The Comparative Study of Alveolar Bone Level and Root Form of the Mandibular Molar on Radiographic Image and Clinical Examination

방사선사진과 임상검사에서 하악 대구치 치근의 형태학적 구조 및 치조골 수준에 관한 비교연구

  • Park, Jung-Bae (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University) ;
  • Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University)
  • 박정배 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정진형 (단국대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2004.06.30

Abstract

Periodontal defects of the furcation are characterized by several inherent anatomic factors that can make successful periodontal therapy difficult and results unpredictable. The severity and rate of occurrence of periodontal disease are directly related to the location of the furcation relative to the cementa-enamel junction and anatomical form of the root by limiting the accessibility and effectiveness of the periodontal instrumentation. This study investigated the reliability and accuracy of panoramic radiograph diagnoses of the periodontal state of mandibular molars, particularly regarding the diagnosis of furcation area periodontal defects, treatment planning, and prognosis prediction. This study examined a total of 110 teeth belonging to 33 subjects (19 male, 14 female) presenting with incipient to moderate periodontitis 4-7mmpocket depth. The alveolar bone level, length and width of the root trunk, and root separation angle were measured using the panoramic radiograph and compared to the results taken directly by retracting a full-thickness flap. The results of the study are as follows: 1. Data regarding the alveolar bone level of the mandibular first molar showed that the directly taken surgical measurements resulted in $5.1{\pm}0.9mm$ that was slightly deeper than the corresponding panoramic measurement resulted in $4.8{\pm}0.8mm$, but these differences were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). 2. The data of the directly taken surgical measurement of the mandibular second molar $(5.1{\pm}1.1mm)$ was slightly deeper than the corresponding panoramic measurement $(4.7{\pm}1.2mm)$, but these differences were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). 3. The measured values of the length and width of the mandibular first molar root trunks were determined to be $4.1{\pm}0.6mm$ and $7.3{\pm}0.9mm$, respectively, while the values of the mandibular second molar root trunks were determined to be $4.6{\pm}1.3mm$ and $7.6{\pm}0.9mm$ respectively. The differences between these values were found to be statistically significant (p<0.01). 4. The measured values of the root separation angle showed that the mandibular first molars averaged $34.5{\pm}4.4^{\circ}$, while the mandibular second molars averaged $23.0{\pm}10.0^{\circ}$. The differences between these values were found to be statistically significant (p<0.01).

