compara-tive experi- mental study in the rabbit using bioresorbable membranes. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;875-81
  52. Hammerle CHF, Schmid J, Lang NP, Olah AJ. Temporal dynamics of healing in rabbit cranial defects using guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:167-174 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90396-8
  53. Hammerle CHF, Schmid J, Olah AJ, Lang NP. A novel model stystem for the study of experimen-tal bone formation in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:38-47 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070105.x
  54. Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR, Dahlin C. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in mem-brane-protected defects: A histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1994;9:13-20
  55. Rodan GA. Introduction to bone biology. Bone 1992;13(suppl 1):83-86
  56. Rodan GA. Mechanical loading, estrogen deficiency, and the coupling of bone formation to bone resorption: Comment. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:527-530 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650060602
  57. Young C, Sandstedt P, Skoglund A. A compara-tive study of anorganic xenogenic bone and autogenous bone implants for bone regenera-tion in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1999;1472-76
  58. Jarch M. Calcium Phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1982;157:259-278
  59. Spector M. Anorganic bovine bone and ceramic analogs of bone mineral as implants to facilitate bone regeneration. Clin Plastic Surg 1994;21:437-444
  60. Peetz M. Characterization of xenogenic bone material. In: Boyne PJ. Osseous reconstructon of the maxilla and the mandible: Surgical tech-niques using titanium mesh and bone mineral. 1st ed. Chicago, Berlin, London, Tokyo, Sao Paulo, Moscow, Prague and Warsaw: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1997:87-100
  61. Karabuda D, Ozdemir O, Tosun T, Anil A, Oglac V. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 differ-ent grafting materals for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. J Periodontol 2001;72:1436-1442 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1436
  62. Araujo M, Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, Thilander B, Lindhe J. Orthodontic movement in bone defects augmented with Bio-Oss, An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontal 2001;28:73-80 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280111.x
  63. Benezra Rosen V, Hobbs LW, Spector M. The ultrastructure of anorganic bovine bone and seclected synthetic hydroxyapatites used as bone graft substitute materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:921-928 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00204-6