Keywords

References

  1. Ash, M.M., Gitlin, B.N. and Smith, W.A. : Correlation between plaque and gingivitis. J Periodontol 1964;35:424-429 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1964.35.5.424
  2. Newel, 1, D.H. : Current Status of the management of teeth with furcation invasions. J Periodontol 1981;52:559-564 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1981.52.9.559
  3. Socransky, S.S. : Relationship of bacteria to the etiology of periodontal disease. J Dent Res 1970;49:203-211 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490020401
  4. Waerhaug. J.: A method for evaluation of periodontal problems on extracted teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:160-175
  5. Everett. F.G., Jump. E.B., Holder, T.D. and Williams, G.C. : The intermediate bifurcational ridge.' A study of the morphology of the bifurcation of the lower first molar. J Dent Res 1958;37:162-175
  6. Grewe, J.M.. Meskin, L.H. and Miller. T. : Cervical enamel projections: prevalence ,location, and extent with associated periodontal implications. J Periodontol 1965;36:460-475 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.6.460
  7. Larato, D.C.: Some anatomical factors related to furcation involvement. J Periodontol 1975;46:608-615
  8. Masters. D.H., and Hoskins, S.W.: Projection of cervical enamel into molar furcations, J Periodontol 1963;35:49-65
  9. Swan, R.H. and Hurt, W.C. : Cervical enamel projections as an et-iologic factor in furcation involvement. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:342-355 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1976.0527
  10. Booker, B.K. and Loughlin, D.M. : A morphologic study of the mesial root surface of the adolescent maxillary first bicuspids. J Periodontol 1985;56:666-685 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1985.56.11.666
  11. Rabbani, G.M.. and Caffese, R.G. : The effectiveness of subgingi-val scaling and root planing in calculus removal, J Periodontol 1981;52:119-130
  12. Saxe, S.R. and Carmen. D.K: Removal or retention of molar teeth: The problem of the furcation, Dent Clin North Am 1969;13:783-790
  13. Wheeler, R.C. : Dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 6th ed,. p. 216-231 and 245-261, Philadelphia, W.B.Saunders Co, 1984
  14. 치주과학교수협의회 : 치주과학. 2nd ed., p.624, 지영문화사, 1991
  15. Mardam-Bey, W., Majzoub, Z. and Kon, S : Anatomic considerations in the etiology and management of maxillary and mandibular molars with furcation involvement, Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1991;11 : 398-409
  16. Gher, M. E. and Vernino, A. R. : Root morphology-clinical significance in pathogenesis and treatment of periodontal disease. JADA 1980;101:627-633
  17. Bower. R. C. : Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation entrance architecture. J Periodontol 1979;50:23-27
  18. Bower, R. C. : Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation root surface anatomy. J Periodontol 1979;50: 366-374
  19. Coldiron, N. Y., Yukna, R. A., Weir, J. and Caudill, F. : A quantitative study of cementum removal with hand curettes. J Periodontol 1990;61:293-299 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.5.293
  20. Knowles,, J. W., Burgett, F, G.. Nissle. R. R.. Shick, R. A.,Morrison. E. C. and Ramfjord, S. P. : Result of periodontal treatment related to pocket depth and attachment level ; Eight years. J Periodontol 1979;50:225-233 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1979.50.5.225
  21. Tal, H. :Relationship between the depth of furcal defect and alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1982;53:631-634 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1982.53.10.631
  22. Axelsson. P. and Lindhe, J. : Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults, J Clin Periodontol 1981;8:239-248
  23. Larato, D. C. : Furcation involvements: Incidence of distribution, J periodontol 1970;41:499-501
  24. Wheeler, R. : A Text book of Dental Anatomy and Physiology, 4th ed., pp 228-288, Philadelphia. W. B. Saunders Co., 1968
  25. 양경돈, 권영혁, 이만섭. :상악 제1대구치 치근면 함요의 정도와 발생빈도에 관한 연구, 대한치주과학회지 1992;22:112-121
  26. Masters, D. H. : and Hoskins, S. W. : Projection of cervical enamel into molar furcations, J Periodontol 1963;35:49-53
  27. Everett, F. G., Jump, E, B., Holder, T. D. and Williams, G. C. : The intermediate bifurcation ridge. : A Study of the morphology of the bifurcation of the lower first molar, J Dent Res 1958;37:162-175
  28. Bender, I. B. and Seltzer, S. : The effect of periodontal disease on the pulp, Arch Oral Biol 1960;2:177-186
  29. Burch, J. G., and Hulen, S.: A study of the presence of accessory foramina and the topography of molar furcations, Oral Surg.,38:451,1974
  30. Gutman, J. L. : Prevalence, location and patency of accessory canals in the furcation region of permanent molars, J Periodontol 1978;49:21-43
  31. 노영서, 이만섭, 권영혁 : 치주질환 환자에서 치근이개부 병변의 발생빈도 및 심도에 관한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 1990;20:287-295
  32. Ochsenbein C. : A primer for osseous surgery. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1986;632:9-47
  33. Marshall-Day, C. D. and Shourie, K. L. A Roentographic Surgery of Periodontal Disease in India. JADA 1949;39:577-588
  34. Ramfjord, S, P. : Indices for Prevalence and Incidence of Periodontal Disease, J Periodontol 1959;30:51-59 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1959.30.1.51
  35. Russell, A. L . A system of classification and Score for Prevalence Survey of Periodontal Disease. J Dent Res 1956;35:350-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.006
  36. Schei, J., Wahaug, J., Lovdal, A. and Arno, A. Alveolar Bone Loss as Related to Oral Hygiene and Age. J Periodontol 1969;30:716-734
  37. Worth, H. M. Principles and practice of oral radiographic interpretation. Chicago. III. : Year Book Medical Publishers. Inc. 1965
  38. Poison, A.M. : The root surface and regulation; present therapeutic limitations and future biologic potentials. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:995-1001 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb01439.x
  39. Rober. C.B. : Furcation development of human mandibular first molar teeth. A histologic graphic reconstructional study. J Pericdont Res 1983;18:412-422
  40. Sandier, H.C., and Stahal, S.S. : The measurement of periodontal disease prevalence. JADA 1959;58:93-111
  41. Shiloah. J. and Kopczzyk. R.A. : Developmental variations of tooth morphology and periodontal disease : JADA 1979;99:6-27
  42. Chiu, B.M. et al. : Periodontal implications of furcation enteran-ce dimensions in Chinese first permanent molars. J Periodontol 1991;62:308-322 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.5.308
  43. Grant, D.A., Stern, I.E. and Listgarten, M.A. : Periodontics, 4th ed.. p.921-930. Mosby. 1988
  44. Hermann. D.W.. Gher, M.E.. Dunlap. P.M.. and Pel leu. G.B. Jr. : The Potential attachment area of the maxillary first molar. J Periodontol 1983;54:431-444 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1983.54.7.431
  45. Levy. A.R. and Wright, W.H : The relationship between attachment height and attachment area of teeth using a digitizer and a digital computer. J Periodontol 1978;49:483-496
  46. Anderson, R, McGrarrah. H. , Lamb, R. and Eick, J. : Root surface measurements of mandibular molars using stereophotogrammetry. JADA 1973;107:613-632
  47. Hou, G.I and Tsai, C,C : Relationship between periodontoal furcation involvement and molar cervical enamel projections. J Periodontol 1977;58:715-722
  48. Leib, A.M., Berden, J.K. and Sabes. W.R. : Furcation involvements correlated with enamel projection from the cementoenamel junction. J Periodontol 1967;38:330-345 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.4.330
  49. Lindhe. J. : Textbook of clinical periodontology. 2nd ed. ,p.515, Munksgaard. 1989
  50. Waerhaug, J.: The furcation problem. Etiology, Pathogenesis. Diagnosis. Therapy and Prognosis. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:73-88
  51. Ainamo, J. and Tammisalo, H. Comparision of radiographic and clinical signs of early periodontal disease. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1973;548-552
  52. Barr, J. H. The scope and limitation of roentgenography as a diagnostic procedure. Dental Clinics of North America, pp.378-389, July. Philadelphia: W. B. saunders. 1961
  53. Goldman, H. M. and stalllard, R. E. Limitation of the radiographs in the diagnosis of osseus defects in periodontal disease, J Periodontol 1973;44:626-628
  54. Hollender, L, Lindhe, J. and Koch, G. A roentgenographic study of clinically healthy and inflamedperiodontal tissue in children. J Periodont Res 1961;146-151
  55. Akesson, Rohlin, Hakansson J. :Marginal bone in periodontal disease .An evaluation of image quality in panoramic and intra-oral radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1989;18:105-112 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.18.3.2637876
  56. Gutteridge D.L. : The use of radiographic and management of I periodontal diseases. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1995; 24(2):107-113
  57. Molander B. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics. Swed Dent J Suppl 1996;119:1-26
  58. Akesson L. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level. Swed Dent J Suppl 1991;78:1-129
  59. Hausmann E., Allen K, Norderyd J., Shibly O., Machtei E. : studies on the relationship between changes in radiographic bone height and probing attachment. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:128-132 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1994.tb00290.x
  60. Jeffcoat M. K. : Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1992;367-372
  61. 진형국 : 치근이개부병소를 지닌 하악대구치에 대한 치아형태학적 연구. 조선치대논문집 1995;34-57
  62. 유소현, 허수례, 이수정, 장문택, 김형섭 : 대구치치근융합의 발생빈도와 분포 및 생별과의 관련성 조사. 대한치주과학회지2002;32 :64-77
  63. 김승남, 구 영, 손성희, 최상묵 : 한국인의 대구치 치근이개부의 위치. 대한치주과학학회지 1998;28:572-573
  64. 임동진, 임성빈, 정진형 : 하악 제2대구치에서 치근의 이개도에 따른 치조골의 면적에 관한 연구, 미출간